Sentences with phrase «what other consequences»

(And what other consequences would we then face?)

What other consequences might there be for revolving a balance?

And what other consequences might they have?

Not exact matches

As a consequence, investors feel a strong impulse to do what others are doing.

With the impending end of organic reach, what are the consequences for marketers and others who use Facebook to connect with their communities?

The concept of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater than our sin and greater than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks of the sexual immorality in corinthian church of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer than overcome by sin.brentnz

So — if / when the Dictators» deeds become evident that they have engaged in evil and inflicted harm on others — what constitutes appropriate consequences for their special Commenders?

It is the consequence and measure of what existentially we are, and the manner we relate to the «other» in which we swim like fish; the «other» in which we are immersed.»

To encourage implementation, positive and negative consequences should be specified for each person, in addition to the positive satisfaction of what the other agrees to do — e.g., a back rub or no back rub; golf or no golf.

What a beautiful touching story of selflessness, compassion and putting others lives first over one's own safety at the risk of unimaginable consequences if found out.

What looks like a logical contradiction is resolved in life, for not only the Bible but our own experience tells us that to forgive others as fully as we can is both a condition and a consequence of divine forgiveness.

Today as i was thinking about Jesus sending the demons into the pigs and i thought God is not punishing but judging and he made a decision.This idea came from your other discussion which i believe is what he does he decides to make a judgement call he is sovereign and it shows his tender heart and mercy that not a single person was afflicted.The pigs unlike men have no soul so have no eternal consequence upon them they live and they die.either way they were going to get killed.We can be assured that Gods judgements are right and just the pork was going to the gentile nations who worshipped other Gods and no doubt would have been offered to idols so there is a consequence when we disobey the Laws of God even even when we do nt know or understand his laws.brentnz

The resurrection of Christ is a way of affirming that God has received into his own life all that the historical event, designated when we say «Jesus Christ», has included: — his human existence as teacher and prophet, as crucified man upon his cross, in continuing relationship of others with him after that death, and also what has happened as a consequence of his presence and activity in the world.

If the fashion in which the basic New Testament proclamation has been interpreted in the preceding chapter has validity, then talk of the resurrection of Christ is a way of affirming that God has received into his own life all that the historical event, designated when we say «Jesus Christ», has included: his human existence as teacher and prophet, as crucified man upon his cross, in continuing relationship of others with him after that death, and along with this what has happened in consequence of his presence and activity in the world.

At the human level, there is what we style «sin» — willful choice, with its consequences, of that which is self - centered, regardless of other occasions, content to remain stuck in the present without concern for future possibilities — and this is an obstacle which is like an algebraic surd.

In other words, the desirable is what is desired by one who takes account of circumstances and consequences.

While his account is often sloppy, he is nevertheless right that the transhumanist agenda is a logical consequence of Gnosticism (which he and many others mistake for Christianity), and that this Gnosticism, which has theological roots in the Scotist - nominalist revolution in metaphysics, ever more exclusively shapes the modern cultural imagination and our understanding of what it is to be human.

I really feel for those who are struggling with adultery and it seems the reoccuring question is the same.Will God forgive me if i have committed adultery and the answer is yes we all are sinners and we all have sinned no sin is worse than the other to God.If you are feeling bad because for what you have done then it is the holy spirit drawing you to him repent and turn from your sin.God wants all of us to draw near to him to get our hearts right to stop making the same mistakes over and over again.If you feel weak he gives the strength to deal with it rather than trying sort it out on our own.He forgives us because he loves us but we may have to bear the consequence of our sin like David and his family suffered for his choices regarding his affair with bathsheba but God forgave him for his sin.

What I decide becomes a datum for others and the consequences of my decision a part of their objective world.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

Why should we be surprised when the natural consequences of what we or even others have done visit themselves upon us?

Others have accused the Pope of superficiality, of not thinking through the consequences of what he is saying.

The consequence might well have been a greater concentration than ever on our desperate effort to avoid personal death no matter what happens to others.

This is why we have to have yield signs in our roads, some people just go no matter what the consequences to others.

Parents are urged to develop an atmosphere of mutual respect; to communicate on levels of fun and recreation as well as on discipline and advice; to allow a child to learn «through natural consequences» — that is, by experiencing what happens when he dawdles in the morning and is permitted to experience the unpleasantness and embarrassment of being late to school; to encourage the child and spend time with him playing and learning (positively) rather than spending time lecturing and disciplining (negatively), since the child who is misbehaving is often merely craving attention and if he gets it in pleasant, constructive ways, he will not demand it in antisocial ways; to avoid trying to put the child in a mold of what the parent thinks he should do and be, or what other people think he should do and be, rather than what his natural gifts and tendencies indicate; to take time to train the child in basic skills — to bake a cake, pound a nail, sketch or write or play a melody — including those things the parents know and do well and are interested in.

No, what seems most likely in light of other uses of anathema in the Bible (See my Gospel Dictionary Course for explanation of these texts) is that certain Corinthian teachers were saying (while supposedly under the influence of the Holy Spirit) that the reason Jesus died is because He was suffering the consequences for sin, or for living in a sinful, human body.

Instead, there are consequences in this life (loss of relationships with others, loss of health, even loss of life), and consequences at the Judgment Seat of Christ where we experience shame and loss of eternal reward (this is what Paul is talking about in 2 Corinthians 5:10).

They want guidance from nothing but their own conscience and desires so they can be free to make their own decisions and do what they want, regardless of the consequences to other people.

Having made the decisions we have made and having become what we are in consequence of those decisions (although obviously other factors have entered in as well), we can not evade or avoid appraisal in terms of them.

I have seen what female abuse can do to men first - hand, it is emotionally devastating and can create one of two psychological consequences in men — one is a combination of anger and difficulty connecting to others and the other is a never - ending desire to please a woman for whom he is never good enough.

What does happen is that the desires and wishes of the praying person are gradually purged of self - centered and selfish elements; he comes slowly to see that he should pray, for his own condition and for others, for «an increase of faith, hope, and charity» — as the Prayer Book collect for Trinity XIV puts it — and in consequence come to conform his own desires and wishes to the ongoing purposes of God.

While the research in this area is still only suggestive and probably does not apply to the high - demand markets, it corresponds to what has been noted in relation to the lack of growth in overall religious programming as a consequence of paid - time programming and other syndication characteristics for religious programming.

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

I want glory — I pray for it in my own atheist way — but honestly not sure what the answer is — we appear to be stuck between two stools — on one the one hand there is the well - run club, Corinthian ideals, attractive football, generally competing or being there or there abouts, being respected in the wider community etc and on the other hand wanting to join the new age idea of a football club and «f $ % k this for a game of soldiers and lets just deal with this by spending mega-money and sod the consequences brigade».

If the situation with this last penalty is raised for analysis at high level there will be no consequence: nine out of ten officials will say it was a clear penalty and let's consider this: what if it was the other way around?

Unicorns and candy - floss buildings aside, the realist in me constantly wonders what the long term consequences of Henry's (possibly successful) loan spell are and why the Gunners had to rely on a 34 year old veteran when being faced by a pedestrian opposition that would have been annihilated by any other team in the running for a Champions league spot.....

Logical consequences, on the other hand, are what's given to a child by a parent or caregiver when the child misbehaves or breaks a rule, and are ideally linked to the bad behavior.

The study, titled «Chocolate Milk Consequences: A Pilot Study Evaluating the Consequences of Banning Chocolate Milk in School Cafeterias,» examined what happened when chocolate and other flavored milks were removed from the cafeterias at 11 Oregon elementary schools.

Topics • Positive home climate • Simple rules to help stop trouble before it starts • Power struggles — what, how, why and when not to engage • Six critical life messages • Discipline and punishment — why one works and the other only appears to work • RSVP — reasonable, simple, valuable, practical consequences • Mistakes, mischief and mayhem • Three kinds of families — brick wall, jellyfish and backbone • Keeping your cool without putting your feelings on ice • Buffering children from sexual promiscuity, drug abuse and suicideType your paragraph here.

Dr Stern added: «However, other research suggests that incurring repeated head impacts can lead to long - term consequences, and we should be doing what we can at all levels in all sports to minimize these repeated hits.»

* If your child bullied others or acted out in the classroom, set up some guidelines for what you expect of him or her socially this year, along with consequences of what will happen if he does not comply.

GMOs are unlike any other form of pollution ever created by humans, and we have no way of knowing what the long - term consequences of altering our food sources this way may be.»

In other words, ask your child what the consequence should be for breaking a rule.

Discuss and reflect with them about their choices and the outcomes — When natural consequences occur because of his decision not to share (you have to talk him home from the park because he refused to allow others to use the swing, or his friend became upset because he wouldn't share his toy) discuss and reflect with him about what happened and whether he's happy with the outcome.

A lot of things we've been told are best turn out to have other consequences, and those are conversations we NEED to have... if we truly have what's best for the patient (human or canine) in mind.

What consequences have resulted in the past for parties (or other political movements) which promote independence referenda, but go on to lose them?

What happens if activists can tie human rights horrors like the this one with other consequences of the same kind of lawlessness, like the impending extinction of African elephants in the wild?

But there were other reactions — the SPD's candidate for the Chancellorship in 1990, Oskar Lafontaine, was critical of what he saw as Kohl's outmoded nationalism and warned of the economic consequences of unification.

But while those actions may actually create politically useful space to the president's left, the other consequence of disillusion is what polls have found to be deepening apathy among Democratic voters.

«Logic would say that other members of the Legislature have heard and seen what the consequences are if you do wrongdoing.