Sentences with phrase «what teaching reading»

A great reminder about what teaching reading is all about - kids reading books they love and choose themselves.

Not exact matches

So what did all this reading and thinking teach him about the skater lingo of his youth, expressions like, «That's awesome!»

But if you're goal is to hone your brain with a good book, what you want is the title that will teach you the most with the quickest, most enjoyable read.

Planet Fitness CEO Chris Rondeau shares what more than 25 years of working at the same company has taught him and the only leadership book he's ever read.

It's unfortunate that MOST of the comments i've read so far are against what this man had teached.

And while I am not a Christian (or any other organized religion) I do believe that Christ was on earth, he gave the Romans a lot of trouble and paid for it, but his teachings, if we believe what we read, were sound.

We invite you to read the articles «Ye Need Not That Any Man Teach You» and «Church and what it means» listed on our website http://www.aworlddeceived.ca

If you ever read into the context of what Jesus said, a lot of the advice and he was giving was contrary to what's the Pharisees would have taught.

It is obvious that the major majority of the posts I have read are submitted by those who do not have a clue of what the Bible teaches, nor what the earth and the heavens actually teach.

Anyone reading this childish, scientifically ignorant, fairy tale will either become an atheist on the spot or will at least doubt what they have been taught.

The pastor said of what he has read about Mourdock's remarks, they largely lined up with the church's teachings on the sanctity of life and their belief that life begins at conception.

They always seem to be bound by what they were taught or read.

-- Again read what the church teaches not what you think it teaches.

You'd know his truth if you read the Bible and stop listening to your nonbeliever sites that haven't a clue to what Jesus teaches.

Most people seem to think that what they believe is exactly what the Bible teaches, and if people would read the Bible, they would come to the same beliefs.

The majority of christians have no idea about their faith or what it is to be christian, you see them spout nonsense from a bible they have never read and judge or even hate others who do not believe their beliefs, all the while not knowing they are going against its teachings.

And it perhaps suggests that Christians are reading their Bibles for themselves and are not afraid to challenge what they regard as false teaching.

I would say to any person commenting on your 10 Ways the Non-Violent Atonement Changes Your Theology blog, to read your book first (its not an expensive purchase) before launching into any detailed discussion or disagreement.It answers many of the potential concerns people have and gets the reader to reflect very strongly on what they have been taught about the atonement and to put on a new set of glasses when reading scripture.

Over the summer, I've been teaching and reading the prophet Habakkuk, whose wisdom seems to be what Jesus is driving at here.

If, as the Church had always taught, the Bible contained God's revelation to man, every man (they urged) ought to be able to read it for himself, and not to be dependent upon what might reach him by indirect channels.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

'' I have no idea what Bell is trying to prove; but the lost of income» — it doesn't make a lot of sense for a man of no faith to teach at; Christian schools... «his wife» — not related, read the story... «and potentially his home» - once again, related to his jobs at Christian schools.

I've been reading the monastics recently, and it strikes me that while much of modern evangelicalism echoes their teachings on self - control and self - denial when it comes to sexuality, we tend to gloss over a lot what this great cloud of monastic witnesses has to say about self - control and self - denial in other areas of life — like materialism, food, relationships, and hospitality.

Does it help it fit better with what we read in the teachings of Jesus and the writings of Paul?

What they lost to was a radical, liberal read of what Jesus» teaching was regarding human equality and loving your «neighbor», and I think the same thing will win the day hWhat they lost to was a radical, liberal read of what Jesus» teaching was regarding human equality and loving your «neighbor», and I think the same thing will win the day hwhat Jesus» teaching was regarding human equality and loving your «neighbor», and I think the same thing will win the day here.

The final three chapters of the book dealt with the Holy Spirit in the book of Revelation (chap 6), what Revelation reveals about the New Jerusalem (chap 7), and how we can read, teach, and understand the book of Revelation today (chap 7).

How many «Christians» have read the whole sermon from Jesus and gotten what he was teaching?

However, it seems you come on to my blog, and without spending more than a few minutes reading what I believe, accuse me of failing to adequately read what Calvinists teach.

I tend to be reading the Bible to work out what it teaches.

By reading the letter He wrote to ALL (the Bible) and stop listening to tradition of men teachings that stroke your ego of what you want to hear instead of what He wants you to hear.

Assuming the reading material was not that which encourages violations of Exodus 34:16, and related material, then that cause for being fired is even worse than being fired for daring to think that perhaps what he was doing, was not what Jesus taught.

he may want to read Luke's account but the reason I chime in here is to encourage all to find what the bible really teaches.

When I read this, about 15 years ago, I was stunned that God wanted His people to use the tithe to celebrate with our families and to help the less financially «properous» people (instead of judging them) I had such mixed feelings, of freedom and joy in God but also a kind of betrayal from what has been taught, almost to scare us.

if you are a christian you need to go back to your bible and read the sermon on the mount then tell every one what the true word of christ is and what jesus taught....

Sorry about the tangents, but it's always a great point in a post to quote the great Thoreau, I think he captures the heart of what I desire in all humanity: «A truly good book teaches me better than to read it.

One example would be Aimee Dorr Leifer's essay entitled «Teaching with Television and Film,» (TTF) published in N. L. Gage's The Psychology of Teaching Methods, a widely read Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education.1 Even in this essay, however, Leifer reviews what has been learned from various psychological studies of television and film narratives, and the limited range of the studies limits the vision of narrative teaching that she putTeaching with Television and Film,» (TTF) published in N. L. Gage's The Psychology of Teaching Methods, a widely read Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education.1 Even in this essay, however, Leifer reviews what has been learned from various psychological studies of television and film narratives, and the limited range of the studies limits the vision of narrative teaching that she putTeaching Methods, a widely read Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education.1 Even in this essay, however, Leifer reviews what has been learned from various psychological studies of television and film narratives, and the limited range of the studies limits the vision of narrative teaching that she putteaching that she puts forth.

Most «Christians» don't practice the teachings of Jesus, they just look for what's «wrong» with other people according to their readings of the Bible.

When I read the New Testament and see what Christ does, I see an empathetic, loving teacher who taught that the greatest commandment is to love one another.

The reason for this, I'm convinced, is that new faculty — though very smart and well read (and probably better educated than most of their senior colleagues), though religiously observant and already experienced in teaching, though flexible, open and good - humored — have not found a vocation, do not know what purpose they want to serve.

Let me read it like a ten or 12 - year - old would — what would be the obvious teaching of this book?»

Lately I have been encouraged to read the scriptures without infusing my own thoughts, or what I've heard others say, or teach about the bible.

Anyway, If you read the Bible, you'll see what Jesus taught about this.

He read what Whitehead had written as physicist and said to himself and others, «This man should be teaching philosophy.»

Compare what you read to what «Christians» are doing and it will be easy to tell, if those «Christians» are following the teachings or not.

Because the your whims come of, to me, as harsh and hate filled and comment of the supposed Christians that preach hate in miss direction, oh ya that is what Jesus taught Read the Bible!

Well, grab the bible, read it, and think on about what your reading... and compare the message of the Christ with the religions that you see around you and ask yourself... Is this religion teaching this?

If the people like those whose posts we read here, are the ones whose views, teachings and counsel our children will inherit, what will their destiny end up to be?

Read loses sight of Buber's concept of dialogue, however, when he suggests that Buber's teaching shows how to replace the inter-individual tensions of the classroom by «an organic mode of adaptation to the social organism as a whole» and when he reinterprets the teacher's concentration of an effective world as a selective screen in which what is kept in and what is left out is determined by the organic social pattern through the medium of the teacher's «sense of a total organism's feeling - behaviour.»

As a result, when they read in Scripture what Jesus has to say about the Kingdom, they completely misunderstand what He was teaching because they think He was only talking about something that will affect us after we die.

I think if you read it, you will see what the Bible clearly teaches about submitting to those in authority, and then you will be able to recommend it to your readers, and they will see the truth also.