Sentences with phrase «when ffp»

Not exact matches

If you believe that all the money in the game means that there will always be ways of bending and breaking the rules then I guess the FFP thing was never going to work and when you see what has happened this week in the transfer market, with PSG paying something like # 200 million to sign Neymar from FC Barcelona then you could say that anything is possible.

«When Manchester City pays off 50 millions of fine because they exceeded the FFP, I think it's unfair.

With the easing on the FFP overspending rules by UEFA coming into effect when it does come.

I laughed yesterday when I read Mourhinho saying that City should have had their PL title taken away because they breached ffp!

NNAAAA sory mate apart from top Spanish clubs who gets huge share of the TV money and Monocco who is tax free there are no excuse for any teams following FFP rules as we found out when it come in to force last summer.

I doubt Milan will have money for Ibra, but thats what happens when Fifa shuts down FFP, damn we wont have any striker left if we continue like this

When you consider that in the past decade we have competed yet still built a stadium and stayed within our means, it will now be very interesting to see what happens to those teams that want to build new stadiums but stay within the FFP constraints and buy new players.

My question is when the heck are the FFP rules actually going to kick in?

It is not down to Arsenal just to buy a player... the selling club has to a) want to sell b) agree a price and c) ensure they have someone else to replace who they are selling Additionally because of FFP and Home - Grown rules it does nt make sense to buy all your players and then suddenly you could get 2 - 3 major injuries and have to buy someone else but then cant because you have no monies or might have to sell someone to be able to do so So many people saying negative things and that we should just go and buy and yet at the same time why spend so much on someone when we could have got somebody else!

Buying the league is the worst thing they can do because when VanGaal leaves they will have to rebuild from scratch and spend another 100m, FFP won't allow it to happen like they're currently doing with Man City

PSG didn't spend 400 mill on 2 players couldn't afford Mbappé that's the reason for the loan, so Pep is still talking shit.What I've read whether true or not, PSG will have to sell players to sign Mbappé to avoid FFP violations.As i said yesterday this is what i can't get my head around why City can keep spending when revenue to expenditure simply doesn't add up.

It is a bluff, either to increase his price further, or also, when you consider that ManU, Chelsea, ManCity have a need for a creative midfielder NOW, not next year, and that the FFP means that this year might be the last where huge transfers and wages are paid, then Nasri may not find himself such willing and eager suitors next year.

Amos is quite right that we will not be maintaining the same scale of spending but one of the reasons we've had to do that level of spending over the last few years is to ensure we met FFP when it came in.

What I do know is that FFP follows International Accountancy Standard 24 (IAS 24) when determining what does and does not constitute a related party transaction and it's been explained time and time again to opposition fans that Etihad is not a related party under IAS 24 despite clueless keyboard warriors claiming otherwise.

That's a point I alluded to earlier Amos — some people are quick to jump on our net spend in the current financial year and arrive at the conclusion that we're riding roughshod over FFP but when the cost of these players and wages is amortised over the length of their contracts, coupled with removing high earners (Tevez being the main one) from our books then it's entirely conceivable as to why we've spent # 80m - # 90m net without it jeopardising our chances of meeting FFP.

FFP is the rules of the game, which Platini, when not doing his utmost for the French national team should be concentrating on enforcing.

Indeed I guess it was this that Jose Mourinho was thinking about when he stated that some clubs are dealing with FFP «in a dodgy way».

That is something Roma failed to do last year when they were slapped with a # 4.3 million fine for «non-compliance of FFP break - even regulations»

UEFA's FFP verdicts are expected in early June at the earliest, and PSG do not expect a decision to be communicated when they travel to the meeting in a few weeks» time.

How do clubs with massive debts escape attention, when the so - called intention of FFP was to stop clubs getting into financial difficulties?

Why do Madrid want Wenger, well maybe they have realised they need to create their own, FFP round the corner and a string of managers only interested in what happens when they are in charge.

By the same token, members of the other Star Alliance FFPs will be granted the same benefits when travelling on Avianca Brazil.