Blending close up tracking shots with CGI kites, these sequences are not only out of place, they subvert
whatever symbolic meaning the kites had to the story.
The way the question is currently written, one could either interpret it as any case where a party first got a small number of seats in one election and was then able to increase their share significantly in the next (by
whatever means), or it could be interpreted as just covering the technique of using
symbolic gifts to provoke their opponents.