Sentences with phrase «what science studies»

Only then can one distinguish scientific inquiry from the deeper question of the nature of what science studies.

Not exact matches

She has spent years studying the science (research, studies, physiology, etc.) of how body language tells the story of what is going on inside someone's brain.

In many of the 374 brain science papers, the reviewers found the subjects knew what was being studied.

The study, just published in Science, showed that the creation of what the researchers are calling microtumors can help predict drug effectiveness in cancer patients better than the current standard method of testing the drugs on rodents.

Lyubomirsky recently spoke to the newsletter of Greater Good, a science center at UC Berkeley that studies well - being and positive psychology, laying out what the newsletter calls «the little details you should consider before undertaking happiness activities.»

I'm not alone in having a hard time hearing what my gut has to say when I'm already anxious, something a new study published in Clinical Psychological Science supports: researchers from the University of Basel and the Berlin Psychological University found that anxiety may impair your ability to listen to your intuition.

Now, a new study, published in Science Advances, has confirmed what NOAA first discovered in 2015 — the oceans are indeed warming, and faster than we thought.

Science has even shown that exercising around four hours after studying helps you remember more of what you're trying to learn.

A study published in the journal Science and written by three members of the Facebook data science team found that the News Feed algorithm suppresses what they called «diverse content» by 8 percent for self - identified liberals and 5 percent for self - identified conservScience and written by three members of the Facebook data science team found that the News Feed algorithm suppresses what they called «diverse content» by 8 percent for self - identified liberals and 5 percent for self - identified conservscience team found that the News Feed algorithm suppresses what they called «diverse content» by 8 percent for self - identified liberals and 5 percent for self - identified conservatives.

My understanding, as well as from what I've read about my church, is that God is the guiding force behind such phenomenons we learn about when we practice and study science to understand the natural world.

Science and industry have made phenomenal progress because they uniformly check and study the results of anything they do with the intention of changing production in the light of what has been learned.

It draws from social science studies and a raft of interviews to confirm what we already knew through experience.

What is your education level in studying science, mathematics, philosophy, and archaeology?

I agree — before I became a christian, I was studying science and let my thoughts follow what I thought was the truth (I now believe that God was guiding my thoughts)-- what a delight to find that truth is a person, Jesus!

Rufus, maybe if you actually studied Creationism or the theory of «Creation Science» you'd understand what it really is before you attack it.

Believe what you want, but let the kids study science, let them learn scientific methods and draw their own conclusions.

At the present time much of what is called liberal education in the arts and sciences is organized as a collection of specialized studies.

We can't all wade through modern science, philosophy, religions, arts, etc and do expert studies of them to know what is really true or not.

The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should raise questions about the meaning of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.

At least that's what a new study recently published in Science suggests.

Neo-orthodoxy, rejecting what it considered the facile optimism of 19th century liberalism, accepted the finds of modern science, but drew a distinction between the realms appropriate for scientific and theological study.

But as E. A. Burtt noted over half a century ago in his classic book The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science, the thinker who claims to eschew philosophy in favor of science is constantly tempted «to make a metaphysics out of his method,» trying to define reality as what his preferred techniques can measure rather than letting reality dictate what techniques are appropriate for studyScience, the thinker who claims to eschew philosophy in favor of science is constantly tempted «to make a metaphysics out of his method,» trying to define reality as what his preferred techniques can measure rather than letting reality dictate what techniques are appropriate for studyscience is constantly tempted «to make a metaphysics out of his method,» trying to define reality as what his preferred techniques can measure rather than letting reality dictate what techniques are appropriate for studying it.

Here we have the blind spot of creationism, for if we define science as the study of nature, then to offer an opinion concerning what lies outside of it is to step entirely outside of the scientific realm.

Stop the argument ladies and gentlemen, Science and God are inclusive, for the study of God is Theology, before you tell me Theology is not a Science, look up what scieScience and God are inclusive, for the study of God is Theology, before you tell me Theology is not a Science, look up what scieScience, look up what sciencescience is.

It is questions like these that have provoked the simple answer in much of the university today, not only in the United States but in Europe and Asia as well: Drop the idea of a core education altogether, especially when we know that what we really need to be studying is science, technology, and economics.

Science has provided numerous studies that state that what those sheep herding men wrote is wrong.

The Decision was not made by any scientific study it was a personal decision that took H0m0s off the DSM and in turn since you cant seem to follow this the DSM is what most physcs use so in turn they like you parrot a view point so they also chime in that is how science works.

What this means for the study of religion is that we can no longer legitimately isolate it as a peculiar expression of the human mind or focus on it as though psychology and the social sciences, or even theology, were the privileged roads to a contemporary understanding of it.

If you want to bring science into it there appears to be a neurological brain study about it: http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/97 Generally speaking, at this time I'm not sure how much stock I put into the results of these various neurological studies since while they seem to show brain activity under certain controlled situations, I don't necessarily find the situations conducive to what I consider proof.

What I have found is atheists like to know or study their way into things and for science that is a great way to do things.

Moreover, within the framework of these rubrics, it does not really make sense why Whitehead from 1912 on wrote and published — in addition to studies in natural philosophy and natural science — a series of what may be called contributions to popular philosophy, a genre which the secondary literature usually passes by In our reconstruction of the development of Whitehead's basic philosophical problem the significance of this phase of his activity becomes obvious.

An attempt to show how we can envisage the study of religious symbolism in the perspective of the science of religions, and what the results of this procedure can be.

Even if what you say is true, and the jury is still out on all the science part (I have yet to see a real study) Should the gay lifestyle be promoted and publicly endorsed is equivalent in social good?

Science is the empirical study of the world around us, and it provides us with information we can use to make decisions; but it can not tell us what should be, only what is.

We want to show how we can envisage the study of religious symbolism in the perspective of the science of religions, and what the results of this procedure can be.

I love that study, it shows how the manuscripts of the OT were put together into what we now have as the OT by the scribe Ezra, and also shows the science of manuscripts, and how the NT that we now have was circulated whole as early as 100AD, and that no council ever voted on what was to be «in» the Bible, because the books of the Bible were dictated by the apostles themselves.

I was raised catholic, studied Christianity in private bible study, became atheist when I learned the sciences and yet today I am a very spiritual person, based on what I have learned from the scriptures of multiple religions and the science that explains a lot of the universal way of life.

Informed by cutting - edge science and nutrition, along with case studies from men and women who have experienced life - changing transformations in their health after waving goodbye to wheat, Wheat Belly is an illuminating look at what is truly making Americans sick and an action plan to clear our plates of this seemingly benign ingredient.

A body that calls itself the CIES Football Observatory (part of the International Centre for Sports Studies) have come up with what they say is a science based algorithm -LRB-!)

Despite finding that underreporting continues to be what she wrote in two 2013 studies to be an «alarming» [17] and «overwhelming» problem, [16] Johna Register - Mihalik, Ph.D, LAT, ATC, Senior Research Associate at WakeMed and Adjunct Assistant Professor at UNC - Chapel Hill, told MomsTEAM that the the reason the use of impact sensors was not among the recommendations she and her co-authors in those studies made to address the problem of chronic underreporting was that she viewed «the use of impact sensors in concussion detection, as the science, although a growing field of information, is just not quite there in how these may best be used from a clinical standpoint and across all sport settings.»

Not only was that assertion completely at odds with the uncertain state of the existing science, but it was contradicted by the study itself, in which Dr. McKee and her colleagues acknowledged that several other factors, besides prior participation in football, may influence CTE risk and disease severity, including factors other than cumulative hits to the head, and admitted that it was even «unclear» what roles concussions and repetitive subconcussive hits play in CTE risk, disease severity, and progression.

Despite finding that underreporting continues to be what she wrote in two 2013 studies to be an «alarming» and «overwhelming» problem, Dr. Johna Register - Mihalik, a research scientist and member of the faculty at the Matthew Gfeller Sport - Related TBI Research Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, recently told MomsTEAM that the reason she and her colleagues did not recommend the use of impact sensors in addressing the problem was that she viewed «the use of impact sensors in concussion detection, as the science, although a growing field of information, [as] just not quite there in [terms of] how the [y] may best be used from a clinical standpoint and across all sport settings.»

But on visiting each of the three classrooms, I brightened — seeing the joy and hope on the girls» faces as they talked about what they loved studying (e.g., Amharic, English, science, math), what they hoped to be (e.g., pilot, doctor, engineer, driver, teacher, community mentor for BiruhTesfa), and what the best / worst parts of their days are (unanimously, best = being at school, worst = work hours).

The study's co-author Rebecca Treiman, a professor of psychological and brain sciences, explained that the study showed that children actually display knowledge about the formulas of written language, such as which letters are usually grouped together before they learn what those letters actually represent.

I think most of my readers are actually really interested in the studies — that's why they're here and why I focus on what the science tells us.

It also ignited her deep passion for studying the science of birth and what makes it safe and joyous.

For those of you who are interested in finding out what the current science is on the relative safety of hospital versus nonhospital birth in the United States, here are some of the latest relevant studies:

WebMD and the Scripps Translational Science Institute (STSI) are partnering to study what contributes to healthy pregnancies.

Fifth, the right wing websites, who would never be caught dead reading a hostile left wing website and who would never read anything written by actual scientists (who they consider to either be part of the liberal elite or part of an ill - defined conspiracy), never hear about what poor science the study they're celebrating actually is, and go right on believing that their anti-global warming position is so obviously correct that everyone else must either be fools or conspirators.I believe the link pfft posted is step three.

Guests will be welcomed by Kelvin Hopkins MP - chair of the All Party Group for Social Science and Policy - with other panel members including Paul Johnson - Director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies - and Professor Gloria Laycock from the What Works Centre for Crime Reduction.