Sentences with phrase «what other writers»

Remember that when you are looking what other writers are doing, the goal is not to copy them exactly.

Pekkanen also learned what other writers have learned: «Authors didn't have to wrestle over scraps of media attention; we could boost each other instead.»

You've done what other writers, including myself, dream about!

It's amazing what other writers can catch, as well as what you learn from reading other's works - in - progress.

I'd love to hear what other writers have to say to the question: do your characters talk to you while you're writing their story?

If you're a seasoned writer you've probably run out of damns to give about what other writers think of you.

Check to see what other writers are charging.

So, what other writers have influenced you, and how?

What other writers / books remind you of Munaweera's style?

It's why I'm so interested in learning how and what other writers and / or artists of any nature do.

Instead of bashing each other, they support, retweet, like, reply, and show genuine interest in what other writers are doing.

I really love Poe and I just wanted to see what other writers thought of Poe.

What other writers have been compared to Hemingway?

Reading what other writers and industry influencers are sharing on your topic, as well as «listening» to the questions, concerns and feedback that they are receiving from their readers is a golden research — and relationship building — opportunity.

«Find out what other writers are saying about the publisher you are considering.

What other writer, having just finished Moby - Dick and standing at the peak of his powers, would have taken in his next book a simple story about a young man's descent in the city and compounded it into the unreadable, pseudo-Hawthornian mess of Pierre?

What other writer would have taken an opening sentence as good as «Call me Ishmael» and buried it behind the ten pages of small - print quotation with which Melville begins Moby - Dick?

What other writer of the Bible refers to the concept of multiple heavens?)

Not exact matches

«It might seem like I built my business overnight, but what people don't know is that on the marketing side, It took me years of building a network of food writers, chefs, magazine editors, and other people in the industry,» echoes Luuvu Hoang, founder of Txiki Plaka restaurant.

I love that about the show, but what I also love is that I get the opportunity to meet great people: Cohosts, contestants, producers and editors and writers and all the other people that make the show... it's a great group of people.

The last few decades have seen the banking and financial sector evolve beyond what Marx or any other 19th - century writer imagined.

On the other hand, there may be those who can come to contemplate what the mystical writers have styled «the stark vision of God in himself.»

For purposes of classification, therefore, it would perhaps be most accurate to think of Davies as a writer of Christian apocrypha: a novelist who finds himself uncomfortably restrained by the canon of Christian thought, but who is not, on the other hand, a heretic; a self - proclaimed moralist who holds that while we reap what we sow, it is often difficult to know the nature of the seed or the outcome of the harvest.

This political system is what writers in the nineteenth century called the ancien régime, because Catholics had no living memory of any other order.

What did Paul and the other writers of the New Testament try to impress upon the readers of their letters?

The Jewish writers of the New Testament introduced the «ecclesiastical attitude» and other distortions that led to what Rauschenbusch calls «ascetic Christianity,» a religious attitude that thinks in terms of heaven, divine intervention, and personal salvation rather than social justice.

I honestly and truly try my absolute hardest to always reference and footnote and give credit to other authors, thinkers, writers, bloggers, and theologians when I know that what I am writing originated with them.

Some indeed are recognizably identical with sayings reported in the other gospels, though the wording may differ because the writer has his own linguistic habits, and sometimes he gives what seems to be a different translation of the same Aramaic original.

In addition, on a closer examination of the dialogues and discourses it often turns out that the writer is only spelling out, in his own idiom of thought, what is already implicit in sayings reported in the other gospels.

I remembered Brennan Manning — the man who has translated the love of God in a way that I could receive it more than probably any other writer — was addicted to alcohol and I re-read up one of his last books before he died: «All is Grace: A Ragamuffin Memoir» where he vulnerably writes about what this battle has cost him, even as he experienced the unending and unconditional love of God in the midst of it, how he experienced regret and pain and loss alongside of the love and tenderness of God in this dependency.

But most of all, like many other writers and artists with whom I've spoken, I'm struggling a bit to process what's happening.

Matthew knew what John knew — John did not have a higher evolution of understanding of who Jesus claimed to be than the other apostles — it is just in the wisdom of God as He used each writer to convey understanding to the folks who received the letters and for our benefit in the ages to come that Matthew focuses on different things than John.

Oftentimes these teachers and writers contradicted each other, and so nobody ever really learned what the passage truly meant.

In fact it contradicts itself starting in THE VERY FIRST TWO CHAPTERS of Genesis when the order of creation is mixed up to having only 2 of the 4 Gospel writers bothering to talk about the birth of Jesus (and those two accounts conflict with each other while also providing timelines which make it IMPOSSIBLE for Jesus to have been born based on their accounts) to 3 of the 4 Gospel writers not agreeing on what the final words of Jesus were.

Studying the Bible, the original languages, the cultural context, what the writer was trying to say to his original audience and how they would have understood it, and other similar considerations may help us develop a better «paper theology».

I probably stopped reading 50 or so pages in and got back to other good Russian writer, s or maybe Virginia Woolf (whose writings, for what it's worth, are a huge influence on my life — if not my politics).

One aims to find out what the writer actually wrote; the other attempts to understand what he wrote in the light of his circumstances.

what is what if these scrolls writers (assuming they r independent from each other or from different times) were just writing like a fairy tale story.

There are certainly some great insights into what it means to be Christian given to us by other New Testament writers and by ancient teachers.

More than common circumstances, however, what drew me and so many other young writers to L'Engle was her articulation of the writing life as a sacred art.

Perhaps most significant about her book is that whereas other writers focus on what happened to them in their transition to motherhood, Steingraber focuses on what's happening to the baby, not only biologically but environmentally.

The writer links 1Cor14: 34 with other texts without even knowing what they say (eg: Paul did NOT state that women should wear head coverings (v5 etc etc)-- if you read a LITTLE further down to Verse 15 he confirms that «head covering» refers to a woman's hair — and (original Greek translation) he does even not state whether it is long or short, just that she should not shave her head.

Jesus the Son of Marry (Peace and blessings be up on him) is known today to the Christian world as it is being described by John, Paul, Luke and others... whatever the way these human imagined him became the faith... record shows that the first book of NT was written at least 60 - 80 years after Jesus the son of Marry was taken away from this earth... and these writers used their vision as a weapon to get it to the brain of mankind... also there are debates among the Christian scholars that no one knows who is the writer of some of the gospels... someone else wrote it and used the names what we see today... i.e. no one knows when and who and how the Hebrew chapters were written... despite of lots of controversy on this, Christian scholars uses them to teach others...

In other words, what you're saying is that the revelation God sent to the Biblical writers was good, but they corrupted it?

All the other books, non-cannonical as well, could be gathered together as «everything said before Jesus, by the Jewish writers, and everything post Jesus that was written about the early church, or early writings that were not specifically what Jesus said and did.

Two other words were available to convey this particular meaning, if that's what the writer had in mind: nepel and sakal.

Paul is not only aware of these things; he is perhaps more responsible than any other scriptural writer for teaching us these things; i.e.; what it means to be a sinner.

Do you believe that God also «inspired» writers from other cultures to write what they did?

[P.S. - I think this might be an interesting question to pose to some other writers / bloggers (like we did with «What is the gospel?»).

So when you lean on what other men have thought up by their own reasoning, you will fall short of God's truth, the writers of the Bible were influenced by God, The Holy Spirit to write what they wrote, they did nt do this to reveal their own truth, they did this to reveal God's truth.