This doesn't matter — the conclusions will hold no matter
what portfolio size you start out with.
Not exact matches
And I think that
what that said is we have a
portfolio of businesses we're investing in, and it's a really reasonably
sized portfolio.»
[1] The second piece of information was simply the confirmation that the reinvestment operations are proceeding on course, but there was no information provided on
what changes have taken place in either the
size of the
portfolio or its composition.
I'm wondering
what else your bond
portfolio constitutes of, and the
size of it?
As I then thought
what is stopping me from running a random Monkey
portfolio in real life and beating the index, a near guarantee according to this study, but I am guessing that trading costs will kill me very quickly due to the amount of buys / sells to the
size of my funds!
A more plausible stop might be five points or 10, in which case, depending on
what percentage of your total
portfolio you want to risk, you would need an account
size between $ 15,000 and $ 50,000.
Bring your
portfolio in line with that risk assessment: Once you have a sense of
what size loss you can handle without selling in a panic, you can then start making any adjustments, if necessary, to make sure your mix of stocks and bonds reflects the level of loss you can comfortably absorb.
They aren't a platform to brag about your
portfolio size, but rather
what you do with it.
However, I do not worry too much regarding the
size of
portfolio: some will start with $ 5K, others with $ 5M or $ 50,
whats really important is passive income and I keep track of it and regularly post them including my purchases, so, you can follow that.
What you'll pay in management fees depends on the
size of your
portfolio.
b)
What really matters is the variability of the ending
portfolio's
size - its cumulative return.
I'm a couple years older but have put together a
portfolio of dividend stocks over the past three years similar in
size and income to
what you have.
If you're looking for financial advice that's not based on the
size of your
portfolio, here are a few places to check and
what you can expect to pay.
But if we say that your mutual funds have a management expense ratio (MER) of 2.4 %, on average, then that is
what the cost works out to ($ 500,000 x 2.4 %) for a
portfolio of that
size.
Features Understanding
What Bond Market Liquidity Means for Your
Portfolio The ability to buy and sell with ease can be transitory and depends on both the market for the asset and the
size of the transaction.
In late 2007 my indicators showed me the deterioration that had taken place in many parameters of market health, plus my
portfolio had reached the
size where it made good sense to shift gears and become very conservative, and that's
what I did.
My
portfolio has a weighted MER of 0.17, but is becoming substantial in
size, so I was wondering at
what size do low cost index ETFs no longer make sense (if ever)?
Let's look at
what happened during the past year for each of the positions (in order of
size in my personal
portfolio):
Remember, since I don't follow my own advice and thus don't have equal
size positions (sorry Monish, I just haven't gotten there yet), the performance of my personal
portfolio is not exactly reflective of
what a
portfolio of equally weighted positions in each of the securities in the model
portfolio might have produced.
Amazing resumes and
portfolios come in all shapes and
sizes, so don't be afraid to makes yours unique and let employers know
what you're all about!
Regardless of your investing experience, the
size of your investment
portfolio or
what type of investor you are, Local Market Monitor reports will help you identify opportunities and take advantage of great deals in over 300 markets, while giving you peace of mind and confidence in your investment decisions.