It also matters how that achievement gap is being measured and by
what testing methodology.
Not exact matches
A major advantage of Agile
methodologies is that practitioners have had more than 25 years to
test and codify
what works and
what doesn't.
Notably, the engineers developed eight dissociating elements, and after extensive
testing on different types of contaminated water, implemented a unique
methodology that indicates
what and how much of each element should be combined.
It's a
test that uses psychological
methodology to determine your levels of openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism — or, put more simply, it's a way for us to find out
what it is that makes you unique.
It's a
test that uses psychological
methodology to determine your levels of openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism — or, put more simply, it's a way for us to find out
what it that makes you unique.
This
test uses psychological
methodology to determine your levels of openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism — in other words, it looks at
what makes you unique.
The result of that survey is the National Education Technology Plan, which highlights the challenge of improving
test scores among an increasingly tech - savvy student population while using traditional teaching
methodologies, and emphasizes
what it calls «e-learning» and virtual schools.
Perhaps the real division needs to be to create a subject which is the application of climate science — to create clear (melted ice) between climate science which is based on the scientific
methodology and the null hypothesis and «climate prediction» where the «best» predictions are made based on the balance of evidence but there is no pretence that these predictions have or even can be
tested (except by comparison to
what happens... which I have to point out isn't climate «science's» / forecasters strong card!)
From
what I remember of the M&W rejoinder, Lasso criticism was addressed by using additional
methodologies in their «null proxy» witholding
tests (e.g. CPS).
What's more, the scientific
methodology for proving a theory has been ignored BECAUSE HADCRU et al looks only for data that supports AGW rather than searching,
testing and publishing data that does not support the desired outcome.
New York utilizes
what is known as the «Frye»
test for the admissibility of scientific expert testimony, which requires that experts rely on
methodologies that are generally accepted within the scientific community in reaching their conclusions.
To be fair, Opera admits that it may be an apples - to - oranges comparison to Microsoft's
tests, considering that Microsoft did not disclose
what methodology it used to
test its browser.
What is a suitable exam structure and
testing methodology?