Sentences with phrase «whatever knowledge we claim»

Because the world and its people are plural, whatever knowledge we claim is pluralistic — some even call it relativistic.

Not exact matches

The logic of knowing tells us that we must abandon any claim to have complete knowledge of whatever it is we have taken as fully real.

In fact, if Hartshorne's solution can be said to surpass theirs in its explicitly psychicalist claim that God is somehow experienced not only by every human being but by every actual entity whatever, theirs can be said to go beyond his in its more fully elaborated metaphysics of knowledge or cognitional theory.

The only logical choice for one claiming that there is no god is to be an agnostic (there is a possibility of a god but I have no knowledge for whatever reason).

But to claim any knowledge as truth beyond that, based on faith or whatever the case, is simply falling in line with the herd to be subservient.

There are only three possibilities in your case, Mr. MacMartin, either you are criminally negligent in your knowledge of the very profession in which you claim to be an expert, or you are visually challenged and can not see the blatant aerosol spraying that is so clearly visible in countless satellite images that you claim prove there is no aerosol spraying, or finally, yes, for whatever reason or motive, you are willfully choosing to deceive the population on this most critical issue, Mr. MacMartin.

They're the adults now who don't have any particular interest in science but «remember the science from school» and so unlikely to question whatever the AGW green agenda pushes, and even those in actual science fields where real knowledge of gas properties isn't relelevant, but what I find astonishing though, is how many in actual science fields who come together to discuss AGW continue to not question something as basic as the difference between heat and light claims in the AGW energy budget which is well known still in the real science world.

Seems to me many people who have little knowledge of climate science or substantive knowledge of actual impacts of warming (like the medical doctors worried about asthma) adopt as a default position to «do no harm»... IOW no matter the plausibility of the claimed harm, better to take whatever steps are suggested than to be possibly responsible for harm.

has a thorough working knowledge of settlement and trial law, so that whatever direction your Fosamax injury claim takes you can be sure that your attorney is going to be prepared and experienced enough to be able to deal with those developments The most important thing to highlight at this point is that the medical malpractice attorneys who work for Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. live up to all the necessary requirements highlighted in the four points above.