Sentences with phrase «what other subjects»

What other subjects can use VTS to teach content?

What other subjects can eCommerce websites cover in their blog to bring in qualified traffic to their website?

In a different more academic vein, we had occasion to look at restitutionary remedies on Friday and my colleagues were delighted with the depth of UCL's restitution site at http://www.ucc.ie/law/restitution/restitution.htm What other subject specific hoards do we use?

Not exact matches

Once your marketing and sales efforts are aligned, and internal stakeholders have a clearer picture of what is working, it's time for your sales engineers and other subject matter experts to support marketing in the creation of powerful content.

Davidson said it remains to be seen what kind of educational approach works best — one with a separate personal finance curriculum or one where personal finance issues are interwoven with other subjects such as math and English.

What's more, withdrawals from HSAs for anything other than qualified medical expenses are subject to income tax, plus a hefty 20 percent penalty tax.

Facebook has long made clear that it does not allow people to buy and sell prescription drugs, marijuana or firearms on the social network, but the newly published document details what other speech on those subjects is permitted.

«If you know a lot about wine or nutrition or salsa dancing or email marketing or any of a million other subjects, people who care about that topic are sure to be interested in what you have to say.»

Kosinski's team then compared the results with all sorts of other online data from the subjects: what they «liked,» shared or posted on Facebook, or what gender, age, place of residence they specified, for example.

«He's an egomaniac devoid of all moral sense» ---- said the society woman dressing for a charity bazaar, who dared not contemplate what means of self - expression would be left to her and how she would impose her ostentation on her friends, if charity were not the all - excusing virtue ---- said the social worker who had found no aim in life and could generate no aim from within the sterility of his soul, but basked in virtue and held an unearned respect from all, by grace of his fingers on the wounds of others ---- said the novelist who had nothing to say if the subject of service and sacrifice were to be taken away from him, who sobbed in the hearing of attentive thousands that he loved them and loved them and would they please love him a little in return ---- said the lady columnist who had just bought a country mansion because she wrote so tenderly about the little people ---- said all the little people who wanted to hear of love, the great love, the unfastidious love, the love that embraced everything, forgave everything, and permitted everything ---- said every second - hander who could not exist except as a leech on the souls of others.»

It doens» t have a consistent theme or message or mission statement... the musical catalogue of Bob Marley holds together better than that mishmash of contradictions and highly unlikely scenarios written by people who although they were ignorant on ALL other subjects were somehow experts on this god... what a laugh

So personally, I think they got exactly what they deserved for opening their mouths and complaining over 4 busses having a simple basic add that is not offensive at all except to those who believe they have the right to DICTATE (derived from Dictator) to others what they can and can not do and who SCREAM bloody murder if they are subject to the same rules they themselves wish to espouse.

Of course, all that Paul VI did, as Anscombe among many other unapologetic Catholics then and since have pointed out, was reiterate what just about everyone in the history of Christendom had ever said on the subject.

Jeremy it just hit me like a bolt of lightning i am so excited about this thought that salvation has nothing to do with eternal life but is speaking of losing the ability to be an overcomer in Christ.Having been there as a carnal christian i always believed in Jesus but i felt i did nt have the power to live a christian life so i felt like a hippocrite i was still subject to sin and sinful desires.So in that sense i had never received salvation because i had never been an overcomer in the first place.So i can see how a christian could lose there salvation having once walked by faith but that does nt effect there eternal life in Christ.Just so others know i am now walking by faith and am an overcomer i know what it is like to experience the power of the holy spirit and to not be overcome by my old nature that is what Jesus wants us all to experience rather than being a victim of the enemy.Whether we are an overcomer or not does nt effect our eternal life.brentnz

So Huebert, if I understand you correctly you are saying that given a reliable subject with a genuine experience, there is no subjective way to determine that his observation and experience are anything other that what he claims.

So what you are trying to say is that your god has taken over from all the other 3500 + gods and because some translation of some old bs I am one of his subjects — truly you are deranged if you believe that sh!t.

Woman's singular strength arises from her awareness that God entrusts other eternal subjects to her and even where modernity has resulted in a «gradual loss of sensitivity for man, that is for what is essentially human», maternal love must «ensure sensitivity for human beings in every circumstance: because they are human!».

What other forum than this one to best discuss the subject matter.

«Whatever issue may come before me as President, if I should be elected, on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject, I will make my decision in accordance with these views - in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be in the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressure or dictates.»

The logical model in terms of which the mind with its ideas, and substance with its attributes were conceived as unified wholes was that of the subject with predicates, which also had become something quite other than what it had been for Aristotle, since universals were no longer thought of as «forms.»

Other subjects discussed at the classes included: habit, anger, suggestion, insomnia, nervousness, what the will can do, and what prayer can do.

In all other cases, what is becoming (subject) can not at the same time be being (object), and Whitehead refused to make any exceptions.

That is certain to shape the school's decisions about which subject matters to stress relatively more than others in its course of study, which courses to include in what sequence.

In its own statement demanding the inclusion of RE in the English «Baccalaureate», the CES professes quite a high - flown idea of what is to be gained from this subject, a vision which I suspect that many of those who have undergone the reality in other words, have direct experience of what is actually on offer in our Catholic Schools, will be hard put to recognise:

And also HeavenSent, marriage can be for two people who love each other and don't wish to be fruitful and multiply, and who have no interest in what the Bible says on the subject.

A new whole is «created» or «comes to be» at transition when what was subjective for two or more preceding others, is immediately objectified for a new subject.

Others, while more like blogs, are just as credible as what some guy posts in the message board section of an opinion piece on the subject of religion.

To point to another's supposed sin, is a sin of ignorance, blind by distorted perception, that is other than the clear Self looking at the subject through unconditional love, what «one» should perceive this way is the suffering and / or needed help.

He took «sympathy» as basic in his concept of prehension, or what memory and perception have in common, the feeling by one subject of the feelings of other subjects, as theirs.

It may be true that what Johnson and others consider «the very best» of modern theology has been «engaged in executing modernity's turn to the subject,» but maybe those theologians have been wrong.

@ JohnR: To paraphrase a teaching I once heard, if I told you that everyone in the world was subject to the law of gravity, you now have the choice to reject what I say and jump off a cliff to prove me wrong, or you can live your life subject to that and take caution around cliffs or other falling hazards.

Hence bits and pieces of the totality of things can become the subject of an academic discipline that can then develop suitable methods of study with little attention to what is happening in other disciplines.

In other words, if what God, or any other subject, knows might not have existed, then God, or the subject in question, might not have had that knowledge.

The reasons for such sermonic silence are varied, ranging probably from a fear of being thought morbid through a fear of sounding other - worldly to a fear of not knowing what to say on so moot a subject.

The subject thus looks to that other person to inform him of what he should desire in order to acquire that being.

«Whatever issue may come before me as President, if I should be elected, on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject, I will make my decision in accordance with these views — in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be in the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressure or dictates.»

The scientists involved then asked some of their subjects to do things that might change their beliefs, like write a paper arguing for the other side» the article mentions capital punishment» and found that people tend to change their beliefs and at the same time change what they thought were God's beliefs.

The great advantage of such an approach is that it constantly reminds students that ideas do not exist in a vacuum, that what can too easily be presented as immutable facts are subject to revision, that science quite as much as any other subject is liable to paradigm shifts.

There is much in it that the evangelical should take seriously and yet it is characterized by what seems a perverse refusal to accept the authoritative Biblical witness without first subjecting it to existentialist and other historically conditioned mutations.

Each post subjects your ideas, interests, and feelings to the scrutiny of other people, who through the anonymity of the internet are more likely to tell you exactly what they think.

It's interesting to think about morals and how we are such moral creatures.There are very few conversations, especially when the subject is about a particular behavior in ourselves or others, that don't involve a value judgement.We're even willing to bend the rules as to what is right / wrong... sometimes stealing and lying can be good things....

Whatever issue may come before me as President — on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject — I will make my decision in accordance with these views, in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressures or dictates.

The result of this is that the «thinker» occupies an altogether unassailable position, from which he is able to discern and pronounce upon the limits of every other discourse (scientific, metaphysical, religious, cultural, or what have you), without himself being subject to critique from any other quarter.

For example, if we are subject to being affected by what others say or think about us, we are at the mercy of their responses to us.

How could we get them interested in writing, 1/66 of a book, where there would be no collaboration or knowledge of what the others would say, no particular subject matter to expound upon, could we really get them interested in such a convoluted project?

The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should raise questions about the meaning of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.

What he can not understand is that Yahweh is not a God like all the rest, that he is in fact a Wholly Other, that he is not subject to the common measure, and that when he confronts what men call god the only possible issue is the annihilation of the gWhat he can not understand is that Yahweh is not a God like all the rest, that he is in fact a Wholly Other, that he is not subject to the common measure, and that when he confronts what men call god the only possible issue is the annihilation of the gwhat men call god the only possible issue is the annihilation of the gods.

Either human beings are made subject to the State or they are typically cast as «individuals» — with little meaningful or intrinsic relationship to each other or any agreed notion on what it means to be a human being.

Ambivalence occurs when we achieve something other than what was intended even though we do get what was sought.23 Subduing nature and subjecting it to our wills has led to destruction of the environment.

How about you guys all post a fact going against what you believe, just to show that you have researched the subject fully, all sides and understand that others may believe differently and are justified in doing so.