Tangible book value is
what shareholders of the company can expect to receive if the company were to go bankrupt and takes out items such as goodwill that no one buys when assets are liquidated.
Not exact matches
Although on balance these total amounts may be financially immaterial to
shareholders, they may represent only a small part
of what a
company spends to influence political outcomes in the United States or here in Canada.
First, public
companies have an «agency problem,» the inherent conflict
of interest between executives wanting to create wealth for themselves and doing
what's best for
shareholders.
He was repeatedly grilled by a
shareholder about
what he saw is a misalignment
of interests with the board and management who owned few shares in the
company.
In response to a
shareholder question about
what could be done to speed up the glacial pace
of adoption
of electric car production by other car
companies, Musk said he was «playing with doing something fairly significant on this front which would be kind
of controversial with respect to Tesla's patents.»
Here's
what the structure looks like: T - Mobile parent
company Deutsche Telekom will own 42 %
of the combined carrier, Sprint parent
company SoftBank will own 27 %, and public
shareholders get the remaining 31 %.
In
what is perhaps the
company's most valuable public vote
of confidence, Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett called AmEx an «excellent business» with managers that are «talented and
shareholder - oriented» in his 2016 annual report to
shareholders.
LONDON / NEW YORK / TOKYO, April 25 - Rare disease specialist Shire said on Wednesday it was willing to recommend a sweetened $ 64 billion offer from Japan's Takeda Pharmaceutical Co to
shareholders, in
what would be the biggest acquisition
of a drug
company since 2000..
Employee stock options align the interests
of key players in a
company with
what's needed to add
shareholder value, and that's beneficial.
Kullman didn't comment on the DuPont - Dow merger specifically, but she said that deals in which
companies are put together only to be broken up — which is
what is happening in the DuPont - Dow transaction — are the product
of short - term thinking, and not
what's best for long - term
shareholders or the
company.
«I'm proud
of what I created at American Apparel and am confident that, as its largest
shareholder, I will have a strong relationship with the
company in the years ahead,» he said in a statement.
Those have long been fun theoretical questions; for myself, I'm a big fan
of the notion that
companies should be able to choose exactly
what rights go in the bundle that
shareholders get, and
what level
of care and catering they promise to
shareholders.
LONDON / NEW YORK / TOKYO Rare disease specialist Shire said on Wednesday it was willing to recommend a sweetened $ 64 billion offer from Japan's Takeda Pharmaceutical Co to
shareholders, in
what would be the biggest acquisition
of a drug
company since 2000.
3 But if you subscribe to the simple activist -
shareholder model, in which activists (1) identify underperforming
companies, (2) buy up those
companies» (cheap) stock, (3) push the
companies to improve, and then (4) reap (a portion
of) the rewards
of that improvement,
what do you think about this development?
And so, I think there is very little risk in that regard but I mean, if there was something fully unanticipated that would happen, I would say that as a
company, we would be fully prepared to do
what was ever necessary and in the best interest
of our
company and our
shareholders.
The basic responsibility
of directors is to exercise their business judgment to act in
what they reasonably believe to be the best interests
of the
Company and its
shareholders.
For auditors
of public interest entities, such as banks, insurance
companies and listed
companies, the committee agreed that audit firms would have to provide
shareholders and investors with a detailed understanding
of what the auditor did and an overall assurance
of the accuracy
of the
company's accounts.
«As long as you're doing something that doesn't harm the value
of the
company, accelerating the benefits to
shareholders is exactly
what creating value is about.
Its often seemed odd to me how Buffett lef these partners
of his come along for a free ride... by running a
company not fund... guess that's capitalism, that's
shareholders... they were entitled to the slice they left with him from his partnership / hedgie days if my memory serves, but you have to say —
what a deal!
And with a payout ratio
of 47.8 %, you're looking at
what's basically a «perfect balance» between retaining earnings for
company growth and returning cash to
shareholders.
Asked
what he would do if he was approached by a buyer for MDC, he said, «As the CEO
of MDC, I work for the
shareholders, and ultimately the
shareholders and the board will determine if a bid is made for the
company and fair value is being paid.
It is possible that the announcement
of the partnership with Panasonic, along with the rumored unveiling
of the solar roof on Oct. 28, will look to showcase
what the merged
company is capable
of in advance
of the upcoming
shareholder vote to approve the proposed transaction.
After the close
of the deal, Yahoo
shareholders will still own shares in
what is left
of the
company, essentially an investment fund with two holdings: a 15 percent stake, worth about $ 32 billion based on its recent share price, in the Chinese internet
company Alibaba; and a 35.5 percent stake, worth about $ 8.7 billion, in Yahoo Japan.
Further, in an effort to encourage transparency and responsiveness to AGM voting,
companies will need to explain
what action has been taken to consult with
shareholders when more than 20 %
of votes have been cast against the board's recommendation.
If a
company has proven that it can average a high return on total capital within the majority
of its business operations (averaging, say, 15 % + per year for many years) then the
company can reinvest
what would be dividends, and thus save the
shareholder tax.
«In terms
of what companies are doing wrong: First, underestimating the knowledge and sophistication
of institutional investors... Second, misinterpreting the
shareholder engagement process... Third, paying big bonuses on operating metrics when
shareholders have lost money.
As Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) prepares itself for its annual
shareholders» meeting on Wednesday, the main topic
of discussion among analysts and investors is whether the
company will go for a stock split or not and if yes,
what will be the ratio?
In the letter, the
company said that «succumbing to political pressure to do
what is expedient» would fly «in the face
of our fiduciary responsibility as stewards
of the
company for the benefit
of shareholders.»
LONDON / NEW YORK / TOKYO (Reuters)- Rare disease specialist Shire said on Wednesday it was willing to recommend a sweetened $ 64 billion offer from Japan's Takeda Pharmaceutical Co to
shareholders, in
what would be the biggest acquisition
of a drug
company since 2000.
In a Glass Lewis Proxy Talk held April 17, 2014, Anne Simpson
of CalPERS and Michael Garland
of the New York City Comptroller's Office discussed why they think
shareholders should vote against the re-election
of four Duke Energy Corporation directors for
what they believe to be a failure
of the directors to fulfill their obligations
of risk oversight as members
of a committee overseeing health, safety, and environmental compliance at the
company.
The showdown also marks the first time in recent memory
shareholders of a major oil and gas
company have been given a choice
of directors between
what the
company wants and
what the dissident group wants (it is pushing for four
of its nominees to be voted to the board).
In its view, the
company's repeated strategy shifts, missed expectations and
what it characterizes as «undue optimism» have resulted in an erosion
of management credibility, and by extension,
shareholder value at the storied Wall Street firm.
But depriving three big brokerage firms
of allocations seems to be a little at odds with
what the Treasury Department, the
company's biggest
shareholder, had hoped to achieve.
This came after an exhaustive due diligence process where Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and junior partner Rhone Capital, and rival bidder TPG Capital, investigated the inner workings
of the
company but couldn't pay
what the
company's major institutional
shareholders wanted.
(And then think
of the
companies who own abattoirs, and
companies like Kraft or Coles or Woolworths and
what their
shareholders and executives earn...)
If you need to take over a
company in order to remove bad management,
what does that imply about the effectiveness
of corporate oversight and governance by
shareholders?
The board
of directors
of Las Vegas - based Wynn Resorts is facing mounting lawsuits from
shareholders — including the NYS pension fund — who allege they breached their fiduciary duties when they ignored
what has been described as a longstanding pattern
of sexual abuse and harassment by the
company's founder, Steve Wynn.
And
what the discussion paper is that we're talking about is looking at the various options by which the owners
of companies — the
shareholders — can exercise more effective control.
It's written in a language pretty close to English, with very little finance - speak, and is meant to be something close to
what the president
of the
company would say as an introductory speech at the
company's annual
shareholders meeting.
For Poirier, the key message was that R&D groups have a mandate
of innovation and discovery, whereas the marketing division's mandate is to do
what is necessary to sell the drug and provide profits for the
company shareholders.
Or, in another, less accurate but more interesting way
of thinking about it, it is
what the brand is worth to its
shareholders — the
shareholders, in this case, being not necessarily the owners
of the
company, but the consumers who use the brand.
There's the explosion
of for - profit charter school
companies that run
what are supposed to be public schools that serve students and communities not out
of state corporations and their
shareholders.
This is just another example
of what happens when
companies loose site
of what's really important and just worry about the bottom line and the almighty
shareholders.
The dividend payout ratio is a simple financial calculation that looks at
what percentage
of a
company's net income is used to pay its dividends to
shareholders.
Assuming the
company decides not to pay a dividend to the
shareholders (so the
shareholders can reinvest the money themselves), financial managers within Pfizer must identify new projects that offer a higher rate
of return than
what they could get if they simply invested the money in the financial market (this being the opportunity cost
of capital).
To reiterate
what we said in our January 6, 2009 letter and have repeated numerous times during our discussions with management, we believe that any action other than the immediate dissolution and liquidation
of the
Company is an irresponsible waste
of corporate assets and will result in a severe impairment
of shareholder value.
Furthermore, if upon further analysis one could find that this
company in fact generates an extraordinary amount
of cash flow that inflows through the business, one could attempt a proxy fight and offer all the current
shareholders a premium to
what the
company is proposing.
Networth is the portion
of a
company's assets that the
shareholders own, as opposed to
what they've borrowed.
Even if one
company happens to reduce or eliminate their payout to
shareholders, a properly diversified investor should still receive more annual income as the increases from the rest
of the portfolio offset
what is lost.
And with a payout ratio
of 47.8 %, you're looking at
what's basically a «perfect balance» between retaining earnings for
company growth and returning cash to
shareholders.