Sentences with phrase «what point in the future»

Not exact matches

Choosing the right tools means having a clear understanding of your core objectives, the pain points that are getting in your way, and what the future looks like for your growing business.

That misses the point of what a post-PC world is — it's a future where computing is made invisible and divided into different devices in different situations (until we get that direct brain - internet connection, that is).

And Fink points out there are going to be similar U.S. success stories in the future no matter what happens on the macroeconomic level.

Vision statements articulate what the company aspires to be at some point in the future.

The first is probably the largest one, which is I'm chairing a group of the Financial Stability Board that is looking at fintech to see what kind of issues in the future the regulators and supervisors will face from a financial stability point of view.

I understand that startups normally need capital froman an IPO or need to issue more stocks in order to finance R&D (well, as just about all companies pursue immediate profits not at the cost of the future, the second option is becoming forgettable), but what's the point when the whole world is now run by a few corporate cartels?

In the most recent assessment, the City has stated that they have redefined project boundaries to minimize impacts on the abandoned Mill Creek channel, but they haven't addressed the more important point — what about the impact of the project on potential efforts to re-animate the channel in the futurIn the most recent assessment, the City has stated that they have redefined project boundaries to minimize impacts on the abandoned Mill Creek channel, but they haven't addressed the more important point — what about the impact of the project on potential efforts to re-animate the channel in the futurin the future?

But what's perhaps more noteworthy is the dovish shift in the Bank's tone since their last announcement in September (where they raised rates by 25 basis points) and its more cautious stance on future policy rate adjustments.

The one thing I can assure you there are no dead atheist because they know for sure what we will all find out at some point in the future, the truth about the here and after.

For example, at one point, Maher voices his opinion that modern «Christianity,» with pastors wearing expensive suits and watches, driving fancy cars, and preaching in giant buildings, can not be what Jesus wanted for His future followers.

will have to be assumed and telescoped; but I will concentrate on what I think are critical questions — critical in the sense that they represent, at least in my opinion, points on which greater clarity is required if the community of Christ's discipleship is to move into the post-Christendom future with something like apostolic confidence.

yo tom tom, ur what i like to call a lost cause, only the Lord himself could change your point of view, so why do nt u get out of here at least John has a future in his afterlife

But psychologically this dichotomic process, whereby at each point of choice something like a new spiritual species breaks away, is influenced throughout by a final orientation which qualifies or obscurely dictates each of the earlier choices: «In what direction and in what form are we to look for this new state of being which we expect to be born of our future developmenIn what direction and in what form are we to look for this new state of being which we expect to be born of our future developmenin what form are we to look for this new state of being which we expect to be born of our future development?

I am not scared of a really small man telling me there's an invisible, inaudible, intangible man standing behind me who will pound me at some undefined point in the future if I don't do what that small man tells me to do right now.

This reply here is just what you wanted, not exactly as you wanted it, but really, it's all there... blast away... and understand that it's right... and God is there... and you reject no matter what is told to you... at any point in time, past, present or future... so it makes no difference who said it, or when you're told.

In the future I will try to preach less and point to what others say, but I had....

«From this point on, there is a growing realization that man's future may be literally what he chooses to make it, and that the range of choice and the degree of conscious control which he may exercise in determining his future are unprecedented.»

She points to an example of a plumber, years into the future, helping a homeowner utilizing augmented reality glasses: «You put on these glasses; you connect with them via Skype or some other messaging service and they can literally draw on the wall in front of you in order to show you what you need to do to sort of fix the plumbing issue.»

For what point can there be in living with eyes fixed constantly and laboriously upon the future, if this future, even though it take the form of a Noosphere, must finally become a zero?

I trust words to indicate what is within a person, and that there is something going on behind those words that I can expect to see at some point in the future.

In his book Surprised by Hope, N.T. Wright notes, «The point of the resurrection... is that the present bodily life is not valueless just because it will die... What you do with your body in the present matters because God has a great future in store for iIn his book Surprised by Hope, N.T. Wright notes, «The point of the resurrection... is that the present bodily life is not valueless just because it will die... What you do with your body in the present matters because God has a great future in store for iin the present matters because God has a great future in store for iin store for it.

My central point now is that it is only in light of this theory of Whitehead's own intellectual project that one could do what Lewis has now proposed doing: show its completion or fulfillment in his own theory of God as the subjectivity of the future, a profoundly difficult and complex notion discussed at greater length in other essays by George Allan and Robert C. Neville in this Special Focus.

We recall what God did in the death and resurrection of Christ in the past, which points us to a future without pain and death but holds us here and now - that is hope.»

I am sure I will learn a lot more in the future as I continue to write and publish books, but this book contains what I know up to this point.

Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29

According to The Independent, Chalobah is set for showdown talks with Chelsea boss Antonio Conte in the coming weeks, at which point he will likely clear up his future and figure out what his next step should be.

Lets run Manu at the point because he had 0 pts, 0 from 6 shooting or Bertans 5 pts in 20nd mins or Anderson 5 pts in 17 mins, all these guys over 6» 5 and taller that can't score we should break 60 by the end of the game Two of your Munchkins score 30 pts at around 50 % shooting, let Murray run the point sorry he is no where near ready and to be honest I don't think he has what it takes to be the future PG, the only thing I could agree with you is not playing the 3 together (Mills, Parker, Forbes) and giving White some minutes

I agree that Mair only getting about 3 minutes is a little silly, but I think Tedenby is really an important future player for us, and whats the point in screwing with his development, if the season is lost?

we were awful for 60 mins and fortunate to be just one down and the good... we took a point from being decent for 30 mins all but securing third place... As for realism it's simple... There is no way a real arsenal fan could watch that performance and be confident that we will be challenging for title in 12 months time... So if that is what we want the realist fan asks what needs to change... and if we rule out the first best option... which as a realist I do... to get rid of wenger... then in our second best world it's a matter of where we need to strengthen... Sadly at the point realism breaks down because in the absence of first best option we are in the fantasy world of the cheese eating surrender monkey where 11 yr olds are zee future of zee club

Only point I disagree on is the DM point, we cant see what will happen in the future and I for one would rather have a player at the same level in Le Coq's position and man manage the situation than leave it open should Le Coq get clattered and be out for several months and have to rely on Arteta to fill that role for an overtly long period, yes we can use Rambo or Jack in the same role as Le Coq but does that not restrict our options in other area's?

Just analyze Wenger's statement today, «I didn't come out against Benzema», its not the same as saying that I did not show or I don't have any interest in Benzema, and to top it off when ask about ruling out any future purchases (this within the context of an additional striker) Arsene pointed out what he currently has at his disposal and think they are sufficient, while adding that if an opportunity to strengthen presents itself, he would not be adverse to pursue it; this seems a bit contradictory and points to someone who is being a bit evasive.

the club is in a great position and it is in part due to wenger, no - one argues that point, but unfortunately world class players don't look at what your stadium size is or how financially stable you will be in the future, they want to win big trophies (and make dolla).

lol calm down son, i'm mad as hell, but i ain't reading all that, that is what we call a article (book / atlas of words) this is a comment section, so be a little less delicate when someone points that out in the future.

Stats may only point towards the past instead of giving a reliable indication of what will happen in the future, but if you're a fan of spotting trends that may or not be developing, there seems to be encouraging news for Gunners supporters ahead of this evening's match.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I wouldn't use them as point of reference for what we can «look forward to» in future windows.

Overall, our MMU Swimming club finished ninth in the BUCS points table for the weekend and has two swimmers in the top 10 rankings with Liam Selby in eighth and Martin Schweizer in tenth position, rounding off what was a very successful weekend for MMU Sport in 2016, with the future looking bright for the 2017 Championships.

Add the fact that Atleti are still in contention for the league title as well as the Champions League in what is a critical point in their campaign, Griezmann's future beyond this season is likely to be the last thing on his mind.

Of course, after leading what appears to be a smear campaign against Freeman and thoroughly destroying any chance of the quarterback rejoining the team at any point in the future, the Bucs don't exactly have much trade leverage.

It will be s buyers market so kroenke will be after a bargain, usmanov does not need the money so will sit tight and see what happens in the future, perhsps kroenke will want to sell at some point and usmanov will buy.

What the ESPNU 150 Watch List defensive back, future U.S. Army All - American and top - ranked student in his high school class forgets is pointing out shapes and colors well before the average 3 - year - old typically could.

Pardew, Poolis, Fat Sam, Hughes — what is the point of continually employing managers you know will probably let you down in the near future?

Fair play to the UTD fan for having an opinion, I think a lot of people miss the point with Wenger, I know that all football fans want success now, if you look at the teams Arsene has built this is perhaps his third, even forth, and it is still in the making, he knows that they are not yet what they will be and that perhaps we will not get success immediately but if we are patient success will come, I am a realist and know that mortgaging your clubs future for immediate success is wrong and that sooner rather than later these birds will come home to roost.

In an idle moment, he wondered what he would present to the LEA if he were home educating his children at some point in the future, if they demanded some kind of learning plan for the yeaIn an idle moment, he wondered what he would present to the LEA if he were home educating his children at some point in the future, if they demanded some kind of learning plan for the yeain the future, if they demanded some kind of learning plan for the year.

What it actually means is they'll be a holy terror to their parents till some indefinite age far in the future when they gain enough maturity to focus their intensity, at which point they will invent electricity or the internet or solar - powered airplanes.

But in welcoming this, Sarkozy was at pains to point out the distinction between the much greater economic policy integration amongst the euro 17 countries, and what he called the «confederal» future that the wider, still enlarging EU faces.

Many people have made good points both for and against the stable futures of Pakistan and India, but increasingly the comments have moved away from political analysis and towards what could be considered to be xenophobia, which is a form of debate that Politics In Spires can not support.

«I think we need some help at this point, and what the future holds time will tell,» del Lago owner Tom Wilmot, a Rochester mall developer, told USA Today on Tuesday as he visited the state Capitol building hat - in - hand.

Meantime, Mayor Rosamilia says he is taking decisive action: «And what I'll be doing in the future, I'll be calling another special council meeting so that we hope that we can work together, get the rate down to a point where everyone's comfortable with the rate even though it may not be able to exceed the cap but lower than the current rate.

One of the most worrying things about the deal from my point of view is that our capacity to influence what happens in the future is diminished by the deal — because we've said that we won't stand in the way of further integration.