Sentences with phrase «what real point»

There is always the fact that the new Kindle is coming out soon and will certainly have upgrades that make it stand out, but what real point of superiority is going to put it over the top right now?

@ 138 actually it does dude it ups the replay value of a game that you already beat that just got them like im tryin to decide which game to start playin on my shelf or start playin again but without the trophies its like whats the real point

Not exact matches

What's the point of having a website slider if only 1 % of people click on the item that is taking up your most valuable homepage real estate, especially when 84 % of those clicks are on the first item anyway?

The show cast six supporting «citizen journalists» who reflect the broad swath of personalities on the right, with a gun - rights activist in the vein of bombastic NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch, provocateurs in the vein of Milo Yiannopoulos, what Miller described as a «pseudo-intellectual with no real credentials,» and a stay - at - home livestreamer rambling without much of a point.

«Try to be a beacon of rationality by posing the «what ifs» to your boss, and point out the positives of the situation with real facts,» Taylor said.

«The process of execution includes real customer development, changing your product into what people actually want and tons of other hard work and learning moments that an idea - stealer wouldn't have in his or her arsenal,» points out entrepreneur Brent Goldstein.

«On the left side of the page, I write real - time notes around what I'm hearing — interesting, relevant points that I need to make sure I don't forget,» he says.

«What it did have was the fact it was solving a very real pain point in the hearts and minds of consumers,» says Ganenthiran.

«The point where you stop saying «yes» to everything, because now the bottles you threw in the ocean are all coming back, and you have to learn to say «no»» can be a real threat to actually doing what you love, he said.

What's the point of manufacturing a feud that's going to get a lot of attention, but that has no real depth or significance?

He has been pointed over the past several quarters to the fiscal side and pointing to Washington as opposed to the Federal Reserve in terms of what they can do going forward with tax reform with some type of stimulative fiscal policies that propel the real economy forward as opposed to monetary policy.

This is not a realistic starting point, because the real world comprises individuals who make decisions for a myriad of reasons and can only be understood by drilling down to what drives these individual actors.

Last year, for example, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that fiscal headwinds slowed the pace of real GDP growth in 2013 by about 1-1/2 percentage points relative to what it would have been otherwise.

Even better, have some specific conversion in mind, as what's the point of all this traffic if you have no real business - driving conversions?

But with the recent announcements of high priced options, the lack of real effort in delivering a great electric solution, and the desire to keep prices at the appropriate price point meant someone had to step up and deliver, this is what Atlis Motor Vehicles is about.

The point of this exercise is to take a real look at your retirement savings and your retirement plan, and figure out exactly what you need to be a happy retiree.

missing the point wrote: people are fighting if God is really or not but your missing the point it does not matter if God is real or not...... What someone believes does not matter is it what they do with that believe is what is really important ************** This brings me to one of my top reasons why I won't believe in What someone believes does not matter is it what they do with that believe is what is really important ************** This brings me to one of my top reasons why I won't believe in what they do with that believe is what is really important ************** This brings me to one of my top reasons why I won't believe in what is really important ************** This brings me to one of my top reasons why I won't believe in god.

I like real community — and this is kind of what it looks like — many of these points need to exist for people to «grow».

When Judas went back and try to give back the 30 silver coins he did so because he felt remorse, now there is a huge difference between remorse and repentance, which I don't have time to explain here, my point is let's not be ignorant of the Scriptures, we have to dig in real deep so that we can understand what it is trying to tell us.

I would like to point out to those here who think it is not possible for Jesuits (or anyone) to hold science and faith simultaneously, and who invoke «evidence» as the only arbiter of what is real, that human knowledge is always evolving.

This column brings up some good points, not the least of which is that people tend to discuss what is important and real to them when their time is limited.

My point was merely to show that both a God of Love or a God of Wrath can be perceived from the text, and ultimately it is up to the reader to decide if the perception of what they know the world to be like and what they assume God — if He is real — to be like.

And of course the whole point is not to share with others what isn't real or true for you, a point that is not lost on super pastor Rob as we return to the dilemma of living an honest faith when you become the latest pastor in demand.

What you say does nothing to invalidate my point, which is that when people believe in the supernatural they'll attribute phenomenon in the real world to with even though they have no rational reason to do so.

There can be a point of real conversation over these issues instead of what is always on these blogs.

You said «There can be a point of real conversation over these issues instead of what is always on these blogs.

Others, having seen a chink in the narcissist's armor, perhaps tried to say something because that's what good people do — you know, point something out nicely in hope of healing or reconciliation — only to find out that healthy, real relationship is not on the «do - do» list of a narcissist.

We must resist the temptation to bring it to the lowest possible point — fist fighting — and concern ourselves with hearing the voices of the marginalized, and finding real ways to address what they are saying.

Every adult knows the Tooth Fairy isn't real because at some point they learned what was causing the mystery.

I completely agree with what you are saying, but is this receipt supposed to be real or just to emphasize your point?

They hopefully move us toward real and genuine relationships with the important people around us and in our daily lives but to gain stratosperic or exopheric knowledge without those changes at the root and I often think «Whats the point?»

I already know that it is actually just your imagination and delusional world - view that makes you say these things, but I enjoy pointing out the holes in your words, showing you the lack of connection between what you say and the real world.

My real question from a purely «non-believer» point of view is «what kind of god would insist that silly rituals like these be observed»?

All of this is debt but at what point does this become a real problem and where do you start when you want to put it right?

When sinners try to construct out of these fragments a natural theology that points to the true God, they succeed only in assembling a picture of what Calvin called an idol, a deity who is not really God but only a cheap substitute for the real thing.

Our confusion then may be caused, as the good Bishop Berkeley put it regarding another matter, that we «raise a dust and then complain we can not see»; yet it is also due at points to a real lack of consistency in what the records tell us Jesus taught.

You say she has no proof that she has seen angels but do you have proof that she has not see angels and if you have proof that she has not I would love for you to point it out and we believe GOD is real for we walk by faith and not by sight but you say no one has proof that GOD existed but think about this what would lose believing in GOD if he doesn't exist?

So its ok for him to prove his points (which btw science can not prove something to be real when it comes to THEORIES which is what evolution is, which i believe to be true), yet when someone wants to believe in something that they see points to proof in thats not ok?

Of course, neither Chipotle nor Panera are known to offer Salsa Verde Beef Nachos or Mozzarella Sticks for $ 6.99 which seems like a real point in Applebee's favor, so who knows what's going on.

What I find so maddening in my efforts to negotiate the barriers between my Protestantism and my seminarians» Catholicism is that while we are united in so many of our convictions and practices, we are divided by differences real enough to make the Omega Point almost as remote as in the bad old days of open hostility between our churches.

But I think religion is multifactoral and complicated and I think what you point to is very real.

Tommy God has already forgiven you for your sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him as Lord.From that point he paid for your sin in full past present future.It is not sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory over.So where do you go from here as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.God does nt change his mind he always loves us but because of our choices we distance ourselves from God.The issue is that we like sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our nature only Christ can do that our old nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a made a real mess of things.I sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your sin to God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will make you a new man and sin will not have dominion over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to sin i know what it is like to have been set free by the power of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz

I'm not sure what my point is really, I'm kind of rambling, but I suppose it's just that I'm wondering that if it's possible for a bunch of online strangers to work out their disagreements and come to a friendly understanding (and yes endure temporary offenses and misunderstandings), it must be possible in real life church IF (a big «if») we are willing to stop being too afraid to speak up.

For as regards infra - human living things, even on the suppositions already mentioned, the question is probably still open, or has not yet been sufficiently subjected to examination, whether the living substantial formal principle of what in the metaphysical sense would be a real species (biological category, etc.), is multiplied with the individuals of the species (biological group, etc.), or is one and the same principle which, unfolding its formative power at various material points in space and time, manifests itself more than once in space and time.

When questioned, however, they can't move beyond these basic catch - phrases or talking points, and they have no real understanding of what they believe.

I'm not sure the film even needs such a premise to be effective, (in fact, it may distract from the main point a bit... and I hate to think there are people who need it to be reversed in order to empathize), for what really moved me was its depiction of bullying, which is based on real reports from LGBT kids.

Cecilia, I am talking about the real topic and that is what those symbols stand for whereas you seem to feel you are strengthening your points by pointing to other references.

The real questions facing us are, rather, these: At what point does a government become sufficiently corrupt that Christians must actively resist it?

From these view - points, a word can no longer be in the real sense an «event» for the hearer; for by means of correct analysis he can have in view beforehand all the possibilities of what may be said to him.

The real debate is not should abortion be allowed, it should only be at what point during pregnancy should we consider the embryo human and thus extending it human rights.