Sentences with phrase «what ot»

Beauty comes from my heart, I still have what ot takes to make a man happy, ane expect the same in return.

This has given me more of an idea of what an OT does.

Jesus did everything what the OT - possessing Jews needed to see and hear.

In my opinion thats largely what the OT does.But when Jesus came he said that anyone who had seen him had seen the Father.

The NT is just finishing up what the OT said was going to happen.

Although you didn't come right out and say it, to me it sounds as though Jesus «thus saith the Lord» somehow conflicts or is in tension with what the OT prophets said.

Closely study only what Jesus said & what the OT states.

The basic response for many Christians trying to make EXCUSES for what the OT says is that they follow Jesus now so, in effect, the nonsense in the OT doesn't really count anymore.

Not exact matches

He didn't add any qualifiers like, «except of your neighbor is gay or black or poor or,,» So - called Christ - ians superimpose what Paul (a man, a mortal) said about women, and they add on things that are OT based in order to justify so much hatred and bigotry.

Thanks for proving, Kery, you know nothing about teh OT or what St. Paul wrote.

Vic has insisted on dumping bible bile on us today by the truckload, so it's time to take a look at what is really in his Christian book of nasty, from both OT and NT:

and certainly you believe King David (of all the OT figures) was forgiven for his sin... especially in light of what he says in Psalm 51, right?

By what incredibly twisted logic do you perceive America ot be yours?

Does that mean the throw away the ten in the OT, given by what seems to be a very hateful, spiteful and jealous god, and take up the free - thinking «god loves you» hippy who claims to be his son?

Remember the Jewish leaders did not recognize Him because of what they were expecting from their reading of the OT!

What we fail to remember is that the OT list represents a massive reduction in capital crimes from the original list.

Yeah there are a few differences in other areas, but your view of the Jews, the God of the OT, and rejection of what the prophets said about God, and the presentation of God in the OT, you two are like peas in a pod.

If a person must believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus, what was the object of faith for OT people and the apostles who did not (as far as we can tell) believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus?

I think there is much more going on in the OT violent texts than simply that humans were wrong about what God wanted.

Yes that is what I have been contemplating about the violence attributed to God in the OT.

I would point out that Saul was using a method of the OT god to wipe out what he considered to be a threat to God's chosen people.

Hays offers some valuable suggestions (for example, to pay attention to the Septuagint and to understand the larger context of OT allusions), while others seem confusing in their implications (what to do with the fact that the evangelists operated «with a de facto canon within the canon»?)

What I meant above is that I might give up on the book project in which I explain the violent portrayals of God in the OT in light of Jesus Christ.

Can we now get back to the topic on what sort of information we have to declare the OT as mythological?

aPERSIONAL relationship with God... you are being arrogant to assume youthink for me ot tellme what I want..

Well, just as you think I am not reading certain OT texts at face value, I think you are ignoring much of what these NT texts are saying, and not just these passages, but the whole tenor and focus of the ministry of Jesus.

The NT was to do away with the OT but yet both of you pick and choose what you go by.

Yes there are passages that point out what Jesus would do but the OT folks did not fully understand the implications.

And there are about 600 + commandments in the OT — what about all of the others?

When I said Jesus cleared things up it was with regard to what appeared in the OT to be a God that killed.

There are many similar verses (for example the verse «it is not what goes into a man's mouth that defiles him, but rather what comes out» which shows that the deitary laws of the OT no longer apply in the age of grace) that tell us which parts of the rules in the OT no longer apply in the age of grace.

The OT was established by Jews, not by Christians, so voting on it would be to solidify that which already existed and that is precisely what was done with the New Testament as well.

Careful with that OT stuff, you know there are several things in there where «you» should be kil - led if you are not doing it what it says or or doing it and you shouldn't be... (according the your book).

I, personally, ain't got what it takes to explain the OT to you, but there is a wonderful book out there that might address a LOT of your questions.

Please read genesis where there is no where it is mentioned that there was another partner with the Lord God... don't you think if what you are saying is correct than it will be mentioned in the OT... or OT and NT are contradicting each other... i could show more from the bible itself... i think most of the follower of it does not pay attention what to follow... they just follow blindly as Catholic church does not allow to have a copy of bible with the worshipper while they are at the church... they just have to be listening to the preacher....

that the babies would have had a better life HERE??? ARe YOU saying they are not in a better place?????? WHAT is your problem with GOD taking the babies ot heaven???

What did God say in the bible about marriage both OT and NT.

If you want to see «immoral» take a really close look at what the supposedly all - powerful Judeo - Christian «god» did to human beings throughout the bible, especially the OT.

Although I in no position to speak authoritatively for God, my own belief [based on my reading of the OT Prophets] is that God is probably a lot more concerned with what goes on in America's [and the rest of the First World's] boardrooms than S / He is with what takes place by non-coercive assent in our Nations» bedrooms.

Note that the OT is so much more than this to a Christian's life as it truly explains our story (humanity) and provides all the knowledge for us to understand ourselves, understand the nature of our God and what he wants from us (love, faith and obedience essentially).

And TparTpatriot still doesn't seem to get the clear argument that I forwarded re; the historicity of the ot being derived from the Sumerian pantheon and therefore doesn't remotely mean what you all think it means.

There are many similar verses (for example the verse «it is not what goes into a man's mouth that defiles him, but rather what comes out» which shows that the deitary laws of the OT no longer apply in the age of grace) that tell us which parts of the rules in the OT no longer applicable.

His Israel of God in Prophecy and Chariots of Salvation are two books that stick particularly to the Bible In both books he remains true to an exegesis that is rooted in the OT and NT Scriptures making it possible for the Christian to understand what has otherwise been an eschatological landscape filled with clouds of personal prognostications that masquerade as Biblical.

(Acts 15:28,29) To say that the prohibition against se2xual immorality is not for Gentiles the same as many of the other OT laws are not for Gentiles, goes against what the apostles said.

If you're questioning what the statement meant, the God of the OT has a record of killing people, does He not?

Very well put, a lingering question is what to do about the passages where God / Jesus in the OT / Revelation are said to be the authors of violence.

I was talking about how the BOOKS of the OT that wrere found in the caves were SHOWINH how consistent the BOOKS we have today are in what they SAY!

So if you read the OT you know that the world deserved what it got during the flood.

All those people complaining about violence in the OT, contradictions in the Bible, God being unfair, and such are usually never interested in actually researching and checking what scholars (who have poured much ink) have to say.

By the way, I agree with your comment on jc knowing the prophecies, and the NT being written, around 200bce, 1st, and 2nd centuries to «seem» to coincide with the OT books, is exactly what the jewish writers did not realistically (jc) compared jc to horus, and isis the zodiac sun gods (Egyptian stuff), but they the hellenistic jewish writers twisted a few things, changing the OT, adding, and taking away, which was warned to us not to do in Deut.4: 1 - 4, but these are YHWH enemies taught in Psalms 83.