Sentences with phrase «what scientific purpose»

Aside from virtual tours of our universe, what scientific purpose does a map like this have?

Not exact matches

The prime proponents of ID are the fine folk at the Discovery Inst / itute who openly admit that they purpose is NOT to teach what they think is true, but rather to use ID as a «wedge to defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral, cultural and political legacies» and to separate science from it's allegiance to «atheistic naturalism».

What religion offers: — The opportunity to avoid eternal punishment for not worshiping / believing in my god (not worried enough to care)-- An explanation for the universe and why we are here (I'll take the knowledge gained from the application of the scientific method, but thanks)-- Living forever in heavenly bliss (I am content with this life)-- The opportunity to divide humanity based upon different belief systems (There is enough dividing us already)-- Purpose, a code of ethics, and fulfillment (I have that already, without religion)-- Develop a personal relationship with god (I've never seen or heard from any gods nor have I seen any independantly verified scientifically collected peer reviewed proof.

The understanding is clear for those who believe and when God says I will wipe away every tear and create a new heaven and earth we will see that the missing limb had a purpose greater than what is observable in the physical or measurable by earthly standards (scientific method).

Although it is not the Bible's purpose to give a careful scientific definition of what our «needs» are, Scripture does repeatedly identify justice with assistance for the poor, the sick, and the powerless.

They were composed not by historians, with what we like to call scientific detachment, but by Christian preachers and teachers, and for certain practical purposes.

In today's One Verse Podcast, you will see why we can not read Genesis 1:14 - 19 as a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came to be, and you will also learn from the text what three purposes these celestial lights serve in God's creation.

In this episode of the One Verse Podcast, you will see why we can not read Genesis 1:14 - 19 as a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came to be, and you will also learn from the text what three purposes these celestial lights serve in God's creation.

In this episode of the One Verse Podcast, you will see why we can not read Genesis 1:14 - 19 as a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came to be, and you will also learn from the text what three purposes these celestial lights serve in.

But briefly, it is this: «orthodox» scientific uneasiness about the role of purpose or final causation in planetary evolution has its grounds partly in the fact that over the centuries most people who have tried to describe the role of purpose on Earth haven't known «what» they were talking about.

At this point, Whitehead's analysis is particularly helpful, for he helps us understand where the purposes of the world are, in what kinds of things, and how they are related to the intricate patterns of physical causation we may discover through scientific research.

What's the purpose of a scientific career?

You've got this article in the November — that's the issue — Scientific American, «A Need for New Warheads, «and right on page two of the article, you actually list my first three questions, and they are: What is the purpose of the U.S. nuclear arsenal?

What I did not know until later was that most of these men not only knew one another, but they belonged to a society they themselves had founded in England — not a secret society or a fraternal order, but a society whose sole purpose was to further and quicken the application or use of scientific discoveries.

So for scientific / academic purposes, I take no issue with what the requirements are for a «null hypothesis.»

SBSTA (Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technical Advice) has two main objectives for the parties to declare — what is the purpose of the FVA and what is the scope?

Generally, for climate purpose, the Earth's temperature is regarded as the average temperature of the air at any given moment and much scientific effort has been put into ascertaining what it is and how the real world arrives at that temperature for the air.

Newman professes to believe that the scientific establishment is engaged in «mass psychology» because it is «intent on exploiting the masses and extracting more money» (to what purpose he did not say).

That's not in general objectionable for scientific purposes, but records calibrated into agreement can not be used to support any claim that what is being recorded is a uniform global phenomenon.

So it goes against your scientific scruples to simply lift the IPCC's time - series projections for the purpose of plotting what the IPCC says are its... um... time - series projections?

However, it's the minority composed of global heating deniers who continue to hunt for flaws in climate science, so the deniers serve a valuable scientific purpose — when they find a real hole, or just think they have, addressing their claims are what has made the science of global heating as bullet - proof as it now is.

I have great faith in a higher purpose behind what reveals itself in the physical universe and I see no reason for any of it to conflict with my belief in evolution or any other well - vetted «scientific» theories.