Sentences with phrase «what socialism»

What socialism ultimately achieves is that it equalizes everyone in misery.
More importantly, by entering the Democratic Party, Sanders broke with the socialist principle of independent working - class political action.1 He became the «sheepdog» herding progressives, who had the option of voting for the Green ticket of Jill Stein and Ajamu Baraka in the general election, back into a party run by the billionaire class he professes to oppose.2 Nevertheless, the broad liberal to radical American left is now discussing what socialism is and debating whether the Left should be inside or outside the Democratic Party — or both inside and outside.
I suggest you learn what socialism is, and about modern Russia.
If to all the enormous power that the state has anyway you add the power to run the economy, which is what socialism empirically means, the tendency toward creating some sort of totalitarianism becomes extremely strong.
Bloom knew exactly what socialism was and how to move a mob with peer pressure.
If you guys think Obama is Socialist, you don't know what socialism is.
That kind of progress is what socialism, communism or dictatorships are all about.

Not exact matches

«What democratic socialism is about,» Sanders declared, is «that it is immoral and wrong that the top one - tenth of 1 percent in this country... own almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent.»
Wikipedia has good definitions for those discussing Socialism, Marxism, etc. for instance this was under Marxism to distinguish what part the Germans Marx & Engels from Russian Leninism.
What, are you suggesting socialism now?
So to truly apply the mindset of Madison today means to admit what he couldn't quite see: that just as air is to the regrettable existence of fire, and as liberty is to the regrettable existence of faction, so is modern republican government to the regrettable existence of various at - bottom - suicidal democratic mindsets: progressivism, democratic socialism, militant secularism, and libertarianism.
You don't even have a clue what «socialism» means.
For instance, when the Catechism rejects both socialism and capitalism it leaves open the question of what «reasonable regulation» is.
Unlike Marx and others who tried to turn socialism into a science and thought they knew what would happen, Rorty's religion is radically open to, adamantly insistent upon, the new — making possible a life of «pure, joyous hope.»
James Nuechterlein replies: If Mr. Segermark has his way, the word socialism will no longer mean what it has always meant» public ownership and control of the means of production» but something along the lines of «left - wing programs I do not like.»
Not the socially conservative, servant of feel good capitalism that is so prevalent in the U. S. And let's look at it this way, if that mysoginist, drug addicted coward, Rush Limbaugh thinks what the Pope is doing is socialism, then the Pope must be doing something right.
One can not answer the question of what constitutes the just society by pointing to socialism as such, while among capitalist societies there are varying approximations of justice.
«It's sad because this Pope makes it very clear he doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to capitalism and socialism and so forth,» Limbaugh said.
Moreover, these notions are supported by what one might call a prejudice in favor of the collective fostered by socialism.
I want only to show what a mistake it is to confuse Christianity and socialism; they are not the same thing.
Social Christianity (which on the whole is simple socialism), the Bekenntnis Kirche (which, once Hitlerism was defeated, merely aligned itself with anti-Hitlerism, thus with what might be called socio - communism), the ideas of Reinhold Niebuhr (which, while solidly thought out, affected neither church nor society)-- all have failed.
But it is of critical importance to the choice between capitalism and socialism, and it is directly relevant to what he has to say about sin.
What have conservatives offered as an alternative to socialism?
when the churches become advocates for the poor and needy, which will soon overwhelm them, and advocate what amounts to socialism they will be crushed by the fascists.
Berry's idea that we need a planetary socialism — indeed, an ultimate universal socialism — is based on Aquinas's statement that because the divine goodness «could not be adequately represented by one creature alone, he [God] produced many and diverse creatures, that what was wanting to one in the representation of the divine might be supplied by another.»
Limbaugh believes that very clear Pope Francis doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to capitalism and socialism.
If the actions of Christ and his early followers are what people like Rush call communism, socialism and Marxism, then Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ and the early Christians were the greatest Marxists!
What is socialism about going back to Bill clinton tax rate that created 23 million jobs?
Others revel in the mindfields or what can be better disseminated as being spiritual socialisms while they are ever stayed put in their ownliness brain - yards of spiritualized individualisms!
We remember the old question, «What is the difference between capitalism and socialism
«It's sad because this pope makes it very clear he doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to capitalism and socialism and so forth.»
'' «It's sad because this pope makes it very clear he doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to capitalism and socialism...»
If that isn't the core of marxisim, socialism, and communism, then what is it.
What is the reality of socialism, and what are its advantages and disadvantaWhat is the reality of socialism, and what are its advantages and disadvantawhat are its advantages and disadvantages?
But what do we mean by these two terms, capitalism and socialism?
Socialism is the economic system in which the means of production and distribution are owned by the state, which decides through central planning what is to be produced and how it is to be distributed.
At this time Niebuhr was driven into the mild socialism of the «Social Gospel,» but he soon began to do battle against what he called its naivete (its lack of understanding of the depths of sin in individual and society).
Whether or not he is has nothing to do with his unblinking recognition of what he calls the human tragedy of «the system of real socialism
Toward my belief system, religion is a personal belief and should not be a sociable consideration... Anyone's beliefs upon religious conjuring séances should be held personally and not be centered by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keeps one's faith separated from religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational explanations as to why there are reportedly many more of God's many sons then what Christendom so portends there to be...
Toward my belief system, religion is a personal belief and should not be a sociable consideration... Anyone's beliefs upon religious conjuring séances should be held personally and not be centered by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keep one's faith separated from religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational explanations as to why there are reportedly many more of God's many sons then what Christendom so potentially claims there to be...
This is no longer Adam Smith's capitalism, but what I. F. Stone calls «private socialism» — the public takes much or most of the risk; private entrepreneurs take the whole profit.
What the left finds distasteful and dangerous about evangelicalism is not just its conservative biblical hermeneutic, but more importantly, its anti-Communism, opposition to socialism, and — conversely — its free market and pro-business orientation.
In what sense is Tillich's socialism «religious»?
And another one says, «You know, what China could use now is a bit of socialism
What happens has to do with Israel or the church, and not the state or capitalism or socialism.
In interwar Poland the Zionist movement, itself divided into what were almost literally warring factions, was probably the third strongest political tendency in Polish Jewry, behind Bund Socialism and the strictly Orthodox Agudas Israel.
On the other hand, memories are short, as witness a young author who apparently sees nothing terribly problematic in advocating what might aptly be described as national socialism or socialist nationalism, albeit with benign intentions.
Eliminating what so many today feel is the unfair advantage of capitalism is truly just a wish to eliminate capitalism and replace it with some type of pseudo democratic socialism.
More serious is what Bellamy referred to as its «abusive tone about God and religion,» namely the undeniable atheism and materialism that characterized not all kinds of socialism but particularly the most influential strand, Marxism.
What really has this T vs. G trial begotten socialism and governing bodies?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z