Sentences with phrase «what real gas»

Not exact matches

What this means is that real estate crowdfunding sites and EnergyFunders — the first oil and gas crowdfunding site — must continue to offer their existing investment types only to accredited investors because Regulation A + is not an available avenue for asset backed securities to be sold.

May 3 - Rising costs start to squeeze American businesse CNN Money May 3 - Home Prices Jump Again And «$ 3 Gas Is Coming» Dollar Collapse May 3 - Gold price claws its way higher on Fed meeting and geopolitics Gold - Eagle May 2 - Q&A on SS Central America Gold Coins CoinWeek May 2 - Goldman says case for owning commodities has «rarely been stronger» than it is now CNBC May 2 - Gold, Silver See Corrective Bounces Ahead Of FOMC Statement Kitco May 1 - Gold Eagle Sales Still Faltering While Mining Output Collapses — Perfect Storm Daily Coin May 1 - Relentless USD Rally Is Precious Metal Kryptonite GoldSeek Apr 30 - Venezuelan Inflation: The Demise of Fiat Currency in Real Time GoldSilver Apr 30 - Silver Market Update Clive P. Maund Apr 27 - Finest 1913 Liberty Head 5 - cent coin will headline ANA auction Coin World Apr 27 - PCGS security features help police nab suspects in robbery case Coin Update Apr 27 - The Most Famous Coin of Antiquity — the Athenian Owl Coin Week Apr 27 - Gold gains but remains vulnerable after Korean leaders meet Reuters Apr 26 - The Era of Very Low Inflation and Interest Rates May Be Near an End NY Times Apr 26 - What Is Gold: Asset, Commodity, Currency Or Collectible?

GOVERNMENT «AFTERLIFE» FLASH MOB OR REAL SHOOTING IN UTOYA, NORWAY!!? stateofterror.blogspot.com / or stateofterror.wordpress.com / TEARS OF SORROW AND PAIN ON FACES OF MOURNERS OR TEAR GAS AND THEATER / HYPOCRISY ON FACES OF MULTICULTURALISM MANIACS!!? NORWEGIAN OSLO POLICE or COMMUNIST / LIBERAL CRIMINALS IN BLUE UNIFORMS WHO WERE PREPARING FOR TERROR AGAINST NORWAY ALREADY HALF DECADE AHEAD!!? No doubt about bombing in Oslo, but what about shooting in Utoya which was no different from the one in Arizona!!!? WILL THERE BE OBAMINATOR MORALES»S APOCALYPSE NOW OR TOTAL WAR AGAINST NEW WORLD ORDER (multiculturalism)!!? STOLTENBERG = BREIVIK (90 minutes vs 30 and for government vehicles or police even 20 minutes the most)!!!

this kid had it all and could have been truly great but guess what, you can take the kid out of the hood but you can't always take the hood out of the kid, sterling hangs around with a bunch of idiots who think posting their mate online doing laughing gas is clever and there all living in London, bringing him in would be a huge mistake in my opinion and those of you suggesting to offer theo and money, Im so glad you don't run the club, theo is the best r winger in the league when fit, we also have Wellington silva coming back, not to mention ox to cover or Sanchez if we want to play Danny or mezut on the left, let city have Raheem and let their already volatile dressing room implode, let's get Cech, lacazette and a solid dm to compete with le coq, sell Chesney to inter for good money podolski could be used as make weight for Morgan or the like release flamini let arteta and Roz have there last season if they choose or let them go if they want more first team football, Rio to have one more loan Diaby pay as you play and last promote chuba who clearly is going to be an animal, with this I believe the title is ours and if the new 3 settle a real tilt at the cl is possible but please gooners get behind theo he is absolutely essential COYG

It's what happened to Real Madrid the last time we faced them, just ran them out til they had no gas towards the end.

Cox, in what is expected to be the toughest GOP attack yet on Cuomo, will claim that the governor's nearly three - year - long refusal to authorize natural - gas drilling is a «metaphor for indecision and Cuomo's general refusal to face up to the real challenges facing the state,» said a source close to Cox.

I encourage Rob Astorino and Andrew Cuomo to take a real tour of fracking sites in Pennsylvania, from the citizens affected, not the gas industry which won't even allow journalists to see what they're doing.

Possibly the most famous scene in the film (from what I've heard) is where a tear gas canister is thrown towards the camera and you hear someone shout «look out Haskell it's real!»

The best bang for your buck in automotive history, a real joy to drive, easy to park so what more could a man ask for with this car you get a play toy, an awesome in town commuter, and a car you can take on long trips without having to worry about gas.

At speed, it works just fine, but stomping on the gas only to hear the engine rev impotently for a split - second while the trans decides what it wants to do is a real bummer.

When placing my Jeep gear it will jerk real hard, then when pushing on the gas the Jeep will hesitate and lose all power, I too drive to work in heavy traffic I am scared to death that I will be in a fatal accident, last year I took this Jeep to the dealership and explained what the Jeep was doing he explained to me it was bad gas, it now does this a lot, I once again took it into the dealership he explained to me this time that it was the transmission module which of course is not covered in Chrysler wonderful life - time powertrain warranty how Nice this is going to cost me a pretty Penny, so I have been reading on all these complaints about the same problem come on Chrysler recall

What happens is that when several dogs and several cats are put into the container, like a dark closet and gas is turned on... they don't go to sleep real quick....

I recently attended a Manhattan screening of «Promised Land,» a new feature film written by and starring Matt Damon and John Krasinski that aims to examine America's natural gas drilling boom as a case study in «what happens when real people and real money collide,» as Krasinski explained in publicity materials.

The University of Texas Energy Institute used a news conference at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science last February to roll out what it called an authoritative report separating the «real and perceived consequences of shale gas development.»

His video illustrates what carbon dioxide emissions from human activities would look like if you could watch the gas volume accumulate in front of you in real - time.

Companies that are opposed to mandatory measures will be unhappy with a real scientist going on television and explaining what is happening and what we must do to combat climate change (i.e. setting significant and mandatory greenhouse gas reduction targets), which, they think, will reduce their profit margins.

Re 392 Chris Dudley — while it makes intuitive sense that a spatially - invariant net photon flux could be sustained by a constant gradient in local equilibrium photon concentration (proportional to T ^ 4 for a grey gas, assuming constant real component of index of refraction), the calculation of what that gradient should actually be is made a bit more complicated by the fact that photons travelling in different directions will on average be absorbed over longer or shorter vertical distances.

What I am saying is that real, useful, competent action on reducing greenhouse gas emmissions will require an intellectual and emotional movement of great proportions, and my observation is that such movements do not arrise without leaders and heroes.

And / or what is your real - world proposal for limiting the buildup of greenhouse gases pushing on the Earth's thermostat?

The real news coming out of these talks is what happened outside the negotiating halls: massive protests at Germany's open pit coal mines with Pacific islanders standing in solidarity, governments joining a new initiative to power past coal, Norway's push to ditch oil and gas investments, and the emergence of non-state actors as a powerful force for change.

However, what the global averages with real world 2016 assumptions tell us is that already the average LCOEs for solar and wind are lower than their coal and gas competitors.

Compare with electronic transition absorption of visible light by the electrons of the molecules of nitrogen and oxygen in the atmosphere, the real gas Air, which is what gives us our blue sky, reflection / scattering.

That's why there is no sound in the AGW world because to get carbon dioxide to «accumulate for hundreds and thousands of years» they had to make it an ideal gas not a real gas — if you don't know the difference you can't see what they've done.

If you're actually thinking about what I've just said, you'll realise that the real world's greenhouse gases are predominantly nitrogen and oxygen, they are the bulk of our atmosphere and act like a blanket delaying the escape of heat from the surface..

In the real greenhouse which is our whole fluid real gas atmosphere which has volume, weight and attraction and is subject to gravity, the some 99 % nitrogen and oxygen dry air is what acts as a blanket keeping the Earth's heat from escaping too fast before the Sun again heats the surface, without water the Earth's temperature would be 67 °C not 15 °C — think deserts.

What they have actually done is taken out the whole heavy volume of the real gas atmosphere and replaced it with empty space populated by these imaginary «ideal gas».

Lomborg was quoted in an a web - piece entitled, «Earth Daze,» written by news correspondent John Stossel in Real Clear Politics, «The amazing number that most people haven't heard is, if you take all the solar panels and all the wind turbines in the world, they have (eliminated) less CO2 than what U.S. fracking (cracking rocks below ground to extract oil and natural gas) managed to do.»

To hide all their, both versions, shenanigans of using the real direct radiant heat measurements for their «backradiation by greenhouse gases» claim, they have had to create the fiction that visible light from the Sun is the source of heat and what we feel as heat.

If I've understood what he was saying in his thought experiment of model planet, and if my reading of ideal v real gases applicable in his thinking, then I'd say yes.

They're the adults now who don't have any particular interest in science but «remember the science from school» and so unlikely to question whatever the AGW green agenda pushes, and even those in actual science fields where real knowledge of gas properties isn't relelevant, but what I find astonishing though, is how many in actual science fields who come together to discuss AGW continue to not question something as basic as the difference between heat and light claims in the AGW energy budget which is well known still in the real science world.

They are going out of their way to explain they are trying to use what would be a real gas law as a reference instead of the ideal gas laws, plus an approximation of water vapor based sole on T which produces an estimated saturation pressure that can be super saturated or have a difficult to estimate RH or specific humidity.

But the debate is not well served by «denying» that the GHE itself is real, or by making absurd and obviously incorrect statements about trace gases not being able to help the Earth maintain its surface temperature well above its greybody value, or make irrelevant statements about «cold being unable to heat hot» (which is not what happens) or simply incorrect statements about the first or second law of thermodynamics somehow being violated by the GHE (which is absolutely trivial to demonstrate as purely false and silly besides, by doing a (gasp) actual computation of the entropy changes).

But he wholly fails to explain what the implications of the variability problem is (the need for overbuild of generation capacity and expensive / unfeasible large - scale energy storage), nor whether, if an effort is made to deal practically with these problems in real national electricity grids, the «increasingly cheaper» renewables will ever become cheap enough (when all relevant real - world factors are considered) and reliable enough (without natural gas «backup»), to actually substitute for and displace fossil fuels (or nuclear) at the scale required.

What we really have here is the inability of those pushing AGW's Greenhouse Effect to extrapolate from ideal gas to get the real world around us.

This is what AGWScienceFiction has done — it has built an imaginary Earth on the imaginary ideal gas for its AGW Greenhouse Effect and because it does not teach the difference between ideal and real gas the general population have a deliberately corrupted concept of the world around us, they do not know their arguments come from a fictional fisics so they can not see how physically impossible the world they describe.

And, because those being brainwashed with ideal gas descriptions with no teaching on the differences between ideal gas and real gases which have real properties of weight, volume and attraction, which have been given different names because they are different from each other, what we also have is the inability of those pushing the GHE to see the absurdities created by extrapolating from their ideal gas..

They no longer, from what I have seen on pages from universities, teach the difference between ideal and real gases.

Well, actually they can't, because they miss out what their maths can't describe — the actual properties and processes of real gases, which is why they freak whenever convection or gravity is mentioned..

As I've said, I don't understand what you're saying because it doesn't fit what I am arguing from or against; from real gases of the real world against the imaginary world of the AGW Greenhouse Effect created by ideal gas unconstrained by the individual volumes and nature of real molecules under gravity around them.

With all due respect, Rod, I see the ongoing transition to clean renewable energy sources through paying very close attention to what is actually going on in the real world, including for example the fact that for the last two years, in both the United States and Europe, more renewable power capacity was added than coal, gas and nuclear combined.

What indeed is the real underlying warming from human GH gas increases?

New post, 8th October: UK North Sea Oil Production Decline New post 18th November: Marcellus shale gas Bradford Co Pennsylvania: production history and declines New post, 28th November: What is the real cost of shale gas?

(I was taught in schools before AGWScience mangling, that's why I understand that real gases have weight and volume, and what that means for CO2 in our atmosphere which is heavier than air..)

You've claimed that the ideal gas laws don't apply in the atmosphere: «Just as an ideal gas has no volume etc. and so can not actually describe what is happening to a real gas which has volume etc.»........

Going after the non-real monopllies is a distraction so we won't notice what the real monopolies like oil and gas are doing.

Also, Eric Corey Freed, founding principal of Organic Architect in Portland, Ore., recommends real estate professionals learn what's available for environmental - and health - conscious consumers, such as recycled options that keep raw materials out of landfills, concrete walls that «eat» carbon to remove it from a room's air supply, and tiles that decoratively cover walls while eliminating contaminating gases for those highly sensitive to certain chemicals.

What's the impact of high gas prices on residential real estate?