But he grew up [poor] so when I told him that was the style, he said that that's
what poor people wear when they can't afford new clothes.
Damn supply and demand If the demand doesn't dwindle then the price will not drop, as long as more than enough people are happy to pay the # 97 to fill the stadium then who cares
what the poor people think right?
What the poor people are asking / telling us is, unless we rethink the basic questions of life - style, the use of natural resources and the reaction between environment and development, we can not address the question of a new economic order.
What the poor people are telling us is that, unless we rethink the basic questions of life - style, the use of natural resources and the reaction between environment and development, we can not address the question of a new economic order.
Not exact matches
It's certainly a lot closer to driving the change Victoria's Secret claims it wants to see, instead of
what it's doing now which is maintaining the structure that actually keeps
people poor — and kids slaving away in cotton fields.
What the British
people haven't done is to vote to make us
poorer,» Khan said on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos.
That helps ensure that out - of - pocket costs aren't astronomically high for
poorer people — and that the plans have a minimum standard of
what they cover.
Put simply, the house plan, entitled American Health Care ACT (AHCA), essentially caps
what the government will pay to aid families and
poor people, and
what it will spend in total, regardless of how fast medical costs increase.
Still, even though more
people in
poor health reported high levels of stress than any other group, when all respondents in the «highly stressed in the last month» group listed
what contributed to their stress, a few contributing factors beat out health issues: too many responsibilities overall, financial problems, and work problems.
The rich habits study is really a five - year study of 233 millionaires, 128
poor people, and
what I found out was that wealth, success, being in the middle class, being
poor, is all about your habits.
«
What happens is the
people who think there's not very many
poor people take Sarlo's numbers and the
people who think there's lots of
poor people out there take someone else's numbers.
Many popular and famous speakers got a quick - start on their careers by teaching at adult learning centers throughout the U.S.
People like Robert Kiyosaki (Rich Dad,
Poor Dad), Barbara Sher (Do
What You Love and The Money Will Follow), Wayne Dyer (Your Erroneous Zones), and Cheryl Richardson (Take Time for Your Life) built their businesses this way.
People can argue just
what is rich,
what is
poor and such matters but the basic concept is quite clear.
At that point, it was about masturbation only (no one had made a comparison to homosexuality), so, without much personal stake in the debate, I thought to myself «See, this is why
people don't like the answers, not (always) because it doesn't let them do
what they want, but because the answers are sometimes very
poor indeed.»
Is this Pope's «man of the
people» approach (which I think is sincere)
what is needed to appeal to the biggest growth potential,
poor in Africa and Asia?
The murderer on - the - run preacher in The Apostle who founds a church where class and status make no difference, a congregation of displaced misfits who are
poor and
poorer, dumb and dumber, black and white, male and female, and fatter and fatter still, is telling
people who need to hear (because they can't read)
what they most need to know to turn their lives around: They can be saved, despite it all, if they believe in Jesus and «Holy Ghost power.»
This led to a big split among those that latched on to the words that having faith in Jesus is
what is needed to get to heaven vs words that say things like how it's easier to get a camel through the eye of a needle than for a rich
person to get into heaven or help the
poor.
Giving out contraceptives will not automatically make all the rich
people of the world share
what they have with the
poor.
What I meant by that was
people who were always trying to help the
poor materially, without imparting sound temporal wisdom coupled with the call of the Gospel.
Selfish libertarian John Stossel and Murdoch's propaganda arm, Fox News, are relentless in confusing
people about
what poverty means, cherry picking misleading and probably highly inaccurate statistics about how many
poor people «have» (not own, but «have») a refrigerator.
She would always appreciate
what people were worth, and it didn't matter whether they were
poor or whatever.»
The grandfather «practiced
what he preached» and took an active hand in visiting the sick and finding money to help
poor people.
What many do a
poor job of stating is that they blame
people's excessively fervent beliefs and devotions for causing the various atrocities they have caused throughout history, and the effect that the fundamentalist contingent has on the narrowing of modern societies view.
And
what's with all the high - horse crap about how democrats and republicans are evil and
poor people are lazy and not worth charity and everyone's religion is responsible for everything that's wrong?
I shudder to think at
what Jesus would have to say about our multi-million dollar church buildings while
poor people are living in cardboard boxes all over our cities and selling their bodies to get food.
Maybe then we can do
what Gungor pushed for in his original post, to be a
people who don't just «believe» in God, but through our faith do
what He has commanded us to do: take care of the
poor, the widow, the hungry and the needy.
I know
what they were for or did in the past none were for a tithe as a tithe was never money and
poor people didn't tithe
Do you not have any idea of
what more money means to a
poor person?
However,
what I don't get is
people that are anti-abortion and then don't support programs for the unwed mothers and the
poor.
I wouldn't be surprised if he worked with volunteer nurses and other staff who did the best they could for the
poor people without salaries... I wonder
what they will have to say about the good doctor...
It seems to us these examples that we gave were illustrations of
what were really egregious targeting of really valuable programs to the
poorest and most vulnerable
people in America.»
What I was doing (with others) was helping
people in crisis, helping alcholics and drug addicts, victims of abuse, the
poor, helping
people to escape the occult, those spiritually oppressed and abused, broken marriages etc..
This is, of course,
what the story of the
people of Israel is to the Jewish theologian,
what the story of black oppression is to the black theologian,
what the story of the
poor is to the third - world theologian.
What's most beautiful about these things is that they are accessible to all
people — the rich and the
poor, the educated and the unlearned, the privileged and the marginalized.
Truly, this is
what people keep implying, in saying we MUST have legal abortion, if only for the «
poor among us.»
Given that we are rich when the world is
poor, that we cling to our nuclear arms as if world extermination were a noble risk, destroy ancient forests, gouge the landscape, pollute the soil, water and air, that we copulate and abort with unrestrained abandon — how then are we to interpret Jesus» words, «It is
what comes out of a
person that defiles,» so as to come up smelling like roses?
What would be the reaction today if we used ethnicity as a means of pressuring
people to fulfill their pledge to the
poor?
I frequently hear church
people say that
people are
poor and homeless because that's
what they have chosen.
It is to take the black
poor less seriously than they deserve to assume that, unless white
people somewhere change
what they are doing,
poor blacks must live as many are now living.
What defines the inquiry as «theology» is its guiding goal, not the distinctive «methods» it employs (although it will be
poor theology if it employs inappropriate methods), nor the distinctive subjectivity of the
persons engaged in the inquiry (although it may be pretty thin theology if the inquirers are not personally «formed» by faith, hope, and love).
I «ll tell you
what Gingrich might call our president the food stamp president but he is more for the
poor people.
modern day europe: liberal democracies accept
poor people from muslim countries, and
what do they want to do?
At this point I was the equivalent of a
poor widow with an ill orphaned child.These
people knew exactly
what they were doing, but the
people they went to church with wouldn't know.
«
What our Congress is doing is hurting
poor people who have no voice to stand in front of you at the National Press Club and say, «Don't do this.
2) Original blessing says
what God created is good, we can make
poor choices (sins) but we can learn from our mistakes and encourage each other to be better
people.
Poor people are usually born generation after generation in
what most would consider poverty and they share
what little they have.
* falls over laughing * Please, Rush, tell us
what an awful
person that Jesus guy was, too, with his free health care and giving away food to the
poor.
Our choice is simply, a president who wants to 1) increase you taxes and
what everyone to pay «more» — coded as «fair share», 2) considers the
poor decisions of one
person to be paid for by others (everything from health care to welfare to immigration) and 3) has repeatedly lied to the american
people (i.e. benghazi).
The government often serves as the mediator in this transaction by taxing the rich, and then running the money through a vast array of bureaucracies until eventually, a small portion of
what was given finally makes it to the nameless masses of
poor people, many of whom do not even need the aid, are taking advantage of the system, or could otherwise work but choose not to.
That's part of the problem that you have... the record keeping at the time was
poor at best, then you have
people actively changing
what actually happened, destroying some record, some altering or creating new history.