But the problem, as ever, is
what societal changes a government could make to fix that.
Not exact matches
What is remarkable is the human capacity — in spite of this intensive
societal indoctrination — to perceive where justice demands
change, to discover that one's society or one's peers are morally wanting.
(I also have a hunch that
what many feel is persecution is really just
societal change.
If they really wanted to
change what is happening they would use the terms «gun safety» or better yet a committee on «
societal breakdown» which is the cause for the horrendous acts!
By honoring the biomechanical design of your body and using it the way nature intended - minimizing sitting and avoid wearing positive heeled shoes (read about
what high heels do to your uterus here), moving in alignment and
changing our
societal beliefs about how women should sit and walk (tailbone tucked, feet close together - you know, «like a lady»).
To
change the perspective of
what education is about, you're talking about alliance building and about making it clear that this is not a kid's problem, but a
societal problem.
Real
societal change comes through the political process, and I would challenge those «protesting» to form a new political party, and articulate a distinctive set of views, so that average Americans could understand
what they stand for.
Ultimately
what is needed are not more scenarios of Anthropocene Apocalypse but more ideas of how a «good Anthropocene» might emerge with the help of new
societal values, new economic rules, landmark political decisions, individual behavior
changes and, yes, new technologies.
If we were able to statistically model
societal inaction on climate
change,
what proportion of the variance would be accounted for by the disinformation efforts of skeptics and false balance by journalists?
As we wrote: «The clips provide a poignant, historical insight into
what scientists knew about climate
change almost four decades ago — and how the world was beginning to react in terms of the resulting geopolitical, technological and
societal ramifications.
Otherwise, we should use the reanalyeses for these impact studies, with, as one set of applications, perturbations prescribed in the impact models to assess at
what level of
change in climate statistics would result in a negative threshold being crossed in one or more key
societal and / or environmental resources.
But
what is the role of the social scientist, as distinct from the natural scientist, in characterizing the climate
change problem and connecting it to
societal decisionmaking?
What is relevant now is the rate of climate
change, the specific causes, and its impact on modern civilisation that is dependent, for agricultural and
societal security, a relatively stable climate.
What are the potential
societal consequences of such a
change?
Views differ on
what, exactly, is the best way for scientists to advocate for
societal action against climate
change.
Societal expectations of
what is reasonable expectations of privacy under the Katz doctrine is constantly
changing and very difficult to assess, and a historical approach to determining privacy interests is much more workable.
Our idea of
what it means to be «a family» is also
changing with
societal trends and
changes.