Sentences with phrase «what other creations»

my mind is thinking about what other creations we can build!

Can't wait to hear what other creations you come up with, Jes xoxo

Not exact matches

Once your marketing and sales efforts are aligned, and internal stakeholders have a clearer picture of what is working, it's time for your sales engineers and other subject matter experts to support marketing in the creation of powerful content.

Could you detect what was trending and then grab stuff from other places and turn it into an article synthetically where the cost of content creation would be zero?»»

No doubt there will be plenty of other absolutely crazy creations made in the game in the weeks and months to come, and we can't wait to see what fans cook up next.

Other than putting «money back in the pockets of «some» (but certainly far from all) Canadians what have these tax cuts done for the economic growth, job creation, and the general well being of all Canadians?

There are many factors to be considered when discussing job creation in a new emerging industry, and there's no better way to get a clear idea of what's going on than to cooperate with other individuals who share a similar vision with you.

What's intelligent about destroying your «flawed» creations (and every other living thing that liveth) on a populated world, rather than killing 2 flawed beings (Adam & Eve) then starting over, AT THE BEGINNING?

What i mean by this is that if u read the creation story in the bible, there is no mention that god created the solar system with the sun in the center, with the other planets, with us in the milky way galaxy, and all the other billions of galaxies.

So herbert, the many forms of cancer (or pick any other disease) must all be the creations of your god, from what you are trying to say, since he supposedly created everything.

No but they do disprove the creation myth used as the credentials for gods — without those credentials what other evidence do you have?

Science is confirming what the Bible says - the Big Bang (the creation), the idea of other universes (God is not of this universe), the human genome project («the language of God» according to Francis Collins), quantum mechanics, etc..

If the purpose of existence was something other than what God established by creation then you and I are in the same boat it does not happen to be the Ark..

It's a way to justify what you don't yet understand, rather than acknowledging that it's just understandable at the moment, and it's acceptance amongst those who think like they do, it's the creation of a definable «evil» to fight against (satan, atheists, other religions, basically everyone except their small group of like minders... even other denominations that are nearly identical quibble).

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

Just knowing the size, the cultural prominence, and the public influence of the evangelical community, I was particularly interested in what the emergence of the ECI and other creation...

And, at the same time, to be fair, what you may perceive as a «Love Story by God» and take it «literally» others perceive it at best, a book of fiction, with some good words of wisdom now and then, to at worst, a book of an insane deity who demands obedience, among other ridiculous things, and... sent «himself» to die for «us» as we are «broken» and «flawed» / sinful» creations, and by sending his - self... if... we just «believe» we go to eternal paradise with him.

What better time to show forth the womb and the tomb, the waters of creation, Noah, the Red Sea and the Exodus, the crossing over Jordan and all of the other visceral, visible, primal, primordial images of our faith?

and Justin Topp with «If you could discuss one topic and one topic alone in a course on science and religion (other than evolution vs / and creation), what would you choose and why?»

The context of Genesis 1:26 - 27 gives us the best clues as to what is meant by «image» and it probably refers to the things that set us apart from animals — our intellect, emotions, will, authority to rule over creation, desire for relationships, and other non-physical attributes and characteristics.

The facts of creation in this as in other matters do not of themselves constitute a command, only an indication of what is fitting; and the various forms of ethical unwisdom and indignity which do not transgress explicit commands can not be categorized as sin.

As Hannah Arendt says, «What saves the act of beginning from its own arbitrariness is that it carries its own principle within itself, or, to be more precise, that beginning and principle, principium and principle, are not only related to each other, but are coeval,» 2 We will want to consider the act of conscious meaning - creation, or conscious taking responsibility for oneself and one's society, as a central aspect of America's myth of origin, an act that, by the very radicalness of its beginning, a beginning ex nihilo as it were, is redolent of the sacred.

In other words, what is God doing in the whole creation, not just in human existence?

If we engage in the «de-mythologizing» of the Revelation to St. John the Divine, as we must also «de-mythologize» the creation stories in the book Genesis in the Old Testament, we realize that what is being said is that as human existence and the world in which that existence is set has its origin in the circumambient, everlasting, faithful Love that is nothing other than God — we recall Wesley's hymn, quoted a few paragraphs back, that «his nature and his Name is Love», and Dante's great closing line in The Divine Comedy about «the Love that moves the sun and the other stars» — so also the «end» toward which all creaturely existence moves is that very same Love.

@Tom, Tom, the Other One «If only there were a God, a Creator God, to infallibly dictate to us out of its infinite knowledge of its creation what sin is and tell us why we must avoid it.

If one asks, what are the possible roads to a world without war, that essential way - station on the way to freedom of information in anecologically organized world, Arthur Waskow answers that there are five: (a) Control of the nation - state system through stabilizing the balance of power and reducing international tensions but keeping the weapons; (b) Reform of the system through total disarmament without abandoning national sovereignty or the pursuit of national interest; (c) Extension of the system through the creation of a federal world government; (d) Fragmentation of the system through increases in the power of extra-national associations and Institutions across national boundaries, and corresponding decreases in state power as these occupational, industrial, scientific, and other groups gradually expropriate from the national governments the power to make decisions within their own fields; and (e) Abolition of the system through substituting love f or coercion.20.»

But Jobs» adage that people didn't know what they needed until you tell them proved truer with this invention than with any single other creation of his, and 10 years later, the iPhone hasn't just transformed the world, it's transformed the way we take the world in.

Some of the theologians of the older orthodoxy would agree but others would say that what the Bible tells us about creation for example, can be adequately understood on its own apart from a reference to the incarnation.

The Augustinian conception should rather be remembered, in which the creation of what is assumed, is merely a factor of the Logos» self - manifestation, an instrument of his self - utterance into the sphere of what is finite and other than himself.

If it is possible in this way to regard the creation of the soul by God as a case of becoming through essential self - transcendence, because this latter concept formally includes what is meant in the former by creation, then the origin of the soul possesses its distinctive, unique character, in contrast to any other origin through the agent's self - transcendence by the fact that here the self - transcendence occurs in the direction of an absolutely unique individual being, spiritually unique.

What place is there for tilling and keeping in the perfect fellowship and unity represented by God's work, in this creation in which there is no division, when everything has a part in everything else, when each fragment is not just a fragment united to all the others but also an expression of the total unity of a creation that reflects the perfection of its creator, when the bond between the Lord and the universe is of such perfection that the Lord's rest is the equilibrium of his creation?

I am not a programmer... but I survive in my field and provide for many others I am an agnostic that refuses to argue evolution vs. creation — who cares... it will settle nothing I do not care what awaits me when I die — I will love for doing good today.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

In fact it contradicts itself starting in THE VERY FIRST TWO CHAPTERS of Genesis when the order of creation is mixed up to having only 2 of the 4 Gospel writers bothering to talk about the birth of Jesus (and those two accounts conflict with each other while also providing timelines which make it IMPOSSIBLE for Jesus to have been born based on their accounts) to 3 of the 4 Gospel writers not agreeing on what the final words of Jesus were.

What the biblical understanding of creation rules out is not any scientific account, but other interpretive statements, such as «God is nature» (pantheism), «the world is essentially unreal» (Hinduism), «matter is ultimate» (materialism), or «the world is evil» (Schopenhauer — and some forms of existentialism).

As I understand it, Alan Guth's work, and that of others exploring the first microseconds of what people of biblical faith know as Creation, builds on Lemaître's insights.

On the other hand, we recognize that all earthly governments partake, to a greater or lesser extent, in what the Bible calls idolatry: substituting the creation for the Creator and the earthly ruler for the true God.

Why should that possibility be viewed as anything other than the makings for a creation, once again, out of nothing in total violation of what God anticipates ideally for the universe?

The choice was to be honest about it to myself and others, and to accept it as a part of what makes me a person created in the vast image and likeness of all God's creation.

In other words, Noah learned what it is to be a creature in relation to other creatures in a network of care, in a creation dependent upon God.

We won't be promoting the creation of new tools, but learning about what others are doing (including new tools), but also a lifestyle of showing and sharing the love of Jesus.

In other words, you'd like me to regurgitate countless hours of what's already been posted here time and again to include bible scripture that contradicts itself from the stupidity of the creation myth (there are two versions in the first two chapters of Genesis) to the words of jesus which contradict prophecy from other writings in the bible?

This «what» is seldom the «what» others know; it is in part my own free (and thereby ununiversalizable) creation.

The truth is what will result from your mind and heart but to think you need to Lisen and Read and ask who know if you didn't know... May God Guide and bless all in faith of God Almighty Allah the One and onoy creator of all creations the God of all (Jews / Christians / Muslims) who worship no one other than God alone and follow the roads leading to learn the truth nothing but the truth, so help me God.

This requires what Paul Tillich calls «deliteralization» — in other words, moving beyond the symbolic stories (such as the creation myth and Jonah) to discover the glowing, self - authenticating truths - for - living which are visible only when one escapes from wooden literalism.

That Protestantism and other religions will and ought to play a role in the creation of this new reality in American life would be argued for by most Christians; however, both the way this is to be done and the content of what should be done would be interpreted differently by various denominations.

So, while those things are permitted in the world, I don't think that a woman being a doctor to save my life applies to God's creation order, other than her PREACHING the Good News, which is what we're ALL required to do, but not necessarily Pastor a flock...

The Bible is inspired in that it reveals what God was whispering to people who wrote Scripture, and to people in other parts of the world who were also responding to the revelation which they had received from God (whether it be through creation or conscience).

Isn't that what got us the six day, talking snake Genesis accounts and the thousands of other creation myths that people have made up over the ages?

On the other hand, they complain against what Luther called «the left hand of God»: the divine bungling that blotches an otherwise splendid creation.