Sentences with phrase «what other commenters»

I have to echo what other commenters have said about Apple's customer service being the most accessible thanks to their retail presence.

I'd be interested to hear what other commenters might propose — there are probably many more possibilities, especially where the courts and law societies are concerned.

This is a huge hidden cost for renewable energy that goes beyond what other commenters have said.

alphagrius, Thanks for admitting that you don't even bother to read what other commenters here post — or if you do read it, you don't understand it.

While I totally hear what the other commenters are saying about marketing to kids (you made the point as well), I missed their suggestions for other ways to make eating real fruits and vegetables cool (I am positive that almost anything mom and dad suggests stops being cool between the ages of about 8 and 22).

From what other commenters have said, temperature could definitely be an issue.

HMMM... very interesting... what other commenter routinely writes like a first grader?

Not exact matches

For example, what if the next commenter is really offended by my remarks and, buried within a set of criticisms, calls me an idiot or some other personal pejorative?

For all the commenters telling Christians to stop telling others what they do, all of these men and women are Christians INSIDE the church looking to improve themeselves.

I've known Jesus for as long as I've known my name, and still I use other people like capital to advance my own interest, still I gossip to make myself feel important, still I curse my brothers and sisters in one breath and sing praise songs in the next, still I sit in church with arms folded and cynicism coursing through my bloodstream, still I talk a big game about caring for the poor without doing much to change my own habits, still I indulge in food I'm not hungry for and jewelry I don't need, still I obsess over what people say about me on the internet, still I forget my own privilege, still I talk more than I listen and complain more than I thank, still I commit acts of evil, still I make a great commenter on Christianity and a lousy practitioner of it.

What does that have to do with the other commenter's intent?

:) None of the other commenters have mentioned an aftertaste so I'm not sure what that could be.

I know in «16 (I wasn't here in «16 so don't know what was being said) commenters in other places were very down on him and wanted him gone.

At the online dating site PlentyofFish's forum, one wise commenter writes, «If your SO [significant other] would be deeply hurt, ticked off or kick you to the curb for doing it... what difference does it make what you call it.

I tracked down the commenter, Patrick Sanders, and learned that Healthy Vending supplies schools and other locations with what it calls H.U.M.A.N. (Help Uniting Man And Nutrition) machines.

Since some other commenters have also brought up Charlie Rangel as evidence that Democrats have failed to «drain the swamp,» I have to ask what planet are you people living on?

As some other commenters here, I am wondering what your take is on Dr Brian Clement's claim that blending destroys up to 92 % of the nutrients in smoothies?

Uh, dude, just one small correction, because the other commenters basically already said the majority of what I had to say.

As many of the other commenters, I would love to know if you'd consider The Jayride Journal to be listed too — we're in the «waiting to be discovered» phase, but we combine useful travel tips from 24 hour itineraries, to travelling with children, what to do if you lose your passport, and how to beat jetlag, with just a sprinkling of wanderlust in there as well.

I'm just hypothesizing over what I've gleaned from commenters on other sites, as well as those who left their opinion on my review of the game (see below).

Instead she tries to figure out for herself precisely what is happening by looking at a wide range of data and literature, and by investigating leads offered by other researchers and by commenters on xyz.com.

What I do not understand is why people play the Judith Curry style game of creating several posts filled with other people's quotations, making up hypothetical graphs, asking questions to the commenters, and playing ¨ what if ¨ scenarios in their head, only to back off and play the ¨ I'm innocent ¨ card when someone tries to call them out on the bulls *What I do not understand is why people play the Judith Curry style game of creating several posts filled with other people's quotations, making up hypothetical graphs, asking questions to the commenters, and playing ¨ what if ¨ scenarios in their head, only to back off and play the ¨ I'm innocent ¨ card when someone tries to call them out on the bulls *what if ¨ scenarios in their head, only to back off and play the ¨ I'm innocent ¨ card when someone tries to call them out on the bulls ** t.

So, if I write an article about this in Examiner (which no one reads anyway — ha), what do I say to the commenter who says, «Gee, every time I bring up the name of a «scientist» who disputes warming, I get told he's not an expert and doesn't know what he's talking about, so why should I believe this other non-climate change expert who doesn't dispute warming?

Other commenters can take on what they view as incorrect arguments or facts.

Given that I have a personal issue with Stephen Schneider - who, from what I know, was an excellent science communicator - being maligned on blogs, the relevant quote that is being mentioned by other commenters is

What I'm left with after my analysis is that I am somewhat uniquely called a troll and accused of thread - jacking because of combined attributes: I post a lot (mostly in response to other commenters), and most of my posts are oriented in a politically unpopular opinion at Climate Etc..

If Shewonk behaves better over here than at her own blog, well that is a good thing; other commenters are of course free to interpret her comments in the context of what she writes on her blog.

From what I have gathered from other commenters, it reads the maximum possible radiant power not the actual flux.

But I'd love to hear from any commenters who know of other ways those of us who are overseas can access the show - or simply folks who can share more about what was covered.

The problem is with your «gatekeeping» w / r / t his tribalism — as you don't allow yourself to recognize his tribalism for what it is, and as you don't allow others to point it out, even as you allow other commenters to pile on to his tribalism.

What multiple other commenters HAVE done, of course, is to utterly refute the multiple fallacies underlying your strident sloganeering that the technologies, efficiencies AND «behavior changes» needed to rapidly reduce emissions must necessarily impose «deprivation and hardship» on everyone.

Other WSJ Law Blog commenters say that Neuborne's $ 4 million request in a case involving $ 1.25 billion settlement fund is a drop in the bucket compared with what lawyers recovered in tobacco litigation.

Commenters also asked that other entities, including business associates, the Medicare program, and pharmacy benefit managers, not be required to provide access, in part because they do not know what information the covered entity already has and they may not have all the information requested.

Comment: One commenter questioned under what circumstances proposed § 164.510 (k) would apply instead of proposed § 164.510 (f)(5), «Urgent Circumstances,» which permitted covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials about individuals who are or are suspected to be victims of a crime, abuse, or other harm, if the law enforcement official represents that the information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and immediate law enforcement activity that depends upon obtaining such information may be necessary.

These commenters, however, were not in agreement as to what other period of protection should be imposed, suggesting various durations from 5 to 20 years.

Other commenters have wondered what source Yahoo! Finance is using for its data, with popular exchange Bitstamp mentioned as a possibility.

This is what happens when the very vast majority of Realtors does not pay attention to what is going on within its sales culture, does not care about anything other than the next commission cheque, does not read REM regularly, does not concern itself with pursuing anything more than the bare minimum of ongoing education requirements, does not care enough about what the majority of the public thinks about them, does not heed the warnings of professionals within the culture, does not heed the warnings of commenters on REM about this issue (over the past five years or so) and too often crosses its fingers when conducting double - enders, hoping that neither opposing parties to the transactions find out what was or was not said or revealed that should have been said or revealed.

An industry forum such as this is interaction among commenters, not just article specific; and this example contradicts what AM just posted and did so several times when attacking you and others.

But I also know what your other «commenters» are saying... we have a 9 month old crawling grandson and I think he'd like the carpet better too.

Like the other commenters, I am interested in hearing what the client did with his guitars and computer speakers.