At least in my car
when the MAF sensor got dirty it would idle very roughly while being perfectly smooth when moving.
Not exact matches
When I was told
MAF could help... it was great news for us.»
Mean FST and RND were significantly higher within 5 Mb of centromeres (FST
MAF > 10 % = 0.246; RND = 0.228)
when compared to the remainder of the genome (FST
MAF > 10 % = 0.164; RND = 0.213; Mann - Whitney U test, P < 0.05 for both tests).
The progress is quite good, I used to run around 8:20
MAF pace
when started and now run 6:55 mile pace at my
MAF effort on the track.
I am also a fitness instructor so do have about 2 - 4 workouts (mostly weights) each week at the gym that my HR is well over my 138
MAF and even while I cycle (something I changed to this fall to help with the stress on my adrenals from running) takes me over that effort
when I am not working very hard.
You have quite a fast
MAF pace so I'd say it's possible you have an aerobic base that's relatively powerful
when compared to your total muscle power.
Some days
when training, my HR is bang on within
MAF (127 - 133 bpm).
So if I'm going to do a
MAF test
when I know it's going to be hot out I will only do it in the early morning hours otherwise the data would be skewed.
I know
when I run in the heat I have to slow down to keep my heart rate at
MAF.
Also,
when you talk being about 20 % anaerobic / 80 % aerobic, are you talking about percentage of time over / below
MAF while running?
My question is 2-fold: Firstly, I» m assuming it's fine for my HR to go below
MAF, such as
when I'm riding my bike on a downhill and can't apply enough force to keep my HR in the
MAF range, but wondered if these cyclic decreases interfere with fitness gains of the aerobic training.
So, while working out a variety of muscles and movements below the
MAF HR will help you develop and maintain strength and aerobic endurance in the muscles and movements you are training, you won't be working out the kind of «muscle endurance» that is typically meant
when CSCS types say «muscle endurance.»
To have one - single - official -
MAF - HR is an exception and / or it will happen every time
when the engine (the muscles» power) is stronger than the fuel system.
I understand that
MAF means the max of aerobic engine — just
when is about to start the anaerobic engine.
When I run under my
MAF, I do not experience any of the stress on my lungs.
I'm also trying to run at
MAF heart rate,
when not doing speed training.
When I first started, I could maintain my
MAF HR of 126 - 135 bpm by walking fast, now I have to run to maintain it and am finding i can even pick up my pace a bit and keep the HR in the zone.
However,
when I try to run my heart rate rapidly exceeds my
MAF (as has been discussed extensively).
The
MAF heart rate is
when your aerobic system will develop the fastest.
Or
when the heart rate increases above
MAF HR?
Surely
when it comes to racing (and lets say after years of
MAF training) one doesn't run at the
MAF level (138 for me)?
And even
when I don't get up to my
MAF, I let it happen.
I am eating breakfast while doing the 2 week detox because I want to do it the way you recommend, but was wondering what your thoughts on IF were
when used in conjunction with the
MAF method, because I'd like to go back to it once the detox is over (in a few days).
2)
When planning workouts according to 80/20
MAF / High - intensity, should that be high intensity at 20 % of the total time spent working out, or should it be no more than a 4:1 ratio of time spent at
MAF to time spent doing high - intensity?
I am, however, looking forward to an improved
MAF score
when I try again in a couple weeks!
One of the key issues that we have not addressed satisfactorily is
when to train at or under the
MAF HR.
But
when there are very few sugars in the tank, your
MAF pace represents only the amount of fats you consume — so it's slower.
From personal experience, my speed / paces (at
MAF HR and below) were the best
when I was on a high carb, low fat diet.
Also
when should I do my second
MAF test?
When properly performed, the
MAF Test is the most important evaluation an athlete can make to assess overtraining in its earliest stage.
The hay fever is affecting my heart rate, especially
when training, to the point that it takes very very little to get to the
MAF target of 180 — age.
I've been measuring my heart rate to see what it's like throughout the day and it's unremarkable except that
when I take a shower my heart rate reaches about 160 for 5 - 10 minutes (
MAF HR 140).
Even though it told me my
MAF score was poor, I liked it and am excited for
when it is fully released on the app store.
Because I should be able to match my old
MAF wattage
when I'm fat adapted, right?
Now
when it comes to racing are you suggesting that it is best to keep at
MAF heart rate for a race?
Prior to the test I was doing
MAF training (
MAF HR = 120) 4 times a week except for once a week
when I would do a club tempo run.
However,
when I was eating a standard diet (a mixture of carbs / fats), my
MAF / aerobic ability was really bad, my breathing felt off, my muscles felt tired etc., like my blood / oxygen weren't efficient.
But I have, on all but one occasion, reverted to walking
when HR spikes over
MAF happen during «running».
During my investigating i noticed the check engine light didn't come on
when i unplugged the
MAF, and it was also coated in engine oil which had leaked all the way down into my air filter from a gummed up pcv so now im under the conclusion i prolly need a new
MAF sensor AND a throttle body... ouch!
I checked the
MAF data on the scanner, and it seems correct (6 grams / second at idle and rises
when I hit the gas).
So just
when i was ready to give in and buy a new TB and
MAF sensor i got a text from a friend who i questioned about my issue.
The second reason is
when the BOV vents boost pressure, that air has already been metered through the
MAF.
Beyond the
MAF sensor, in most cases, an engine that stumbles
when it's cold is caused by one of three different components: clogged fuel injectors, a dirty throttle body, or an EGR valve that is damaged or also...
The P0101 trouble code may keep returning if the engine computer does not see the
MAF sensor input within a specified range
when it is testing the
MAF input.
I believe it's a sensor just don't know which one and if the car ran better
when I emmidietly put in
MAF sensor new, but shortly after it returned to running rough.
When it comes to
MAF sensors, communication with the ECM is key.