Sentences with phrase «what side of the argument»

of course no team wants to lose but I can guarantee you that the reaction by the Chelski fans after today's results are nowhere near what would have occurred if we shit the bed on opening day... the difference is they have tasted EPL success on more than one occasion recently, they have won the Champions League and they have done it with 3 different managers in the last 12 years with a similar, if not smaller, wage bill than us... in comparison, we have been experiencing our own personal Groundhog Day with nothing to show for it but a few silvery trinkets that would barely wet the appetite of a world - class club... so it's time for Wenger to stop gloating over our week one escape act and make some substantial moves before this window closes or I fear that things will take a horrible turn when the inevitable happens... living on a knife's edge is no way to go through a full season of football and regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, you could feel high levels of toxicity in the air and that was friggin week one... I would much rather someone tried their best and failed, than took half - measures and hoped for the best

Regardless of what side of the argument you are on, there is some very interesting questions to ask regarding this topic and there is still much to learn in the future.

Your enjoyment of it may depend on what side of the argument you come down on, although climate change deniers are hardly likely to be watching this in the first place.

Multiple narrative voices bring these characters to life, allowing players to switch perspectives, and even make different choices based on what side of the arguments they fall on.

No matter what side of the argument you fall on, one thing about Final Fantasy XIII is clear.

It doesn't matter what side of the argument they are on.

Which of course is true by definition for most people regardless of what side of any argument that they agree with.

[Jascha] Heifetz: «No matter what side of the argument you are on, you always find people on your side that you wish were on the other.»

No matter what side of the argument you support, and no matter the result fo the hard fork, Know that your Bitcoins will be okay, and Having multiple implementations and sidechains is great for the health and competitiveness of Bitcoin in the long term.

Regardless of what side of the arguments you are on in the conflicts that there are in the world, the people in our armed forces truly believe in protecting us from any harm these troubles may cause and they deserve our sincere thanks for setting out to do that.

Not exact matches

It means deciding what one believes not by conforming to fashionable opinions, but by taking the trouble to learn and honestly consider the strongest arguments to be advanced on both or all sides of questions — including arguments for positions that others revile and want to stigmatize and against positions others seek to immunize from critical scrutiny.»

What follows are some of the highlights of his arguments on both sides of the question.

What I like about Fox is their insistence on BOTH sides of any argument appear together to voice the argument of either side.

I said what I said for anyone willing to listen to both sides of the fence and weigh the arguments without preconceived bias.

This paper will examine the arguments on each side, indicate what the societal view implies about the nature of...

By refusing to choose sides in arguments, but instead taking the side of love and caring and dignity, which is exactly what Jesus did.

This paper will examine the arguments on each side, indicate what the societal view implies about the nature of God, and suggest an additional argument for the societal view based on the idea of God's freedom and faithfulness which this view implies.

The proper argument is not an abstract debate over the size of government but a debate over how much government we want and need, whose side government is on and what interests government serves.

But what I detect in it is the work of someone who was never all that interested in investigating the arguments on either side of the same - sex marriage debate; whose scant interest in it has now been fully exhausted, both intellectually and morally; and whose present conclusions hover in mid-air without anything to support them other than a wistful regret that he has lost a hoedown partner in a gay man who has come fairly unglued over the issue.

Your point is well taken but what of the other side of the argument.

And I tossed those options in because I think that's what the holdup is from the Boras side of the argument.

So I guess I can understand both sides of this argument but what I hope for as a fan is that an agreement can be made and we can see just how far Nelson can go at Arsenal.

I understand that you're doing what you can to win people to your side of the argument.

«It is the case in Oxford and Cambridge Union debating contests that the competitors are given one side of the argument to debate blind, and so may have to argue a case they oppose, as I remember from my own first year efforts at Oxford» What a curious remark to make!

We just have to think our way through whether it would be safe to decriminalise hard drugs — I'm not on either side of the argument, it's just about what's practical.»

«They present one side of an argument and what they have written is factually correct, there are no lies in it, but it is clearly misleading.»

This is a bit rich from an organisation whose news values seem to think that Labour's false claims, systematic lies about Labour's opponents and a one sided presentation of the public spending argument is what constitute journalism here in the UK.

MEPs» views about the chances of Britain leaving the EU, and what it could mean for both sides of the argument.

The arguments being presented on both sides too often focus on which side is right, and not enough on what all of this means for the children.

This writer didn't label it or condemn it — what he did was put forth two sides of the argument and left it open,» says Tadros, who also studies suicide in modern cultures.

I like to listen to both sides of an argument, look at the facts (not theories) from both sides and especially look at our evolutionary history to see what kinds of foods people all over the world have eaten for thousands, and hundreds of thousands, of years that sustain optimal health.

Before starting to write this review, I decided to read the pro-Shyamalan arguments in the attempt to get the flip side opinion as to what I consider to be one of the worst films of 2008, and perhaps the worst film from an auteur of Shyamalan's reputation in some time.

What I thought the movie did exceptionally well show both sides of the argument.

Referring to the FMCSA enforcement decisions as reported on the Department's Docket Management System, he noted that «the tenor of the pleadings on both sides often appears to be bitter, going well beyond the mere assertion of different, conflicting arguments about what the law requires and what penalty, if any, should be imposed.»

What everyone on both sides of the argument needs to realize is that the djin is out of the bottle.

The Guardian explained how «Tor rips up the rulebook on digital rights management» and the BBC featured a long article with arguments from both sides, drawing links with the music industry's experience of the transition and highlighting that «the key difference with the music business is that the book trade can see what mistakes the record labels made and avoid them.»

I guess I am a glutton for punishment, but I am going to take the opposite side of the argument from what most have been saying of late regarding the rating agencies.

As the Devil's Advocate, my role is to take the opposite side of an argument, regardless of what I personally think.

As someone who's been travelling solo since I was 17, you could probably guess what side of the field I'm on in this argument.

So what I tend to do when I get like that more often than not, is understand both sides of argument and relate to them so I come off sincere about what I'm talking about but state where I stand and my reasoning.

Even though it's easier to walk away, the worth is in winning the fight; you do want to see what's in store on the other side of the argument.

Yet their show also vigorously reminds us of what a smart young artist once told me: Pluralism doesn't equal peaceful coexistence; it just means more sides to the argument.

I think, had Exxon continued in that role, there might not be such a cacophony of anti-climate arguments that are ongoing now because there would have been somebody at the table who came from the side of fossil fuel use and would have been shown to be a leader in terms of the science and this was their reasoned opinion as to what was going on.

So essentially, I put the arguments of both sides «to the test», and arrived at the conclusion the theory is real, that the models have validity, that there is a need to consider what they mean, and what the tradeoffs are for different policy choices for mitigating it.

That's an argument than even deeply non-technical non-scientists of the general public (and Congress / Senate) can understand - part of their «figuring out who knows what about science» mental toolkit that Dan so admires - which is probably why climate science communicators on the sceptic side are so keen to communicate it.

But what it did reveal was the uglier side of the argument in favour of action to mitigate climate change.

On occasion I get a boot on the derriere that forces me to try to better understand the arguments on both sides of the issue and learn more about what scientists are trying to tell us.

As at various points in my life I've been a «born again Baptist», a strong Atheist, and a simpering Agnostic; I'm comfortable with all sides of the argument... So I'm more «like the French»... I don't care what you believe as long as you say it properly; --RRB-

And yes, I am generally inclined to let the public decide what is worthwhile and will always err on the side of getting the arguments out there for consideration.

What the contrarians need is not to win rationally the argument for / against man - made global warming (this has been resolved scientifically) but plant doubt in the public and politicians, because inaction and the status quo is on the side of the traditional energy industry.