Sentences with phrase «what rights a child»

This article considers what rights a child may have to participate in court children proceedings, and how this can be done.

This article looks at what rights children may lose, and what rights may be lost to their parents, with UK's impending withdrawal from the EU.

Not exact matches

This is what it's like to have 12 weeks of leave after having a baby, if you're lucky enough to even have a job that offers it: You begin figuring out child care almost right away; the irony that you barely know how to take care of this little person and now must somehow assess someone else's ability to do so does not escape you.

As a parent, it can make sense to take out a Parent PLUS loan — you want to do what's best for your child and help pay for their education, right?

In what apparently is the latest incident in a campaign to push children toward becoming LGBT - rights activists, a teacher has instructed a middle - school student to sign up for «recurring text messages» associated with an LGBT «Day of Silence» campaign.

Conservatives are claiming this is what you get under socialized medicine: heartless government will override parental rights to pull the plug on your children.

Collectively, this disparity fuels what has been called the «school - to - prison - pipeline,» a systemic bias that civil rights advocates say pushes children and young adults of color out of the classroom and into the criminal justice system.

, you have no right what - so - ever to force your non-belief upon me and try to tell me I can't say «merry xmas», celebrate the birth and resurection and ensure that my child knows that evolution is NOT a fact but a theory yet to be proven, yet you and your liberal morons try to every day.

I love my children but I sure couldn't imagine torturing them for an eternity because I gave them free will to try to do what's right.

Think of the «rules» or what is right and wrong, like a parent who sets guidelines for their child to keep them safe, and when they step out of those guidelines a good parent disciplines the child.

No, I think he meant the belief that suffering is a «kiss from Jesus», that women can't make decisions about their own bodies, that the RCC's wealth, power and reputation are more important than doing what is right, and that children are there for the pleasure of the clergy.

when your mother / sister / cousin / daughter gets r / a / p / ed by some ass, remember you want her to give birth to that child because «GOD» made that baby and don't expect a dime from the governement to help with that «love child» seeing you want the governement to «stay out of your life»... but it's ok if they mess with everyone else based on your idea of «GOD» and what you think is right and just in fairy land.

And what is important to any of us but our family, or our children, or a wrong never righted?

Now, Job after his bought with «pride» he ask YHWH for his forgiveness, and was later blessed with more sons and daughters who did the law, who were good children and an even better wife, and he lived for four generations of his children and their children, and died a very happy and fulfilled life, knowing that all of his family was left with love, and peace and togetherness among each other, now this is true life, living righteously and wholesome by ourselves and by others around us is what we are all suppose to live like, caring for your neighbors faithfully, and all be as one now not after it is too late but now we need the law of righteousness from YHWH, the 10 commandments, the sabbath, a day of rest, and the passover to remember the ones who died innocently, and to remember the freedom of our lives given by YHWH and do good by one another and not let each other fall, right now is what we need in this world today people.

It is like a child playing in a mud puddle thinking that is what «real» fun is all about when right around the corner is an ocean side swimming pool.

Mr. Gourevitch is also right in believing that marching troops of schoolchildren through a horror show of what was done by awful people of what will seem to children a long way away and a long time ago is not necessarily a constructive purpose.

When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.

«They really are trying to give it their best shot, and part of what they're doing is trying not to take their children out of the world... so that they're children can be salt and light right across society.

Second, what about the presumption of innocence for accused priests, a right trumpeted in the Dallas Charter (Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People)?

Biblical principles require what the United Nations» Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) stipulates: «Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children» (Art. 26,3).

Moses also warned them first what would happen if they disobeyed it was there choice to repent or to act in there own strength.In regard to the last statement the Government justifys it by saying that it is the mother has the right to abort her children.

In one of his final speeches, King admonished: «If our nation can spend $ 35 billion dollars a year to fight an unjust, evil war in Vietnam, and $ 20 billion dollars to put a man on the moon, it can spend billions of dollars to put God's children on their own two feet right here...» MLK's talking points of tapping into America's financial resources in order to help the poverty - stricken across the land were directly at odds with the economic status quo, and that is part of what got him killed.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

The wife employed outside the home is more likely to apply what free time she has to the cause about which she cares the most, be it hunger, abortion, child abuse or women's rights.

= > that's a reasonable argument (I disagree with it), but as the amendment only has the affect of reducing the age at which the unborn childs rights are respected, the only point to debate is what age it should be.

Topher What a fvcking hypocrite when you have the gall to say you have the right to pedal your BS to other peoples children but dare say that only those YOU approve of should influence your children.

They could have had their children killed right before their eyes for what they did.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

For I have chosen him, so that he will direct his children and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord by doing what is right and just, so that the Lord will bring about for Abraham what he has promised him» (Genesis 18:17 - 19, NIV).

Now if you are a child, then go right now and show your parents what you wrote here.

now I liken this passage to what God said concerning the priest in the book of Numbers 18th chapter he said that their inheritance was of the tithes of the children of Israel and so too me its right on point as too those who are chosen by God whether Pastor, Evangelist or Apostle etc..

But there are two points I'd like to make here: firstly, we should never, ever reject our children for what we term «disobedience» — Discipline, yes, but rejection, no; secondly, what we deem to be right and wrong, particularly when dictated to by an outside agency like a church, or even our own interpretation of scripture, may not be what is right for them.

I care about the life people like you are attempting to force in to this world, you care about what appeases your god - big difference when you really don't care or consider the child only what your imaginary friend god wants and yet your god cause abortions all the time... you care about a clump of cells, not the actual life of the child and that's much worse than me supporting the rights of a woman to have control over her body, especially if the clump of cells couldn't survive outside of the host.

You're right, Your Answer, what should not matter is whether it was a «couple» having the children as much as the fact that they (gays and lesbians) chose to have them in the first place by whatever means.

Furthermore, we must guard against the notion that reproducing (or in this case replicating) children, no matter what the reason or cost, constitutes a civil right.

that's the work of the devil, right???... but answer this... what free will do children born with illnesses and disease have??..

this just shows that the world is getting weirder by the day... the pope is right, the world is experiencing amnesia nowadays... people especially in the west tends to have this amnesia coz they believe that they can live without God... they believe that they do nt need Him coz, they still able to survive... BUT what they do nt realize what these are all temporary... just look at the crisis going on right now... maybe God is still a mystery coz only FAITH can conquer mystery... can anybody out there lead me to any person who can create simply a tree, a true living tree... we know for sure that there are some who can create furnitures out from a tree... im really bothered that the world will end sooner than later... GOD FORBIDS... history just keeps on repeating itself... what a pity for the small children and the coming generation...

Teaching children to ignore whats right before their eyes and to believe is in something that simply has not foundation in facts is to do them a disservice.

NOTE: if what the bombers did was right, the child's death would not be suffering, but justice.

Since he can't seperate Obama's theology from his philosophy (and he home schools his children, obviously without a dictionary), what gives this idiot the right to dictate to people on how they will conduct their lives.

The parents» responsibility is always to evaluate the child's requests and then to respond in the light of what appears to be right.

There are whole chapters of John's Gospel that I would like to snip right out of the book so that no child ever has to read what John said Jesus said about Jews.

All people are God's Beloved children If they are gay They may not to be straightened Any more than my straight - ness Can by choice be «bent» What gives me the right To treat another's sexuality As if it is contagious?

i didn't like what they were saying and it made me feel like hitting them so i did, i was not in the right or the wrong just in the moment when the were running their mouth about all the women they raped and children they killed they deserved it in my opinion.

They also have the right to expect that the moral and social context within which the programme is taught is clearly Catholic, that children come away with a clear understanding of social relationships and the moral context in which sexual intimacy should occur, and an understanding of why the Catholic Church teaches what it teaches about the human body, sexuality, and friendship.

What parents are teaching their children is that «white is right».

The church has not just the right but the responsibility to alter texts to reflect its new vision of what has always been the church's hope: the inclusion of all God's children in the beloved community.

«Avenging Angels» — Brigham Youngs murderers — they did his bidding like the Mason Family Mountain Meadows Massacre — the massacre of 30 men 40 women and 70 children in Utah by the «Avenging Angels» see «Blood of the Prophets» by Will Bagley (mormon author) Blood Atonement — the practice of the mormons that atones for the death of its members and / or the act of which the mormons retaliate when they do not believe one is following what they think is right — google the 1984 murder the Lafferty brothers commited in Utah of their sister in - law and her 9 month old daughter by slitting their throats.

In a pluralist world, what may be called moral innocence tends to be lost, that is, the innocence we have as children growing up that our own religion and the views about right and wrong we were taught are the only ones, unchallengeable and unambiguous.

blah, blah, blah... waste your money on billboards, debate about what's real or myth, and who's right or wrong... i'm STILL a child of God... you can't shake my faith... all that matters to me is that I believe and trust in Him...