Sentences with phrase «what sexual orientation»

It doesn't matter what your sexual orientation is.

It does not matter what sexual orientation you have.

Gay people find it very hard to meet up with each other as many people keep it a secret about what their sexual orientation is, this is to save themselves from harassment or prejudice.

«To have the kind of sex that makes people closer as a couple no matter what your sexual orientation, start thinking about sex way more broadly that we normally do in our culture.

Not exact matches

«We appreciate what each individual brings to the team, including background, education, gender, race, ethnicity, working and thinking styles, sexual orientation, gender identity, veteran status, religious background, age, generation, disability, cultural expertise and technical skill.

It's easy to discriminate against the minority cobbler down the street by traveling a few extra blocks to buy from «your own kind»; it's much harder to act out your racist biases when buying shoes at a big department store because, well, you have no idea what colour or sex or sexual orientation of the person who made those shoes is.

What attracted me to the book was an interview I read with Vance in which he described how liberal whites went so far to ensure they never offended any people of color or people with different sexual orientations but were quick to pass judgment on people from flyover states.

What I mean is, we are the generation that have helped make massive strides in social rights, self - reflection, a broader understanding for people of all backgrounds, ethnicities, sexual orientations, and more.

In Cook's statement of his own sexual orientation in Bloomberg Businessweek he justified revealing that he was gay for social reasons, noting what he sees as the potential for anti-gay discrimination in the majority of the country.

Canadian Press reported that Harper said: «Regarding sexual orientation or, more accurately, what we are really talking about, sexual behaviour, the argument has been made.

Canadian Press reported that Harper said: «Regarding sexual orientation or, more accurately, what we are really talking about, sexual behaviour, the argument has been made... that this is analogous to race and ethnicity.

what i mean by «practicing», and i admit it is an insufficient word, is someone who lives according to their sexual orientation.

Now if the Bible could be so wrong about a clear ethical failure of slavery, what makes anyone think it has anything to say about sexual orientation or women's rights?

(For examples of this approach, see What Does «Sexual Orientation» Orient?

When the basis for this is our sexual orientation, rather than what we do about it, it is homophobia.

(Though many believe His reference to some eunuchs being born this way was an acknowledgement of such a condition without condemnation) And the 6 or 7 typical clobber passages in the bible, upon careful examination, fail to address what we presently understand as sexual orientation at all.

What we see in the cartoon id the interesting thoughts of is our sexual orientation someting we are born with or somethig that by nurture and social conditioning is what we adWhat we see in the cartoon id the interesting thoughts of is our sexual orientation someting we are born with or somethig that by nurture and social conditioning is what we adwhat we adopt.

A youth who is not sure of his or her identity, perhaps his or her sexual orientation or what his or her main commitments are to be, may find life anything but fulfilling.

Members of the dominant sexual orientation reason that what is normal for them is also natural.

I can't imagine what it would be like to believe that something like my sexual orientation - something so intrinsic, so central to my being - was somehow corrupted and yet utterly beyond my ability to change.

What is wrong, what is unnatural, what is immoral and what is gross is intolerance and discrimination against fellow human beings for their sexual orientation and active pursuit of preventing loving and committed homosexual couples from legally being marrWhat is wrong, what is unnatural, what is immoral and what is gross is intolerance and discrimination against fellow human beings for their sexual orientation and active pursuit of preventing loving and committed homosexual couples from legally being marrwhat is unnatural, what is immoral and what is gross is intolerance and discrimination against fellow human beings for their sexual orientation and active pursuit of preventing loving and committed homosexual couples from legally being marrwhat is immoral and what is gross is intolerance and discrimination against fellow human beings for their sexual orientation and active pursuit of preventing loving and committed homosexual couples from legally being marrwhat is gross is intolerance and discrimination against fellow human beings for their sexual orientation and active pursuit of preventing loving and committed homosexual couples from legally being married.

It is simply the case that sexual relations are «natural» to «embodied» life, and so may be (and indeed usually are) necessary for the wholeness and fulfillment of individuals no matter what their marital status, sexual orientation, or gender identification may be.

What could it mean for the struggle over sexual orientation and ordination that is going on in all of our denominations if we began, not from some culturally inherited moral code, but from the thought - filled recognition of our discipleship of the compassionate Christ?

What form does pastoral care take in a parish bleeding from internal conflicts about life and ministry in a neighborhood undergoing rapid changes in matters of race, age, economic class and sexual orientation?

If one were to assess sexual orientation by behavior rather than biology, one would be more inclined to Freud's view that our sexuality is polymorphous: heterosexual and homosexual and what all, through a fascinating range of fact and fantasy.

While I do not want to prejudge you with your recent «revelations» as to what you believe describes the «two men in a bed» or «two women at the mill grinding,» I think before anyone interprets this as Jesus not judging one because of their sexual orientation, but obviously of their faith in what Jesus did for them on the Cross, we also need to look at what the Apostle Paul wrote under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

The ancient writers... were operating without the vaguest idea of what we have learned to call «sexual orientation.

Given the present state of our knowledge about the etiology of homosexual orientation, it is more honest to say that we simply do not know with certainty and specificity what factors are involved in the genesis of one's sexual identity and corresponding sexual orientation.

«What is clear, however,» says the San Francisco statement, «is that the homosexual orientation is not simply a matter of... truncated sexual development.»

For example, I don't know what sort of evidence or criticism could be brought to bear on Mr. Farrow's claim that only sexual difference, and not sexual orientation, is fundamental to human well - being.

Almost three - quarters of those suicides are suicides by Christian young people who can not reconcile their sexual orientation with what they're hearing from the pulpit.

Everyone no matter who or what they are, what color of skin, sexual orientation, what career or job they have every one of us deserves respect period.

Equal rights for all, without regard to skin color, ethnic heritage, economic status, religion (or lack thereof), sexual orientation, marital status, whether or not you have children, what school you went to or what your politics are.

We believe that what God cares about is not our sexual orientation but our theological orientation - and that the question that matters is not «who do you love?»

The question is, once this sexual - orientation structure collapses, what will come to replace it: the queer theorists» nihilistic anything - goes ethic, or the classical Christian view from which all of this is a departure, the view that takes the marital - procreative as its end and organizing principle, evaluating passions against nature rather than vice versa?

If there is an agenda (there isn't), the focus is more on making people understand that it DOES N'T MATTER whether or not you can «spot» sexual orientation, or even that there is a difference in orientation... what matters is that we are all human and we all have the same basic rights.

Did we collectively have a meaningful discussion, decide on what should change, and then develop a plan for improving lives and repairing relationships between people with different values, colors of skin, sexual orientations?

The authors of Human Sexuality are right to criticize much of past thinking on sexuality for its «act orientation,» but we have no idea what or how sexual activity should be embodied in our character until we know how marriage should be shaped and sustained.

What if she declined to fill out the sexual orientation question?

What is obvious, but rather confusing, is the way LGBTQI mainly describes sexual preferences or orientations rather than the familiar male and female categories of biology.

We have seen in particular how these laws are used by the government in an attempt to compel citizens to sacrifice their deepest convictions on marriage and what it means to be male and female, people who serve everyone, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, but who can not promote messages, engage in expression, or participate in events that contradict their beliefs or their organization's guiding values.

Indeed, what is authoritative is no longer an individual's sexual identity but his sexual orientation; if an individual who is physically masculine can in fact be psychologically feminine or the reverse, and if it is the will of the individual and no longer nature that determines sex, then why not institutionalize the union of two people, whoever they might be?

And what about sexual orientation, Chad?

What is authoritative is no longer an individual's sexual identity but his sexual orientation.

I'm concerned about my family, and a big part of what I worry about is my daughter growing up in a world where people are denied the same legal rights and access to marriage because of their gender identity or sexual orientation.

Considering that Roy Moore, who's leading the polls for the election in Alabama, has been accused of being a sexual predator targeting underage women, and considering that the elected president of the USA, Donald Trump, is himself someone who has admitted to groping and spying on naked, underage models, and even said that he would like to have sex with his own daughter, my question is, to what extent is pedophilia an accepted sexual orientation in the United States?

But she couldn't escape what she didn't mention in her speech, her sexual orientation.

I have to assume that my experience of not being able to change my sexual orientation is similar to what I hear from gay people.

And what does a person sexual orientation have ANYTHING to do with running a city?

Ever since the Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act was approved by the Legislature in late 2002, transgender rights advocates have pressed Albany to redress what was left out that year — anti-bias protections in state human rights law based on gender identity and expression.