Sentences with phrase «what wrong answers»

Likewise, you should always know what wrong answers could be presented to test your understanding of any vocabulary word or new concept.

Not exact matches

Because, de Botton answers in a fascinating recent blog post, those feelings, however uncomfortable, are a useful signal of what is going wrong in your work life.

«Worst day» answers tell whether a person is a team player — if their response focuses on what went wrong without taking any ownership, there is a good chance they won't thrive in a collaborative environment.»

«Don't just launch into what you think is the answer, because it's probably the wrong problem you're solving.»

In the same vein, some interviewers may be a little bit too focused on what a candidate's answers are, with right and wrong answers preloaded in their brains and notepads.

In this week's column, our Team Digital answers: When it comes to SEO, what are most business owners doing wrong?

To answer what's wrong with that, imagine a powerful blowtorch focused on your legs for a prolonged period.

The question - and - answer site Quora recently elicited a thread full of thoughtful, clear - eyed, and actionable answers to the question What are Millennials doing wrong when it comes to their careers?»

The Wrong Answer Could Cost you Managing an Independent Contractor: Finding the Right Fit Before you start your search for the contractor — or even put out feelers — you should be able to clearly define what services you need provided.

It's one thing to respond to atheists who think you have the wrong answers or seekers who think you might have part of a bigger answer, but what of those who think you are answering questions that don't even need to be asked?

Ya, all the ideas are wrong, what mister «pastor» says is right... The answer is in the bible, but he never quotes texts explaining why suffering.

â $ œDonâ $ ™ t let others spoil your faith and joy with their philosophy, wrong and shallow answers based on manâ $ ™ s thoughts and ideas rather than what Christ has taughtâ $ (Col. 2:8)

anyway, if you heard an atheist ask you a question about any type of belief and really try to make your answer seem wrong then they are wrong, they can not nor will not ever be able to discuss any type of belief due to what they know.

The answer has never been obvious to the Saints, and, what is more, they often got it wrong.

If we ask ourselves, «what is wrong with the world today,» our first answer should be: we are.

sumday, What is this kids day «Bobby does so I can too», It does not answer the fundamental question, is the action of selling to your enemy morally right or morally wrong?

What intrigues me is that you were so positive you had all the right answers then (traditional Baptist theology) and anyone who questioned them was wrong.

The issue of organs is very important because you still have not answered the big question, at what point is it wrong to kill the continuation of human life, which we both agree continues with the sper.m and egg and why is it at that point and not before?

If I were a traditionalist Catholic, I would ask Wuthnow these questions: What is wrong with «ready - made» answers?

Why will always be the wrong question when it comes to God stuff, and when we receive an answer we still say «Yes but» or «yes but what if».

scott god also told us not to judge, so let cleflo do cleflo and you do you if you do nt understand how to percieve gods word than it could also be you i remember when i first got saved i was taught a lots of religion stuff but i kept running after god and not after man and he revile some things to me thur his holy spirit watch what you say about gods people cause we all have issues and with that being said be blessed and if hes doing wrong by gods word than he has to answer to god not you so why set yourself up to be curse for it god do nt need your help in nothing stay free cause who god set free is free indeed.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

Morality isn't just about WHAT is right and wrong... it is also about WHY it is right and wrong and «because I said so» does not answer that issue.

The answer is simple: do the opposite of what catholics want because you can always expect to find them on the wrong side of any question regarding ethics and morals, especially if science is involved or it shows them to be evil.

its amazing you guys read a few books grow your hair long and say you have no answers but you are sure that whats being done now is wrong check the word their are 6 days a week the church «can be the church» I MISS THE OLD PRE SEMINARY jeremy i know one day he will return he Loves the Savior to much not to

There are many answers to Father Greeley's question «What went wrong?»

I heard it asked what if you are wrong to a Christian, the answer nothing.

The seven - year - old child climbs right in somehow and curls up in a ball and doesn't answer when I ask what's wrong.

And you didn't answer my question either And what are you even talking about, I don't believe that there is anything false in the Bible, prove me wrong

Seriously, I remember when I was in college, there would be these people, called professors, that would even say my answer is wrong and give me points off my test... the nerve of them how dare they not be open to my ideas and beliefs as to how physics work, or what Poe point was, or what actually happen during Roman occupation....

And what is at stake in these questions — what, exactly, is endangered if we get the answers wrong?

His answer to that question was that, while there is general agreement as to what is wrong with the world, the real problem is that we can not agree on what would be right.

What does it say about you if you answer, «No, I could NOT be wrong»?

What could possibly be wrong with having the answer?

No answers in your last part of the post about what was wrong with what I stated, your age or why are you in the fray.

From my perspective, nothing is wrong with having the answer, but is the answer true, or can we KNOW (at this moment in time) if the answer is true, or what the answer is?

bob said, on September 18th, 2009 at 9:15 pm fishon said, «What could possibly be wrong with having the answer?»

I often find «Christian Dramas» cheesey but not this one for some reason — I've watched it 4 or 5 times and I cry every time — as far as how you interpret what Jesus should or should not being doing during this presentation that is up to the artist who created the work — there is no right or wrong answer here.

This is certainly not the place to answer the vexing problem of what went wrong.

«So what is wrong with a question» — especially when it is the question, the question we were meant to answer with our very lives?

When I asked him what was wrong, he answered «I'm not little anymore.»

But I cant help but wonder if I knew what was going wrong in my old church, is leaving the answer?

What is wrong with living without answers, other than it is very difficult to do.

The questions also didn't attempt to ask what kind of job at that business would be right / wrong to do... When I answered the survey, I automatically thought of working at the strip club to mean being a stripper or perhaps a bartender.

To answer questions and build up an assortment takes both interest in the allergic customer as well as knowledge about allergies and what could happen if it go wrong.

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

Facts are irrelevant to a degree — what you see on the pitch is reality - and the true facts are we have been gradually declining year on year and my article is a question that is hypothetical as there isn't a right answer or wrong answer..

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

every time i walk towards that pitch or t.v i hope they win and now i feel irritated more disconnected to this team heard a fan voiced his frustration and had a fued with other disapproving arsenal fans, i don't what is wrong with Wenger but the whole is not answering to him or he is not interested in them.

............... I du n no if gotze is the answer to our DM or ST deficiency, but we definitely need those areas covered...... What the hell is wrong with Wenger?