I'd like to know
what snowfall records have got to do with AGW.
Not exact matches
The two ice cores from Denali benefited from high levels of
snowfall, providing
what Osterberg says is «amazing reproducibility» of the climate
record and giving the researchers exceptional confidence in the study results.
This year is a case in point, when we now have
record low
snowfall (about 10 % of average, or less), and this time it is because the storms are being directed very much away from Mt. Baker, the opposite to
what happened in 98 - 99).
Also,
what about the polar bear expresses of 1994, 1996,
record snowfall of 2008, then another polar bear express recently?
and «Brunstein's article on Almagre (AAR 1996 by recollection) reported that trapper
records said that the 1840s had huge
snowfall»
What puzzles me was the statement in the beginning: «the tremendous growth pulse in the surviving part of the trunk immediately following the glacier scar.»
But, Watts up with
record snowfalls in Florida, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, Tennessee, Louisiana (no offense to people that live outside of North America... but this is
what I am familiar with)?