Sentences with phrase «what point that decision»

At what point that decision will be made can only be approximated at this time, but the Twitter rant is a telling tale of how toxic the cryptocurrency community has become.

Not exact matches

As your business grew, at what point did you realize you couldn't make every decision... and was making the transition to a higher - level form of leadership difficult?

They didn't review what decisions were made, by whom, at what point or why.

His question to them: «If I'm completely stupid in a world that is changing beyond recognition, in ways that we can not imagine at this point in time, and we do not take account of it in our decision - making, what is the likelihood that I will end up with value at risk?»

Getting an understanding of what your business is worth is important to do early in the process because this is the starting point for many decisions.

«The big decision point is: «What is your current tax bracket, and what do you expect it will be when you retire?&raWhat is your current tax bracket, and what do you expect it will be when you retire?&rawhat do you expect it will be when you retire?»

Most pipeline - management training revolves around technical training on using a CRM system, but what managers really need is training on making better pipeline management decisions — for instance how to determine the ideal pipeline size for each rep. Managers need to know at what point in the sales process their actions have the biggest impact.

What Lazy CEOs like my friend do is figure out the key point of constraint to success as quickly as possible as a way to make the best possible decisions.

No need to think about what your decision will be at this point, just explain what's happened so far.

At that point, «you have to make a conscious plan to share as much information as possible — what your sales are, what the strategy is, why you're making certain decisions,» says Roberge.

And far from suggesting people should try to rid themselves of all emotional influence in their decision - making, the paper points out that learning to pay attention only to those feelings that are relevant to the decisions being made is what counts.

Maybe it would be a good decision to sell your bonds, maybe not, but wasn't the entire point of the bond ladder to take away the guessing game of what's going to happen with interest rates?

This is not a realistic starting point, because the real world comprises individuals who make decisions for a myriad of reasons and can only be understood by drilling down to what drives these individual actors.

What we often notice is that fundamental analysis rules when it comes time to make decisions in relation to entry points.

So, then what is the point of even campaigning for office when folks will just change their decision message after they get into office?

It's god - given information, information they wouldn't have gotten any other way, meant to influence their decisions (or what was the point of giving it?).

Alschuler points out that the «bad man» whose perspective was decisive for Holmes does not really care about predicting judicial decisions as much as he cares about what the law enforcement agencies will do if he tries to get away with a crime.

The point, (I learned a little too late,) is about protecting the heart of that young person until they are able to make informed decisions about what they want in life.

As Johnson points out, we've got a few years before he needs to actually make a decision but we can all smell what the Rock is cooking.

For one, the universe may only appear to have order, just as causation may only appear to actually exist, when in fact any given event may be said to have unlimited causes and we only limit are decision on what «truly» caused something to GIVE order to the universe — think about all the finger pointing that goes on every time something unexpected happens.

At some point the decision has to be made to just go for it, regardless of what others say.

Nobody is responsible for what he could not know, or be, or do: yet to sin is to continue in self - will and self - love at those many points of decision in which, for a normal person, one's outlook and action ought to reach far beyond himself.

Janet i think what you have said is quite insightful and you are right and there is another meaning to Go and sin no more and that speaks to me of repentence making a decision to Follow Christ the one who saves.The words Go and sin no more is referring to a continual ongoinging process of living for Christ rather than dying in our sins daily there is no comparison.I thought that was awesome pointing the law back to all of us for we all have sinned and the judgement is death but Jesus came that we might have life in its fullness.Many people only see the adulterer when she portrays who we are as sinners that he came to save all of us sin is sin and the punishment is death so again you are quite right people use the scriptures to judge and that was never Jesus intention.I hope that helps when someone uses that scripture incorrectly and you can you use it like Jesus did to point it back at those who judge i hope that helps.brentnz

I don't deny that wrong decisions were made at probably all of the councils at some point, but of the councils that truly shaped Christianity, the seven ecumenical councils, while they are ridden with strife and political maneuvering as well as true Christian devotion and worship, I believe that most of what they decided in terms of doctrine is not wrong.

The Decision was not made by any scientific study it was a personal decision that took H0m0s off the DSM and in turn since you cant seem to follow this the DSM is what most physcs use so in turn they like you parrot a view point so they also chime in that is how sciencDecision was not made by any scientific study it was a personal decision that took H0m0s off the DSM and in turn since you cant seem to follow this the DSM is what most physcs use so in turn they like you parrot a view point so they also chime in that is how sciencdecision that took H0m0s off the DSM and in turn since you cant seem to follow this the DSM is what most physcs use so in turn they like you parrot a view point so they also chime in that is how science works.

Which is, of course, one of the points we have to keep making about Pius XII, who had to make excruciating decisions about what to say and what not to say, because people would suffer and die if he said the wrong thing, but who receives from his critics no such understanding as Roosevelt receives here.

In any case, our inquiry at this point must ask what sort of «theology for the social gospel» will square with the eternal truths of the Christian faith and thus be adequate to throw light on the decisions required of our time.

At what point do you stop over-thinking things, determine you're making a good decision and make a jump?

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

R. G. Usher has pointed out that the bishops did not possess the right to appoint the men they were expected to govern, the prerogative of determining what sort of men they should be, or the power to discipline them once they had been inducted.74 The decision as to qualifications for ordination had been taken from the bishops by the State, while the right of nomination to a parish post, after ordination, was largely controlled by lay patrons, and the bishops were forced to induct the nominee if he met the most meager requirements.

I think it is possible that the entire FO could have made different decisions that would have given us a few more wins, but honestly what would be the point?

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

They know what I ask so they have a starting point, how difficult can that be for them to make a decision?

I believe tgere are 3 titke contenders this year Leicester, city and arsenal About Leicester they are doing great but there football depends on counter attacking and few quick passes to reach the ball to mahrez or vardy i don't think they can impress anybody if they faced teams that park the bus like what the teams do with arsenal and also any injury for mahrez or vardy will ruin there season so i don't consider them a real challenge and in an open game we got the best out of them and beat them with 5 goals to 2 so calm down gooners About city they had very impressing start for the season then they were vety baf winning most games by pure luck or last minute goals and they could be beaten easily Arsenal are the best team form we controled most of the games and the losses and draws were by bad referee decisions or bad luck and the 4 points margain with city could have been easily 10 or 12

Fans, however, are more focused on the bizarre decision to bench Kolasinac for what is arguably a must - win game after dropping points against West Ham.

I don't agree with what the Arsenal keeper Szczesny's dad had to say, or at least his decision to speak out, but he does have a point and I do feel a bit sorry for the Polish international, because he has been exposed over and over again.

Maybe I am reading too much into what happened in one game, but some terrible one sided decisions by the referee and his assistants yesterday absolutely gifted the three points to Man United and that sort of thing became so normal with Old Purple Nose in charge at Old Trafford that we stopped complaining about it.

Your decision to isolate certain aspects of what makes up the entire tanking experience, and dismiss others as «irrelevant» misses the point that none of these things are done in a vacuum.

I am happy we got the 3 points which is all i care about, sometimes we have to win ugly, we shouldn't have lost to stoke this season as well if not because of the match official decisions to cancel Casette's goal we could have at least gotten a draw out of that game but guess what?

Let's face it goalkeepers tend to march to the beat of a different drum and Szczesny certainly fell into that category, but most of his antics were relatively harmless and simply reflected a certain level of immaturity that isn't uncommon for someone thrust into the limelight at such a young age... lord knows we've seen that happen with numerous players throughout the years and very few were ever banished for such behaviour... the only on - field action that drove me crazy was his inability to take a deep breath and not try to rush the play with an ill - timed throw at certain points in the game when common sense suggested holding the ball and slowing things down... the fact that he continued to do this probably had a lot to do with the glaring lack of coaching time spent with the goalkeepers... ultimately he made the fateful decision to take his frustrations out into the public sphere and paid dearly for it... in the end, his services were wanted by several of the best Italian squads, which is significant considering the historical importance placed on the defensive side of the ball in Serie A... all I know is that if someone asked me to pick the most athletically gifted goalkeeper we have had in our squad since the arrival of Wenger, without hesitation, he would be my pick and for that reason his departure is more than a little disappointing... what else is new though

id like to see him stop with the weirdness that he's been displaying in later years no one can deny what he's achieved for the club in his tenure with us But no one can deny either that some of his decisions have been appalling at some points what's wrong with suggesting that we need three more class players?

So what is the point in having the best in modern day technology, if he continues to make decisions that would normally be seen in a Sunday league Pub team?

2 games into season 9 players out wenger needs to take some tough decision whats point of having diaby if remains unfit all the time & same for myachi / coq / miquel

Im 100 % with you — from what I have seen — the actions of the Browns — the evidence would point to not only Sashi making the ill fated decisions on the QBs — but also implications that Hue may have had contrary opinions that were not in anyway final.

If [style points is] what's making decisions, then I'm going to stand by my comment from a week ago.

What is the point in constantly belittling the manager and saying everything he does is wrong, when in all honesty, I can't knock 90 % of his decisions this season.

Knowing what's normal will give you a starting point to make decisions for your baby.

For normal pregnant women, the decision is usually just «at what point should I tell people?»

I do meet many lovely parents that are so appreciative of what we do and become wonderful advocates for their baby, and become a partner in their care as they point out subtle day to day differences that help guide our decisions.

After I had my second, I dreaded the point at which I would have to make decisions about what to keep for the next baby and what to toss.