As far as the conclusions and recommendations from child custody evaluations, they just make up
whatever they want based on their own personal beliefs and inherent personal biases, they then apply some
psychological constructs in entirely haphazard and idiosyncratic ways to justify
whatever biased and idiosyncratic conclusion was reached, and they usually take a middle - of - the road risk - management response of recommending the status quo with the addition of «reunification therapy» and an admonishment to both parents that the degree of parental conflict is
harming the child and that the parents need to co-parent better.