Sentences with phrase «what other conclusions»

But also let's look at what other conclusions we can draw.
What other conclusion can an observe draw from hearing so much sound and fury?
What other conclusion is there?

Not exact matches

Clearly, in the absence of a miracle, poor project management will result in a project reaching an unsuccessful conclusion, but what is it that defines a good project manager and why are some project managers so much more successful than others?
And through his research on what separated the performance of Olympic swimmers from others who didn't fare as well, Dan Chambliss came to a similar conclusion:
What a simple test you just offered up to us «until I reached the most reasonable conclusion» if you reach any conclusion other than «there are no gods»... well, then we will undoubtedly know whether you are either a liar or just old - fashioned dumb...
As a conclusion, I would not die for no reason, HE was not insane, He knew what is on THE OTHER SIDE... Would you die for no reason????
... Only until what we are told and instructed on how to live by others - parents - society... As if none of us have a consciousness thought on our own conclusion of life... Something to think about...
5) while i agree with SOME of what you say about sacrifices, your other conclusions are patently wrong.
So I was not making any speculations, I was pointing out that if what you say is true, then anyone and everyone would be coming to the same conclusion about the same creator, instead you get 41,000 different flavors of one brand along with tens of thousand of other brands.
What the f# $ k other conclusion could one draw, other than these pukes are scapegoating our financial mess of the lower clases while kowtowing to the mega wealthy?
8] Recognizing the what the church REALLY is leads to other daring conclusions.
You by your own admission set it aside and go with what YOU THINK your god wants which you can no more demonstrate is the correct path than any other believer who does the same but does not agree with your moral conclusions.
On my intuitions, this conclusion would be convincing if indeed the very concept of a comprehensive telos implies what the critics assume that it implies, namely, that all moral norms other than the supreme teleological imperative are merely prima facie.
When I reflect on the infinite pains to which the human mind and heart will go in order to protect itself from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of religious belief which stem from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage in a philosophical critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its claim to cognition can possibly be valid — when I ask these questions of myself and others like them (as I can not help asking and, what is more, feel obliged to ask), is not the conclusion forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?
If you find that others arrived at the same conclusions you did, feel free to add footnotes to your manuscript so that you have support for your views, and also so that you can later go back and find what others have said.
Maybe instead of jumping to a conclusion about what I supposedly think of other polling groups, you might want to look at why you jump to that conclusion.
So the Zombies did not accomplish what they intended to with the song, other than proving they were very smart, or perhaps providing a fittingly dark conclusion to Odessey and Oracle, thereby making it more of a unified statement.
I don't want to rewrite this article in english, but basically, I came to the following conclusions 1 - that Scriptures ought to be used in close interaction with daily reality (not out the blue, in abstraction, or in academic ivory tower) 2 - it ought to be interpreted by what we could call «crucified» christians 3 - and that «crucified» christian should interpret in the context of a «crucified» community / church (because being in a close knit church is a very good way to actually be «crucified» and sanctified, and because I need insight from others in my interpretations.
Is it because others told you a story which appealed to you, or is it because you rationally and logically analyzed it and came to a conclusion about what you believe?
2) You can maintain your position from a faith perspective, and say this, but then I'd have to seriously question [a] your historical integrity (for example, the historical position of Revelations as canon, although more of a debate than the other texts, was still NOWHERE NEAR contestable enough for you to draw this sort of conclusion) and [b] your philosophical integrity (for example, if you dismiss Revelations because it doesn't support your position, i'm going to ask: by what authority do you think you have the right to discern this?
I studied the bible with JWs for many years before i came to the conclusion that we have the accurate knowledge of the bible and help others come to know what the bible really teaches.
How, therefore, since our inheritance from Jesus is to be included among all the other aims at our fulfillment out of the past, and not with the ideal aim from God, are we to avoid the conclusion that we must either devalue Jesus» aim at our fulfillment in maximizing the route of inheritance from God or devalue the ideal aim from God should we choose to maximize what Jesus would afford us?
i already know what i think / believe / know, and being curious i like to see what other ppl think and what conclusions in life they have come too.
The fact that different schools of thought have come to different conclusions after reading the same bible does nt seem to register with many christians who effectively hold to the position «My doctrine is what the bible teaches so the other view is wrong».
I can't prove God's existence just as much as scientist can't prove the big bang... there is evidence of both but to reach a conclusion takes faith... one side leaves hope and the other does not... maybe I'm agnostic too because I don't claim to know everything about why I'm here, I have to have faith... Honestly, I'm sick of the extremes on both sides... the conservative judgmental Christian, who never thought through things as to why the believe what they do (ie Dinosaurs, cavemen, evolution, etc.) and the intellectually arrogant atheist and humanists.
What conclusion two alludes to is Hartshorne's quite explicit assertion that the categories always require some contingent divine final cause or other through which to be manifested:
But Sartre's analysis leads to the conclusion that each individual is enclosed within himself and going out of oneself to the other, which is the meaning of love, is really impossible.4 If, against Sartre, we say that love is possible, what would be the conditions of being which it would require?
The practical conclusions derivative from this third view of what is modern in political economy are diametrically opposite to those drawn from the other accounts.
But what I detect in it is the work of someone who was never all that interested in investigating the arguments on either side of the same - sex marriage debate; whose scant interest in it has now been fully exhausted, both intellectually and morally; and whose present conclusions hover in mid-air without anything to support them other than a wistful regret that he has lost a hoedown partner in a gay man who has come fairly unglued over the issue.
I will never consider it rude to state what the logical conclusion should be according to your attempted deduction, to demand a similarly logical deduction in support of any and all seriously made claims by others, to call out the bullshit when someone fails to do so, or to respond to people behaving like idiots, making idiotic statements or trying to argue without sufficient intellectual abilities, by calling them what they are: idiots.
«I believe that Luther, Calvin, and many others would tell us to read scripture afresh,» says Wright, «with all the tools available to us — which is, after all what they did — and to treat their own doctrinal conclusions as important but not as important as scripture itself.
Also, what occurred at Abu Ghraib was not shown to have occurred at any other facility where interrogation was conducted, and so his conclusion that the abuse was «connected to the conduct of interrogations,» which nowhere appears in the Taguba Report, does not follow from the available evidence.
Some of his work is quoted by others in papers and articles I read so I know there are others greatly concerned abut what he is doing here, not just antagonists like Troubleunderfoot, who by the way, is asking Jeremy to really consider the logical conclusions of what he is trying to teach.
Instead of viewing one model of morality as superior and the other as inferior, Gilligan advocates valuing both in mutual conversation — thus, of course, embodying in her own conclusions the development she has traced in her studies of women.9 There is a remarkable accord between what Gilligan cites as women's experience and the ontology of process philosophy.
Wengers job during that period was to maintain CL football and a profit, well I have come to that conclusion after looking at the facts surronding what has actually happened rather than rumors, he is paid well because he managed to do something which other managers have failed at... being a selling club and still maintaining regular CL football.
In conclusion, I see progress on the transfer front, but what I'm seeing doesn't look any different from other clubs..
NOW my biggest concern is seeing SANCHEZ, slowly but surely he has been fading away lately, just like OZIL did, what is wrong I don't know, but I have a clue, because it happened to other players that came to play our Coach, make your own conclusions
Along with the findings that the main cause was a lack of police control, and that there had been significant alteration of statements and other attempts by the police to pass the blame on to the fans, was the conclusion that in 41 cases «what happened... after 3.15 pm was significant in determining the outcome.»
i'm often faced with the question «what have you achieved with your so called branded beautiful football» and in my quiet time, i think about it and i came up with a conclusion that all teams vie for one main reason,» to win trophies» which we have lacked in the last six years.As an Economist, i understand Arsene wenger's mentality, philosophy, youth developmental project, rebuilding and most especially, the sole aim of puting Arsenal's financial stability in order but he should also understand that the only consolation we fans get after paying to watch Arsenal despite the high ticket prices which's about the costliest in the league is winning trophies, the ability to say amongst other footballing fans that we have a great squad that plays good football and win trophies.That's what i'm talking about!!!
This is apparently more than any other club but I am not sure what conclusion, if any, we can draw from it.
In other words, our ultimate goal is to encourage our children to adopt an inquisitive outlook regarding why they do what they do, not to discreetly put our thumb on the scales and blunt their minds with our predictable (and sometimes drearily determinate) solutions to and conclusions about their problems.
My hope here is that by looking at the research that is being used to form opinions on bedsharing, I can show you what is involved in the research and allow you to come to your own conclusion about the real risks inherent in bedsharing versus the risks of other factors interacting with bedsharing.
If you were an Iranian strategic planner, what conclusions would your draw about the respective fates of other states singled out for post-9 / 11 pariah status by Uncle Sam — North Korea made it to the nuclear finish line, Iraq and Libya foolishly gave up?
I like to draw my own conclusions but I also like to read what others have to say.
What science, what arithmetical calculation has led Cameron to the conclusion that a reduction by any number other than 65 would be injWhat science, what arithmetical calculation has led Cameron to the conclusion that a reduction by any number other than 65 would be injwhat arithmetical calculation has led Cameron to the conclusion that a reduction by any number other than 65 would be injust?
Thank goodness that there is still some part of our parliamentary system from which it remains possible to speak from outside the nasty but inevitable union between, on the one hand, what has always been the anti-parliamentary New Left and, on the other hand, the sociologically indistinguishable New Right's arrival at hatred of Parliament as the natural conclusion of its hatred of the State.
Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance Jr. made clear that he is still looking into the Independence Party and other money donated through their housekeeping account in an «ongoing» investigation, although he was firmest in saying people shouldn't jump to conclusions about what he's looking for (i.e. Mayor Bloomberg's 2008 presidential race spending).
The other study in Nature — led by Joerg Schaefer of Lamont - Doherty Earth Observatory and Columbia University, and colleagues — looked at a small sample of bedrock from one location beneath the middle of the existing ice sheet and came to what appears to be a different conclusion: Greenland was nearly ice - free for at least 280,000 years during the middle Pleistocene — about 1.1 million years ago.
That means that although it can give scientists a rough idea of what the common ancestor to all living apes and humans would have looked like, drawing other meaningful conclusions could be challenging.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z