The analyst must be objective, because
when authors read their own work their minds will add missing words and letters due to familiarity, creating not only typos, but sometimes gaps in the story itself.
The analyst must be objective, because
when authors read their own work their minds will add missing words or letters, creating not only typos but sometimes gaps in the story itself.
I like
when an author reads his / her own books, though sometimes s / he has an awful voice, which is a let down.
Not exact matches
The problem gets even worse
when you
read a number of articles by the same
author.
If you're unsure about what your goal for the book is,
read this piece about the mistakes that
authors make
when framing the results they are looking for, and how to better frame.
Out of 2,000 negotiations videotaped by Gerard I. Nierenberg and Henry H. Calero, the
authors of «How to
Read a Person Like a Book,» there wasn't a single settlement
when one of the negotiators had their legs crossed.
As I recall the headline
read, more or less, «Women Don't Negotiate Because They're Not Dumb,» and the
author went on to cite research to make her point that
when women do ask for more money, people tend to hate it, and «pushy» women end up paying mightily in terms of career progression and opportunities.
A timely choice from The Life Project
author Helen Pearson: «
Reading or rereading this book should be compulsory,
when so many of the issues it touches on — manipulated news, unwanted surveillance — are highly resonant today.»
When I
read the headline of this article on RealClear Politics, I thought the
authors were making a familiar conservative case — that Barack Obama's learning curve in the Oval Office is impossibly steep, that he was (and remains) underqualified for the job.
The majority of the books I
read are not Christian, so
when I come across a Christian
author, I'm usually pretty excited.
For example, the
author had already explained occasions
when the altar is incensed and the significance of the congregation's postures: sitting, for example, to «listen attentively,» and standing «out of respect»
when the Gospel is
read.
When we read a letter or book, it is written word by word, line by line, chapter by chapter and when we get to the end, we hope to have the meaning that the author intended us to h
When we
read a letter or book, it is written word by word, line by line, chapter by chapter and
when we get to the end, we hope to have the meaning that the author intended us to h
when we get to the end, we hope to have the meaning that the
author intended us to have.
I remember
when I started seeing books from Emergent
authors being
read.
Hays also seems narrow
when he encourages readers to
read the OT principally as narrative and not as a «source of oracles, prooftexts, or halakhic regulations,» apparently disqualifying many early Christian
authors who cited Scripture in this way.
To
read the bible «literally» is to
read the bible as the
authors of a given book or letter intended it
when it was written.
When you
read in the Bible about proclaiming Jesus as Lord, following Jesus, taking up your cross, eternal reward, inheriting the Kingdom, life in the Spirit, faithful living, and on and on and on, the
author who wrote that text was primarily thinking of how we should live as followers of Jesus so that we can experience the life God meant for us to live.
Maybe the Holy Spirit is at work around the world to bring multiple
authors and pastors and theologians to similar ideas about similar things all at once, and so
when I
read something in someone else's book that sounds a lot like something I have written, but they don't give me credit, it is not that they «borrowed» from me, but because both of us were listening to what the Spirit has been whispering to minds all over the world.
I should have known to not bother
reading the article
when I
read that the
author lives in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Chicago, its funny how the left HATES Christianity until it they need another ally to push their twisted agenda.
I would like to point out the fact that (and I'm sure if you have actually
read the Bible you saw this) that each of the
authors were «Filled with the Holy Ghost»
when they wrote the Gospels.
But
when the Rev. Paul F.M. Zahl
read several of King's novels, he learned something new about the
author: There's a lot of faith behind his fright.
When I was asked to sign the Appeal critiquing Paragraph 137, I initially agreed with the
reading of the
authors of the Appeal — but as I studied the paragraph more carefully, it became clear to me that it could be
read in a much more benign fashion, and that the benign
reading is the correct....
Each year
when it is
read I can hardly conceal a smile as the
author lists (and not just once) the titles of the king's advisors — the satraps, prefects, governors, counselors, treasurers, justices, magistrates, and officials of the provinces — or as he takes delight (again not just once) in naming the musical instruments that called people to worship the golden statue — the sound of the horn, pipe, lyre, trigon, harp, drum, and the entire musical ensemble.
When we
read such proclamations of the intellect bent on showing the existential conditions of absolutely everything, we feel — quite apart from our legitimate impatience at the somewhat ridiculous swagger of the program, in view of what the
authors are actually able to perform — menaced and negated in the springs of our innermost life.
The whole thing rests upon one
author — Michael Prescott's — highly selective excerpting and chopping up of a private [i.e., thinking out loud without clarifications] journal written
when Rand was barely out of her teens, fresh from the blood bath of 1920s Soviet Russia — and still made it very clear that her
read on the personalities of the observers showed that they were not appalled by Hickman's crime — she said there had been far worse, without the same spectacle of glee — but by his flamboyant and mocking defiance of society.
However,
when reading it, on several of the days it seems that instead of «
reading them in light of the Resurrection of our Lord» the
author is undermining a traditional
reading of Scripture.
When I was asked to sign the Appeal critiquing Paragraph 137, I initially agreed with the
reading of the
authors of the Appeal — but as I studied the paragraph more carefully, it became clear to me that it could be
read in a much more benign fashion, and that the benign
reading is the correct one.
Instead of
reading them through as if they were a continous narrative, I
read them in parellel — and
when you do — and allow each
author speak for themselves, they are often saying very different things.
Their chosen quote, and I hope you can
read it with as much incredulous merriment as I did, «
When the intellectual
authors of the modern right created its doctrines in the 1950s, they drew on nineteenth - century political thought, borrowing explicitly from the great apologists for slavery, above all, the intellectually fierce South Carolinian John C. Calhoun.»
Blessed are the Cheesemakers
When you
read the Bible flood story keep in mind the
author and the audience.
When we
read about Paul struggling mightily so that Christians in small churches will learn to live in Christian harmony, perhaps we see an alternative vision of church — one in which all the theological muscle of the
author of Philippians is marshaled merely to get Euodia and Syntyche to get along (Phil.
Too often we bring our own biases to the text / argument and what we
read in is, «Well, I always knew that he thought that, and this proves it,»
when really that's not what the
author intended at all.
These led me to his earlier works, which consistently vindicated Kass's self - description in his justly acclaimed Towards a More Natural Science: «The
author of this book is by
reading a moralist, by education a generalist, by training a physician and biochemist, by vocation a teacher» and student» of philosophical texts, and by choice a lover of serious conversations, who thinks best
when sharing thoughts and speeches with another.»
The imagnination will certainly fool you and the devil is the
author of confusion so perhaps
when and if the
author can get enlightened and stop looking for loopholes in God's word and
reads it spiritually then she won't be confused anymore.
The article, in which the
author tries Gwyneth's elimination diet and ends up with a rash on her face, is one of the funnier things I have ever
read, and therefore, I wanted to share it with my mom
when I met her for dinner one night last May.
When i
read this article, am wondering if the
author has ever watched a football game or he just loves to
read the newspapers!
There is no site like this in my country and I was very grateful to the
author of this one because I learnt a lot and finally found someone who feels like me...
When I first
read all these comments I cried as if I found a good friend who understands me... I do something which has always been very natural and still is to mammals in this world and please, if you disagree, do not criticize us and do not jump to conclusions because it hurts...
If you haven't
read any books by the
author Claire Freedman and illustrated by Ben Corts then we really recommend that you do in Dinosaurs Love Underpants one of the popular «Love Underpants» series of books there is a great time with the bunch of dinosaurs that just love wearing underpants even
when they are quite itchy!
I was delighted
when children's
author Maria Ashworth got in touch asking if Leo and I would like to have a
read of her new story, My Big Tree.
As a first time
author, my heart sang
when I
read her review because I was so thrilled that I could positively affect someone who I haven't even met.
Okay, I finished the posts, and as always have one more thing to say.One thing that bugs me
when I
read parenting books is
when the
author eludes to the fact that it needs to be one way or the other.
«
When Success Leads to Failure,» The Atlantic «The Gift of Failure,» New York Times «If Your Kid Left His Term Paper At Home, Don't Bring It To Him» New York Magazine «Books That Changed My Mind This Year,» Fortune «New Book Suggests Parents Learn to Let Kids Fail,» USA Today «7 Rules for Raising Self - Reliant Children,» Forbes «Before You Let Your Child Fail,
Read This,» Huffington Post «How Schools Are Handling an Overparenting Crisis,» NPR «Why Failure Hits Girls So Hard,» Time «The Value of a Mess,» Slate «4 Reasons Why Every Educator Should
Read «The Gift of Failure,»» Inside Higher Ed «Why We Should Let Our Children Fail,» The Guardian (UK) «Shelly's Bookworms: The Gift of Failure,» WFAA Dallas «Why I Don't Want My Kids to be Lazy Like Me,» Yahoo Parenting «Jessica Lahey,» Celia Walden for The Telegraph (UK) «How to To Give Your Child The Gift of Failure,» Huffington Post «The Gift of Failure,» Doug Fabrizio, Radio West «In the
Author's Voice: The Gift of Failure,» WISU / NPR «The Gift of Failure,» The Good Life Project «Giving Our Children the Gift of Failure,» ScaryMommy «Lyme Resident's Book Challenges Parents and Kids on Failure,» Valley News «The Gift of Failure,» The Jewish Press
Author ReShonda Tate Billingsly made The Huffington Post news
when she posted to Facebook a picture of her daughter posing with a hand written sign that
read, «Since I want to post photos of me holding liquor I am obviously not ready for social media and will be taking a hiatus until I learn what I should + should not post.
He's also the
author of a new book, Born Round, in which he chronicles his deeply troubled past
when it comes to food, including a history of chronic overeating and... [Continue
reading]
We
read two books, one book called «Unassisted Childbirth» by Laura Shamley which she kind of like guru on the topic, and then there is another book called «Emergency Childbirth», just forgot the
author but, it's really short, it's like what they give paramedics learn about delivering a baby you know and this thing like
when things go wrong and what to do.
When my mom was here after El Chico was born, she was
reading my copy of a popular parenting book by a different
author.
Ann Douglas,
author of The Mother of All Baby Books: The Ultimate Guide to Your Baby's First Year, answers: «You are wise to
read between the lines
when it comes to your son's behavior.
When we
read of Churchill as a «showman» and «an extrovert» who wrote with a «rollicking readability», one detects a wink and a nod to the
author's own qualities.
I was older than most
when I
read Lavinia Derwent (Elizabeth Dodd), an
author with a wonderful imagination that simply captivates children.
Sadly, some people can't seem to put partisan instincts to one side — as this report commissioned by the Yes campaign just before Christmas showed - you may also like to
read this blog from the very same
author who, a year ago, wisely said: «At a time of economic crisis,
when people are calling for clear leadership and direction, it would be foolish to abolish a [voting] system that carries out these functions.»
When first going through this book, I wasn't sure if it was going to be a get rich quick (and make me rich in the process) scheme from the
author, but it turned out to be quite an informative
read and I am glad that I stumbled upon it.