Sentences with phrase «whatever argument i was making»

I could make any outlandish claim I wanted to if I picked the right data points in a time series (i.e., the ones that suited whatever argument I was making), and there are many data points on the zero anomaly trend line.

Progressives, moderates, independents (particularly those in the U.S. Republican Party) will assign the label as they see fit to advance whatever argument they are making.

Not exact matches

«As to seeing every atom or whatever your bs argument, you are the one making the claim here» - And what claim was that exactly?

As to seeing every atom or whatever your bs argument, you are the one making the claim here.

The thing was with the college was more of the academic rigour and making an argument for an approach being consistent with the Christian faith more than whatever choice was made about that.

Unless you're trying to play on the 3rd grade argument that god can't make a rock he can't lift or whatever.

When you said everyone or whatever the pronoun was, did you mean the Israelites or the people they were fighting or everyone in the story Then address those supposedly unfounded arguments I made, don't say that I haven't responded because you just admitted that I have

The bullpen, maybe the defense, maybe how the lineup is constructed, maybe the bench, whatever, pick your argument and make it the best you can.

I think it's a dumb argument to make in a 7 - 0 game, though, where obviously whatever he would have done got thrown out the window by midway through the game.

Makes for nonsensical, contrived arguments — especially for the shouters who are quite happy to accept whatever they hear as fact.

I get that Miami gets players into the best shape, and you could make an argument that for whatever reason Washington's culture does not encourage their players to be in peak physical form.

Was he drawing a different tradition or was he developing his ideas through his polemics, kind of making it up from whatever argument carried the dWas he drawing a different tradition or was he developing his ideas through his polemics, kind of making it up from whatever argument carried the dwas he developing his ideas through his polemics, kind of making it up from whatever argument carried the day?

One can make whatever argument you wishes to the House considering an impeachment, or to the Senate trying an impeachment, but ultimately, this would be about convincing representatives and senators to agree with your argument, not convincing a judge (although a judge does preside over a Presidential impeachment and senators might be inclined to defer to the rulings of that judge).

I think the best skeptics do, but that was his argument, and he just couldn't believe that sometimes skeptics would dare to make fun of a believer in whatever belief.

It has something in common with 24 in that it makes an argument that the police should be allowed to do whatever they want, but 24 is nuanced and thoughtful in a way this isn't (and 24 ain't that nuanced or thoughtful).

LGBT people are not necessarily as easily identified as blacks or Native Americans, and because LGBT occurs across racial divides (and because so many LGBT individuals already are professionals, artists, actors, whatever), it's more difficult for white supremacist types to make the same arguments about them.

And is there a place for this argument: As an individual, I get to make decisions about what I want to do, based on whatever criteria and opinions I want.

Doesn't that follow whatever argument is being made here?

A genuine scientist, of whatever discipline, will be capable of assessing both sides of the argument and making his / her own judgement.

RE # 44 & 45, I hope you're not making the contrarian argument that whatever GHGs humans emit are aborbed into nature, and it is only nature's GHGs that are up there in the atmosphere, or that somehow human emissions are absorbed first, and nature's emissions lasre not making the contrarian argument that whatever GHGs humans emit are aborbed into nature, and it is only nature's GHGs that are up there in the atmosphere, or that somehow human emissions are absorbed first, and nature's emissions last.

Unlike mainstream scientists, she said, skeptics like Soon are «available to make whatever arguments his sponsors think need to be made.»

Thereby making Climate Change into something of a farce, by simply taking whatever conflicts with desire, asserting the opposite, then finding some argument to further the necessary belief that said assertion is valid.

The criteria you gave aren't even measurable and even if they were they wouldn't support your argument because for whatever reason you've decided to make the enormous claim that the IPCC output is «dogma» which requires enormous evidence.

Whatever the merit of the argument for natural gas as a bridge fuel may be (never quite decided myself), that bridge is a lot more frayed now than when people started making the argument a decade or so ago.

I leave it to objective readers here to determine whether the blogger's claim is valid and whether whatever point I made about «losing an argument» was valid or not.

I think there are arguments for both sides, but I'd say that we've probably hit a tipping point where reinvention and the promise of more elequent methods of making primary law into something new and unique and useful in unexpected ways will drive whatever information has not slipped into commodity status into that category very soon.

Obviously in doing so she relies on the justice system to respect its own systems and procedures, but she also makes whatever arguments she needs to in order to ensure that it does so, and that those procedures and structures allow her client's case to be heard.

I rationalized it, whether it's accurate or not, that any judge who's upholding their duty as a judge is going to make a fair and impartial ruling not based on the attorney, but based on the facts and the presentation and whatever argument it is.

The court is going to be focused on the best interests of the children, so whatever argument is presented to the judge must be made in that light.

In response to these arguments, the Court of Appeal found that whatever damage Google was pointing to had already been done, as the Supreme Court of British Columbia had found jurisdiction to make the order.

However, Mr Justice Langstaff ruled that the legal challenge had failed, stating the transitional order was «properly made, whatever the merits of arguments about its consequences».

Having been interviewed for a specific position by a creative director there who had little interests in my portfolio, my work, my experience, I can offer you the polar opposite argument to the comments made in the article by that company's H.R. rep, director, manager, president, boss — whatever they call these people now - a-days.

Whatever course is chosen, the goal must be to protect them from adult arguments and tensions and make sure they maintain close, open family relationships.