Sentences with phrase «what sides you want»

«What both sides want is certainty,» Feinberg says.

To be fair, each side wants what each side wants, and in this great country of ours, everyone is allowed to speak his or her mind.

Back in 2007, a Kentucky Fried Chicken counter person decided exactly how long you can stand at the counter without making a decision about what sides you want, according to the Philadelphia Daily News.

Vancouver Surrey Marriage Agreement Lawyers know fair agreements will be upheld and the procedure and substantive terms of the negotiation and creation of the agreement are crucial to ensure it operates fairly and accomplishes what both sides wanted.

Not exact matches

Even if it starts as a side hustle, identify what you want to succeed at and get going, LaCola says: «Remember, Wu Tang started selling their album out of the trunk of a car on Staten Island.»

Regardless of what has happened before, I assume I know nothing about what the other side wants.

These two Googlers wanted to show the world what it's like working for the technology giant, so they took advantage of Google's 20 percent time policy (ergo the name), which allows employees to work on side projects up to one day a week.

The wealthiest and most successful people know that the keys to any negotiation are threefold: First, understand what the other side really wants.

It means deciding what one believes not by conforming to fashionable opinions, but by taking the trouble to learn and honestly consider the strongest arguments to be advanced on both or all sides of questions — including arguments for positions that others revile and want to stigmatize and against positions others seek to immunize from critical scrutiny.»

Listening, as stated above, is critical to hearing what the other side wants.

According to McGonigal, the appeal of SuperBetter (which is played by 125,000 people worldwide) is that unlike many medications that treat such conditions, it has no side effects — and people always want to see what works better than current protocols.

Next, figure out how to get what you want in a way that gets the other side closer to what they want.

But when you say something isn't what I want to hear, you shift the issue over to my side of the table.

Most new hires start on the industrial rather than the commercial / residential side, because the primary contacts tend to be maintenance supervisors who know what they want and aren't shy about demanding it.

An effective negotiator says to himself, «If I'm the other side, what do they want to hear from me?»

The U.S. side needs to be very, very well prepared and know exactly what it wants to achieve, as well as what the U.S. is willing to provide in return.»

If only they had worked together to solve the problem, each side could have gotten what it wanted.

They knew they didn't want to sell the 113 acres on Columbus» north side to developers, but they weren't sure what to do with the property.

Just imagine what you'd want if you were on the other side of the call and let honesty replace your canned response as much as you can.

«We believe in giving people a voice, which means erring on the side of letting people share what they want whenever possible,» he wrote in a post on his Facebook page.

She goes on to offer general but valuable advice like «gather good information» and «anchor with options,» but the real goldmine in her piece might just be a side bar in which she tackles the most fundamental question of all — what exactly do you say to get what you want?

On the flip side, a calcium - rich diet can help you burn more flab, according to a University of Tennessee at Knoxville report, which is exactly what you want if weight loss is your goal.

By domination only one side gets what it wants; by compromise neither side gets what it wants; by integration we find a way by which both sides may get what they wish.»

But when you say that something isn't what I want to hear, you shift the issue over to my side of the table.

We wanted the results to resemble what you get in a deli conveyor belt — lightly toasted on the rounded side and nicely browned on the cut side.

And what China wants more than anything is for both sides to deescalate, but there's no clear path towards that right now.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us togetwhat you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us togetWhat people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us togetwhat to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us togetWhat the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us togetWhat are the overarching principles that bind us together?

I wanted to be an EIR at Trinity Ventures to deepen my understanding of what it's like to be on the other side of the table and to learn the ropes of the venture industry as I transition into a full - time investor.

And, of course, on the other side, you should also be practicing good listening as you fairly consider all of the input offered by your mentor, even when it may not be what you want to hear.

I realized that I wanted to understand markets, and I wanted to go into the research side of the business — so that is what I did.

By stepping onto the other side of the grass, you will be able to think more precisely as to what a buyer wants and how he responds.

The question is: on which side of the equation do you want to be and what are you doing to get there?

Only when I began to think for myself and to question what I had been told, did I see that the «other side» had some valid points — I simply didn't want to hear them, much less attempt to understand them.

People are not asking her what happened and they don't even want her side of anything because the one with position and power spoke.

But it seems to me a genuine alliance, based on the identification of, and resistance to, what both sides perceive as a common threat, namely a progressivism that wants to push traditionalist conservatives off the stage.

It is adorable though that you have some sympathy for Hitler, I'm sure you're going to fall on the right side of history this time, because for the lat 60 years you've got the shaft, what with the whole wanting to kill people and hating on others.

I wanted to see what was waiting on the other side of all of this freedom.

Cloistered in red or blue communities and steeped in tell - me - what - I - want - to - hear media coverage, both sides have duped themselves into believing that our current crisis stems from a failure of the political class — «the swamp» — rather than the tragedy of a divided nation.

What we have is a very large forest, and all each side wants to talk about is all the trees.

I didn't want «Mechanist Atheists» put on the «extremes of thought» side, which is kind of what I heard.

On the other side of the coin, the general public only see what artists want us to see.

This verse is ambiguous, and all sides of the debate need to understand that we tend to force our theology upon the text to get it to say what we want, rather than allow it to remain ambiguous and move on to other texts which might be more clear.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

The answer is simple: do the opposite of what catholics want because you can always expect to find them on the wrong side of any question regarding ethics and morals, especially if science is involved or it shows them to be evil.

But whoever wants, on the other hand, really to behold and receive all truth, and would have the truth - world overhang him as an empyrean of stars, complex, multitudinous, striving antagonistically, yet comprehended, height above height, and deep under deep, in a boundless score of harmony; what man soever, content with no small rote of logic and catechism, reaches with true hunger after this, and will offer himself to the many - sided forms of the scripture with a perfectly ingenuous and receptive spirit; he shall find his nature flooded with senses, vastnesses, and powers of truth, such as it is even greatness to feel.

Fry said he did not want to accept commands from anyone: what about the command of driving on the left hand side of the road?

I also on the flip - side don't want to play according to others rules and demand either, like by political correctness, dismissing some real facts and truth, or being told by what I call liberal fascist and others how I should think, live, eat, read, or believe.

I have been unable to run in what this world might consider the «big» races, but I have been free to run on the back side of the track as much as I wanted.

The selfish side of me however wants you to keep posting, but if that is not what you want to do... who am I (or anyone else for that matter) to stand in the way... right?

I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief of Scripture with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you on, by the way, if you see the world as so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)