Sentences with phrase «whatever changes we see»

Wenger as well would have a full week to try to implement whatever changes he saw fit.

If your book isn't already good, already clean, they probably won't even off your a deal — and if they do, they'll expect you to make whatever changes they see fit.

As a result, whatever changes we see in society will have a definite impact on what happens in our schools.

I'm a broker as well as a flipper and I know several «big time» high volume brokers who just won't list a house unless its either staged (if vacant) or if its occupied, they'll bring someone in to assess the seller's furniture, etc and make whatever changes they see necessary to make the place look just right to sell.

Not exact matches

But whatever the cause, if the current trends continue and we see fewer and fewer investors holding an ever - larger proportion of muni bonds, the traditional retail - oriented muni market will change dramatically in the not - too - distant future.

If you could manage to set aside your anger and condescension and read both of our posts at whatever speed you like, you will see that you did indeed say that at 11:22 you said (verbatim) that America is a «two party system which only legislation is likely to change.»

I have had periods in my married life when, due to job changes or whatever, I have been out of meaningful relationship with friends I could see regularly.

I could easily see changing up the fruit to whatever is in season!

But if they aren't being listened to or the things they want to see changed aren't changing, then use that as motivation to continue to pursue whatever you're passionate about so you can get a to a level where people have to listen.

Let's be sensible here.Like it or not we have lost Sanchez.We are getting a vast improvement on Walcott in Mikki with (please god) Abua joining as well.Sanchez wanted to go so let's move on.I believe these 2 signings could reignite us and the credit will be with Sven and not Wenger.Soon everyone will start to give credit to Ivan Gaz as without doubt his Catylis For Change is beginning to take effect.12 months ago if we had banked the money for Coq Wally and That Chilean C *** what would we have done with it?Sven M is influencing transfer policy now without doubt.We have no option other than to be patient this season and just take whatever we get from Europa League and Caro Cup.Anything above 6th in Premier League let's take as a bonus.I can't help but believe we are seeing something happening that we are nor used to.

Let's be sensible here.Like it or not we have lost Sanchez.We are getting a vast improvement on Walcott in Mikki with (please god) Abua joining as well.Sanchez wanted to go so let's move on.I believe these 2 signings could reignite us and the credit will be with Sven and not Wenger.Soon everyone will start to give credit to Ivan Gaz as without doubt his Catylis For Change is beginning to take effect.12 months ago if we had banked the money for Coq Wally and That Chilean C *** what would we have done with it?Sven M is influencing transfer policy now without doubt.We have no option other than to be patient this season and just take whatever we get from Europa League and Caro Cup.Anything above 6th in Premier League let's take as a bonus.I can't help but believe we are seeing something happening that we are nor used to.Things are different because Wenger has lost his influence.

Tis good we have players back but I see no proof that we have changed / stopped whatever it is / was that gives us soooooo many injuries in the first place?

All you guys are now blaming both coach and players alike.wait till Wednesday when arsenal will put four past westham, you'll change your tone to praise singing like four things you guys learnt from the game and whatever crap you can think of.erratic fans behavior like which you can only find in arsenal should make one reconsider his support for arsenal.you know so much about football but I haven't seen any of you applying for coaching job at atsenal.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I agree that for whatever reason SANCHEZ holds a grudge is against WENGER mostly and it was definitely by benching him against Pool in probably the most critical game for us last season, if the man is not happy let him go, we don't need a disgruntled player in our dressing room no matter who he is, now this being said, it was because of him that we are now seeing changes and active transfer window, WENGER motivated and actively pursuing WC players, looking to drop under performing players, if it was not because ALEXIS and the Fans who last year had their voice heard and made it clear to the board and WENGER that is enough is enough....

Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!

If you bypass the importance of doing / saying whatever you can do to see that healthy foods are offered in the schools then you short change students» ability to learn.

Would viewers really want to see JO welcomed in, allowed to change whatever he wanted to with no resistance whatsoever, with the result that everyone lives happily ever after?

But whatever the case may be, the tweaks and changes made during these times must be seen as temporary adaptations to temporary situations.

Whatever it is you're experiencing, whether sleepiness, feeling time pressured, stuck in traffic with a screaming baby, see if you can label the situation without judgment or immediately trying to change it.

Throughout the last 100 days Salmond is convinced things are moving his way: «Whatever is happening it is not being fully recorded in most polls» (29 June); there's «a real change in the air» (25 July); and «it's perplexing that we haven't as yet seen the same movement in the polls that I'm detecting on the ground» (16 August).

In 2006 Labour tried to portray David Cameron as «Dave the Chameleon», a bicycle riding blue reptile who changes his colours — see what they did there — to suit whatever populist message was in vogue.

«I see my job as making a change in that by helping in whatever way I can with my background in linguistics and with some handle on the resources at the university.»

Whatever the outcome, HDST will change how we see our place in the Universe.

Maybe the big idea here is that nothing has changed in Australia in all the time since Power saw whatever horror film give him a yen to make this movie.

I also wonder if this architecture will underpin the rumored 960 (or whatever) in an effort to get such a car on the market with minimal costs and changing the concept to a refried 928 (see another comment below for that idea).

Add in the fact that, for whatever reason, publishing doesn't seem able to adapt to changing customer demands, and I find myself wondering how long it will be before we see the major publishers shrinking in number again.

I see about 10:1 sales of ebooks to paperback, and I don't do ANY reformatting or cover changes... Whatever else you want to say, Amazon has given us a world of new authors to try, and I'm staying under the $ 5 price point to hopefully entice more buyers to try my books.

Now with agency pricing back in full swing, and publishers putting whatever price they want on their eBooks (per the Hachette / Amazon dispute), I think you're going to see a surge of pricing changes in 2015.

Whatever your dog is taking in determines its level of health and by changing its diet you should see benefits within weeks.

Whatever it is I'm sure it's going to be based off of Smash 4's engine so I don't think you'll see too much of a change.

Sure they can charge whatever they want but once they see that the numbers a low, they'll change their tune.

Whatever you can see, you can reach, but you'll need to pay attention to the weather, as changes in climate can affect the environment!

Whatever their gender affiliation, Ruffnecks go hard when all around them they see weakness, softness, compromise, sermonizing, poverty, and lack; they don't change the world through conscious actions, instead they build themselves into the world one assault at a time.»

«This building was altered and changed to accommodate whatever operation it had going so we started to see this as just a continuation of all the changes that had happened over time.

It revealed little change in responses to the exhibition: «[I] t is a little melancholy to see such a profusion of budding talent when one society offers a decent living for only a small number of «pure» artists... Whatever their abilities, the young artists themselves are in no doubt about their vocation.

And if this is related to the stadium wave idea, whatever, we could see this dynamic changing sometime in the 2030s.

Everyone sees Paris as an opportunity to hitch whatever issue they care about, whatever demand they have for the world community, to the very large wagon of «climate change.»

I don't dismiss out of hand the choice to simply deal with whatever consequences climate change brings, but rather it is my considered opinion that this would be the most foolish decision ever seen in history.

Whatever the cause — global hydrological and climate variability — extreme drought, extreme floods and extreme temperature changes such as has not been seen in the past century — will occur again.

Tell me, too, how someone who sees things as you do — all built into Bayesianism; no need to address whether the problem is different priors or different sources of information relevant to truth - seeking likelihood ratios vs. a form of biased perception that opportunisitcally bends whatever evidence is presented to fit a preconception; no need apparently either for empirical study on any of this — can straighten out someone who says the key to dispelling public conflict over climate change is just to disseminate study findings on scientific consensus.

... «When you hear a phrase like he said, «the highest ever,» you know, «off the charts,» «record setting,» that's a good sign that on top of a whatever local weather patterns there are or regional like El Nino, global warming, fossil fuel driven climate change is putting its finger on the scale and juicing the atmosphere and causing the even bigger weather event than you would have otherwise seen.»

If we could see ahead to 2111, when the temperature (anomaly) is 3º C instead of 0ºC and the CO2 concentration is approaching 600 ppm, when the ice caps are gone and Greenland is called whatever might be the Chinese word for breadbasket, we couldn't tell whether the climate change was natural or anthropogenic.

The Oslo murderer's motives have nothing whatever to do with Climate Change, but it seems that some among the AGW camp can't see beyond his having visited a few climate change websites and left comChange, but it seems that some among the AGW camp can't see beyond his having visited a few climate change websites and left comchange websites and left comments.

Their arguments are few: • I haven't seen real change in Iowa, just the usual variability (from an Iowa farmer) • there is disagreement among respected scientists, so I can take whatever position I want and run with it, loudly and forcefully (a popular argument in all discussions, although scientists in the same position often become less assertive about their position).

Whatever the truth my be on the tiny amount of cliamte change any human will ever see, the facts on enrgy are clear «For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature can not be fooled.»

My opinion, which I tell my students, is that knowing the fundamentals, knowing the basics — whatever area you work in, climate economics or ecological sciences — addressing and studying climate change problems requires an interdisciplinary approach and sooner or later that person who is very much well - versed in the fundamentals of his or her own choice of areas will see the avenue directing to the major issue of climate change or climate science.

See e.g. http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm When you look at the history of climate science, the null hypothesis actually was that whatever humankind would dump in the atmosphere couldn't possibly change the climate (or affect our health).

Even if Trump himself were gone tomorrow, the nation still faces simmering crises (falling energy return on investment, increasing economic inequality, over-reliance on debt, climate change) that appear to be leading toward collapse of government and the economy; meanwhile, as a result of political polarization, social fragmentation, plain old corruption (see NRA), and truth decay we are losing whatever ability we ever had to address those crises.

The IPCC * itself * acknowledges that there has been no such warming now for the last 16 - 17 years; that no dramatic imminent change is seen to that for the next couple of years at least; that the previous spell of 15 years or so was precisely the duration of warming that underlay so much of the evidence cited for its alarms of the long and terrible global trend if forecast; that not a single model the IPCC had or has seems to have come even close to predicting what we've now seen; that the IPCC can only suggest possible explanations for all this so logically meaning it can have no reason to believe that whatever is causing it isn't going to continue forever; that more and more studies are coming in attributing global temperatures not to CO2 but instead other things such as solar fluctuations; that a number of predictions are now coming in that in fact say we are now in for a lengthy period of * cooling.