Use
whatever knowledge you have about them to imagine them putting on their shoes in the morning, getting to school, going through their day, leaving school at the end of the day, going home, and so on.
Our members are happy to share
whatever knowledge we have on providing companion animals with proper food, water, shelter and veterinary care to anyone who asks.
Whatever knowledge I have accumulated regarding my job, I will try to implement it in my job.
Not exact matches
The logic of knowing tells us that we must abandon any claim to
have complete
knowledge of
whatever it is we
have taken as fully real.
Our job, for both of us, is to make use of
whatever skills and
knowledge we
have to help each other make it out.
Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against
whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «
knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we
have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.
I pray that no matter our tool or method — fiction, theology, blogging, speaking, memoir, poetry,
whatever — that we
would walk in the
knowledge of the sacredness and purpose of our callings.
«I
have heard the speculation that Ambassador Johnson Cook was forced out of her job, but I
have no
knowledge of its veracity,» Thomas Farr, a longtime diplomat who served as the first director of the State Department's religious freedom office from 1999 to 2003, told CT. «
Whatever the reason for her departure, the vacancy provides a dramatic opportunity for the...
Fact is that you are free to believe
whatever you want, it doesn't really help for you to even try to understand the simple elegant FACT of evolution, besides you lack the skills,
knowledge, education, and understanding to contribute to fixing the problems that humankind will
have to fix in order to survive.
Now
whatever is capable of knowing certain things can not
have any of them in its own nature, for that which is present in it naturally
would impede the
knowledge of other things.
--
whatever a word of
knowledge has indicated.
Whatever knowledge of the gospel Africa
has, it
has acquired it by revolt, as a consequence of a conversion experience.
«but more profound scientific
knowledge will lead you a few of you to God», rather than being so positive about something you can't be positive about... especially since, I
would never be one of «God's followers, believers,
whatever», even if I saw him face to face and shook his hand.
For if, as both Thomas and Hartshorne hold, it is necessary that God know perfectly
whatever there is to know, and if there were no alternative possibilities as to what there is to know (whether by way of alternative possibilities for divine creativity or otherwise), then there
would be no possible alternatives to the actual state of
knowledge.
God accepts
whatever we bring to the God / person relationship — our physical and spiritual condition, personality, connection to reality, our participation in relationships, talents, inabilities, cognition,
knowledge, ignorance, life journey, spiritual journey, walk about, wandering, seeking, questioning, questing, acceptance of God, rejection of God — and our emotional and mental status: hate / love, anger / peace, sadness / happiness, hurt / health, feeling lost and abandoned / feeling found and included, agitation / serenity, apathy / passion, confusion / clarity, fractures / wholeness — all of this, all of whoever we are and
have ever been and every action committed or ever contemplated and every thought we ever explored or entertained or that flitted through our mind — all of this, we bring to the God / person relationship and God accepts the totality of who we are and every component that comprises who we are — as a gift.
The only logical choice for one claiming that there is no god is to be an agnostic (there is a possibility of a god but I
have no
knowledge for
whatever reason).
But we
have seen that
whatever Christians might
have thought in the past, we can no longer say that we actually possess a body of
knowledge which answers to this description, whether it be by revelation or by science.
Do we abuse
whatever it is that God
has given us — our position, our wealth (most of us are very wealthy compared to most of the people in the world), our
knowledge, or do we use it wisely?
This complacency, which Cobb acknowledges with his typical candor (supra), was being encouraged by Ford, albeit unconsciously, even before my use of the systematic approach
had produced a significantly new interpretation of Whitehead's metaphysics — one gleaned from all of Whitehead's books from The Principles of Natural
Knowledge to Modes of Thought, and one which,
whatever its merits are finally judged to be, constitutes a strong, thoroughly argued, and well - documented challenge to the whole range of traditional interpretations.
Perhaps evidence more compelling than what I
've read does exist... but regardless, we still
have firm evidence, based on all prior scientific
knowledge... that
whatever the truth is, about «creation» and everything else... is it is all logical, following natural law, even if its natural law we don't yet know.
I
have advocated that
whatever is valid concerning disclosures can be subsumed under the first rubric, since disclosures involve the interpretation of experience rather than the acquisition of self - authenticating
knowledge.
So there is truth in the ancient texts, and those texts show that the truth evolved based on human
knowledge evolving... and we know human
knowledge always
has it faults... but I refuse to believe more in Satan or
whatever evil power makes people afraid to advance our understandings....
â $ œYou
have no idea of where God is going to engineer your circumstances, no
knowledge of what strain is going to be put on you either at home or abroad, and if you waste your time in over-active energies instead of getting into soak on the great fundamental truths of Godâ $ ™ s Redemption, you will snap when the strain comes; but if this time of soaking before God is being spent in getting rooted and grounded in God on the unpractical line, you will remain true to Him
whatever happensâ $ (Oswald Chambers).
Whatever partial
knowledge we do
have in either mode does
have absolute value, does touch some real aspect of the world; for in the absolute we live and move and
have our being.
Having grown up in Christianity and experiencing firsthand some of its various iterations, i.e., Baptist, Presbyterian, and Methodist, and spending the effort reading up on others in an attempt to comprehend their core logic, it became apparent to even me, a young and
knowledge - seeking individual, that religion is nothing more than a man - made concept —
whatever flavor you subscribe to.
For
whatever reason, and I doubts its inside
knowledge, they are protecting themselves from
having to make massive payouts.
If they ever
had any valuable
knowledge of football management / administration they
would be employed by professional clubs rather than ranting daily on Justarsenal (I am certain, they
would earn loads of money and recognition from football than they currently do in
whatever employment they are in).
What you see is what you get from the whippet so no worries about him turning in to a tiger at some other club... Best sell him to China though to the best of my
knowledge whippets are not revered over there like tigers so will just
have to accept
whatever bog standard price we can get and invest in a quality attacking winger
Yes like 66.64 %, or
whatever percentage of the club Kroenke owns, the man who is entirely responsible for our current demise, by allowing AW to be a dictator, as there is no one on the board who
has sufficient footballing
knowledge to contradict him, AKA David Dein.
They will show tomorrow to the teams and we will agree
whatever the decision is because they
have all the power and all the
knowledge of how to do things.
Of course, this scene could
have taken place even with Carneiro in attendance, but for four seasons and over 200 matches, for
whatever reason — her
knowledge of the game, her awareness, her unique expertise — it
had not.
Having as much
knowledge and support as possible will increase your chances of getting through
whatever comes your way.
I love that we can make that choice and I also love that we
have a formal school system (one which I work in) that is there and available for everyone who can't make the choice you
have be it financial, lack of interest or
knowledge or
whatever.
It was people who
had little personal
knowledge of his research, who were the cause of
whatever problems he
had.
Compared with the control group, all school classes which worked with oral history accounts in
whatever form performed better: They exhibited a higher historical competence and
had more factual
knowledge.
The great thing about mental training is that it builds on top of
whatever knowledge you currently
have.
They
had no
knowledge of nutrition at all, they just ate
whatever was available, it wasn't about health and nutrition it was, eat
whatever you can find to survive.
I
'd say that you could still lose some weight, but I say that without any
knowledge of
whatever hells you
've afflicted upon yourself trying to kickstart the fat burning again.
Best - case scenario: Fanning delivers a typically excellent, emotionally expressive performance, shining a light on the transgender experience for folks whose
knowledge of the subject is limited to
whatever they
've read about Caitlyn Jenner.
Women
have been punished for being in power, for being powerful for many centuries and I thought that was the remarkable thing about making Prospero into Prospera... You can bring in that history of female struggle, and certainly in Shakespeare's day and for many centuries before and after women of
knowledge were punished for that
knowledge... We can see now in the extreme fundamentalist states,
whatever religion they are, that they want to exclude women from education... because an educated woman is a dangerous thing.
It's simply a matter of applying these skills and
knowledge and... this doesn't work for kids who don't fit in or
have disabilities or
whatever, whose behaviour we decide is unmanageable, they are moved out of the classroom so there's exclusion built into the manage - and - discipline model of behaviour.
Well, there are not many disadvantages of eLearning, the main one being that you get
knowledge only on a theoretical basis and when it comes to putting to use
whatever you
have learnt, it may be a little different.
You can use these to test their
knowledge of the previous lesson or topic, recap keywords, check understanding of a homework assignment, see what questions they still
have on a particular topic - or
whatever else you
would like to review!
In
whatever way Geography in the News is being used it
has been seen to engage students in Geography and improve their geographic
knowledge by taking them beyond the classroom.
«My curriculum
would be based on passion projects, aimed at gaining
knowledge and abilities, but also at discovering
whatever fires a student's heart,» writes Elisa Guerra Cruz (@ElisaGuerraCruz) in Mexico.
Whatever their impact on learning, these efforts appear not to
have dramatically altered the impression that U.S. schools, when compared to those of other countries, do not fully embrace inculcating
knowledge as the high school's primary institutional mission.»
Regardless of whether they're Common Core standards, or not, pretending that it isn't important to regularly assess and report on students» progress, in a consistent and comparable way, against
whatever standards states
have undermines their legitimacy and belittles the notion that it's important for students to master essential
knowledge and competencies.
Some kids learn faster, some kids already
had a basis for the
knowledge measured on the test (learned it at home, learned it last year), some kids weren't ready to take that course because or low reading levels, or
whatever.
They
have no pedagogical
knowledge, outside of
whatever they experienced as a student.
Since there's no way of knowing which students
have studied what, the idea is to cover a wide variety of topics, to balance out
whatever unfair advantages in background
knowledge some kids might
have.