Sentences with phrase «whatever issue they're having»

It's just a country... you might want to get over whatever issues you have with it.

Social issues are best left to society rather than government, and I always believe we can work out whatever issues we have with logic and reason rather than with polarized rhetoric or violence.

They all need to sit down and thrash out whatever issues they have and get over them before the next match.

«I would not allow whatever issue I have with the IDC to interfere with our ability to do raise the age for our young people,» she said.

«It being a state agency we're going to work very hard to work through whatever issues they've got,» McMackin said.

The sales managers were great as well explained the benefits of the car I chose and explained whatever issues I had with the model.

There are no unsolved problems so whatever the issue you have, we will help you.

With that long delay, hopefully they ironed out whatever issues they had.

Whatever issue you have... if you are not where you want to be, or you're just ready to make things happen, give me a call at [phone].

When it's your turn to speak, you get the floor for as long as you need to fully express your feelings and perspective on whatever issue you've chosen to discuss.

It is also important for both spouses to understand that each of you must be able to accept your role in whatever issues have developed in the marriage, and be willing to make the necessary adjustments.

Not exact matches

Make sure you have an annual meeting, even if it's only by telephone, and keep board minutes that document whatever issues were discussed.

The director chair's table can support whatever activity you've got in mind — from typing out emails to issuing newsletters.

Who hasn't faced the challenge of being asked for a document, looking fruitlessly across several shared drives, and then searching for clues among email and team messaging streams — only to be caught up in a fresh breaking issue that makes us lose track of whatever we were looking for in the first place?

But whatever the merits of this specific case — and however the three judges rule — there is a broader issue that speaks to the reason we have patent laws in the first place.

Whatever the reason, the issue of censorship on Facebook — and especially censorship of journalists and news outlets — is a serious concern, but one which the company has so far refused to confront head on.

@Acroyear: «Researchers however, can access other sources of research, or do their own, targeted research for whatever it is they need, using grants from the government, which I have no issue with.»

But, with the relentless intellectual energy he has always brought to bear on whatever issue is before him, he still can't resist the jibes at ideas he thinks are wrong - headed.

The digital currency would be centralized and issued at will by a government body, at whatever times and in whatever quantities it saw fit.

Even if the greenbacks had not been issued and bonds had been sold at whatever price they would bring in the market, inflation would have taken place.

When central bankers who issue fiat money have the discretion to alter monetary policy from month to month, to do whatever seems desirable at the moment, they also have a problem of the same sort.

I just think as Christians we should have a higher standard than what we are portraying in the media concerning this issue... I can not find the reason why gay people can not be our equals in our churches — if they can be my neighbors then they can also be my friends — and if friends — then they shoud have all the access to whatever it is I do.

The Christian Institute's Deputy Director Humphrey Dobson said: «Whatever your view of David Cameron's premiership it is saddening that he has chosen to highlight this deeply controversial issue as his legacy.

What finally emerged in the summer of 1518 from this frantic rethinking — recall that Luther was trying to work through the theological issue while at the same time explaining to the world why he shouldn't be burned at the stake for heresy — seems to have been shaped primarily by reflection on texts such as Matthew 16:19: «Whatever you loose on earth is loosed in heaven.»

Now you'll have no COPAY for your cramps, and not only am I going to pay for whatever it is that I take for my cramps, but I get to pay for your cramping issues too!

Whatever the Court may have intended by its Casey language, he said, one simply can not excise it from context and apply it willy - nilly to facts that were not even remotely at issue in the case.

even my daughter would understand this as meaning that there was once a book in whatever language and then someone printed it in another one and there was an issue... it doesn't state that the FIRST bible ever was in latin now did it?

I read a while back that UK Catholics were being asked for donations to finance the trip, so I figured that at least * that * money wouldn't go to the Church as regular «Sunday» donations; but whatever part of it that the UK has to pop for is, I suppose, an issue between the populace and their gov «t.

even my daughter would understand this as meaning that there was once a book in whatever language and then someone printed it in another one and there was an issue...»

All atheists are, whatever they label themselves, are people who have some sort of anger issue with God, that they blame God for.

There is no doubt in it that you have not created yourself someone or whatever your believes are you have been created you can call it whatever name you choose and there are physical laws in that universe so you can call that force behind those fundamental laws is The Creator so Creator is not an issue it is religious practice we may disagree with each other

Serious inquiry supports civility in public life, inquisition damages it, and whatever reservations some might have about his positions on particular issues, these essays show Michnik to be very much a mainstay of that civility.

While I would not identify my position with the extremes of pragmatism, it is, nonetheless, a healthy reminder that religious truth, whatever may be the case with other kinds of truth, involves issues of value, of consequences, of the quality of lived existence.

In short, when I dealt with issues other than the condition of nature, the sense of being part of that nature, whatever my explicit doctrines, had little affect on what I said.

The issue is whether we can have a plausible idea of how it could have been possible, and by plausible I mean self - consistent and consistent with whatever historical facts we have.

I am tired of being called «narrow», an «extremist», «tribal» or whatever whenever I have spoken about this issue.

The philosophy of absolute idealism, so vigorously represented both in Scotland and America to - day, has to struggle with this difficulty quite as much as scholastic theism struggled in its time; and although it would be premature to say that there is no speculative issue whatever from the puzzle, it is perfectly fair to say that there is no clear or easy - issue, and that the only obvious escape from paradox here is to cut loose from the monistic assumption altogether, and to allow the world to have existed from its origin in pluralistic form, as an aggregate or collection of higher and lower things and principles, rather than an absolutely unitary fact.

And again: «The issue today is not communism versus whatever we have.

Issues such as racism, sexism, classism, heterosexism, handicapism, anthropocentrism, and whatever other «isms» we have devised toward the ill - being of peoples require more than an analysis of individual sin to account for the pervasiveness and depth of the problem.

Boldest: Mason Slater with «Bachmann, Liberty U, and Women in Ministry» «On Wednesday, Liberty University featured Bachmann as their convocation speaker.That's not the issue though, they can have whatever speaker they would like, and I'm sure Bachmann is the sort of speaker you would like if you like that sort of thing.

It would be safe to say that the majority of Atheists have no issue with you believing whatever you would like to believe, however the majority of religious based folks expect others to obey or at the least acknowledge something that can not be proven without faith.

I don't have an issue with this but it's curious that if only 4.6 %, or whatever percent it would be now in 2012, of the UK population is Muslim, why is Mohammed the top male name?

The next issue had to open with «Whatever became of that President - elect?

In my judgment, a good continuing education course for the minister should begin where the minister has his problems; that is, with an issue of function, of service, of how you do this or that, and then go back to basic principles, wherever you can find them, to shed light on whatever it is.

Neuhaus, I think, implicitly concedes that the danger of recidivism, and not the doctrine of redemption, is the real issue when he acknowledges the need to argue that «there is not a scintilla of evidence that a person who did a stupidly wicked thing many years ago and is repentant and has rendered decades of faithful service without a hint of suspicion poses any threat whatever to children.»

«Whatever the theological issues that churches have, they're all agreed that everybody is made equal in the sight of God,» he added.

And whatever «form» of church one attends (small group, house, small local body, mega-church) has some form of leadership (some good, some not - sThe biblical issue isn't, in my opinion, about whether women can teach in a church — it is the issue of qualifications for elders.

Sometimes those women who have initiated the idea will do so, throwing out for discussion whatever issues are of concern to them.

Whatever position one may take regarding future governance of cyberspace, it can not be denied that in any case (moral) choices have to be made and are being made since inevitably the proliferation of cyberspace technologies implies like all technological development a confrontation with moral issues on different levels.

This and similar definitions of «ethics» which leave the matter in the simple world of pragmatism and «science» (whatever she means by that) we still have language which can not automatically release us from the issue of eugenics.