Sentences with phrase «when challenged in a court»

As discussed in a subsequent post, when challenged in a court of law, some of those who have made repeated claims that he has been engaged in fraud and scientific misconduct won't even stand behind their own allegations.

As discussed in a subsequent post, when challenged in a court of law, some of those who have made repeated claims that he has been engaged in fraud and scientific misconduct won't even stand behind their own allegations.

Personally I think HB2 will be overturned when challenged in the courts.

Not exact matches

Gay marriage has been legal in Indiana since last October, when the Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge to a federal appeals court ruCourt declined to take up a challenge to a federal appeals court rucourt ruling.

Toshiba «s announcement came as its Westinghouse Electric Company subsidiary is engaged in a legal and accounting row with CB&I, which has argued in court that it expected a relatively small payment from Westinghouse of only $ 161 million when the deal closed on the understanding that the latter was taking on a challenged business.

SGM evoked a religious freedom defense in 2013 when the confidentiality of its pastoral counseling was challenged, stating, «SGM believes that allowing courts to second - guess pastoral guidance would represent a blow to the First Amendment that would hinder, not help, families seeking spiritual direction among other resources in dealing with the trauma related to any sin including child sexual abuse.»

Amnesty noted that when organizations have challenged the Indian government on its actions under FCRA, «the courts have generally ruled in their favor.»

There has always been some tension between the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise protections of the First Amendment, but the Supreme Court, when considering a similar challenge to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act in 2005 — wherein the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that granting protections to religious prisoners amounted to a violation of the Establishment Clause — ruled that alleviating a state - imposed substantial burden on religious practice did not violate the Establishment Clause.

[Editor's Note: In light of today's ruling from the Supreme Court that found the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional, here's an article we ran back when the DOMA's first challenges were heard.

Regulations successfully defended in 2007 when challenged by the pharmaceutical industry at the Supreme Court regulate the promotion of foods for infants and young children up to three years of age as health officials attempt to prevent thousands of unnecessary deaths occurring every year.

When the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 was challenged in court, it was determined to be legal.

After failing to use his surrogates to block Dr. Zanetor Rawlings, daughter of NDC founder, from leading the constituency, Nii Armah Ashitey, after losing to Dr. Zanetor, officially showed how battle ready he was when he filed a case in court, challenging the selection of the medical trained daughter of former President Rawlings.

not do primary according to law which the court said no it is wrong of them to have challenged the primary of APC but in a situation of this nature when that thing happened in 2014/2015 and the National legal adviser insisted that constitution be followed, why in 2017 we are now doing it contrary to the constitution again?

They should now pause and reflect on how much money defending legal challenges in the High Court will cost, especially when, as academies, they will have no local authority to bail them out.»

Democrats who back the Affordable Care Act — known as Obamacare pejoratively — point to the multiple tests the law has withstood: It was approved legislatively in 2010 when Democrats controlled both chambers, withstood a Supreme Court challenge (which, in simplistic terms, Chief Justice John Roberts determined the individual mandate is a «tax») and then it survived the ultimate referendum, President Obama's re-election.

Opponents challenged the plan in three suits, combined when the case went to the United States Supreme Court in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry (2006).

In his response, the EFCC's lawyer, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, said Usman's application for leave to travel could not be heard when there were pending applications challenging the court's jurisdiction.

Coming hot on the heels of the row about whether Ed Miliband's populist energy price freeze pledge would drive away overseas investment in the UK, these tensions show the challenge Britain's politicians face when trying to court voters, the popular press and businesses at the same time.

On October 19, 2017 when the EFCC's ex parte motion was scheduled to be heard by Justice Nnamdi Dimgba, Mrs. Jonathan's lawyers appeared in court, insisting that the commission's motion could not be heard in view of their application already filed to challenge the court's jurisdiction.

That challenge lingered in the court system well after the freeze was lifted in 2007 and was not resolved until 2013 when a federal judge ruled not only was the freeze justified, but that the district did not need to give teachers credit on the pay scale for the years the freeze was enacted.

In 2010, when there were lengthy ballot challenges after the election, Cuomo urged the state's chief judge to expedite court action in order to have the races decided by the end of the yeaIn 2010, when there were lengthy ballot challenges after the election, Cuomo urged the state's chief judge to expedite court action in order to have the races decided by the end of the yeain order to have the races decided by the end of the year.

The NYPD spent more than $ 25 million on what de Blasio called the «unprecedented security challenge» of protecting Trump in the weeks after the election — when he held court in his penthouse apartment on Fifth Avenue, and where his wife and youngest son still live — and had been seeking federal reimbursement.

The commission's investigation into lawmakers» outside income was stymied when the legislators and their employers challenged the subpoenas in court.

Mr. Addison, who was one f the lead lawyers when the NPP challenged the ooutcome of the 2012 presidential elections in the Supreme Court, defeated Nii Noi Nortey in the NPP's parliamentary primary held prior to the 2016 general elections in a rather controversial manner.

The law was stayed in a federal court following multiple legal challenges, including one brought by now - U.S. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt when he was Oklahoma attorney general.

When he challenged the Obama rule in court as Oklahoma's attorney general, Pruitt was one of the leading voices for the legal argument that EPA can't regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants because it already has a standard for mercury and air toxics emission from generators — known as the 112 exclusion, referring to a section of the Clean Air Act.

Battle of the Sexes tells the story of Billie Jean King (Emma Stone) and Bobby Riggs (Steve Carell) when in 1973, they battled it out on the tennis court after Riggs challenged any woman to a match, with the intention to prove women did not belong on the court.

But his standing in the royal court is challenged when he refuses to give his support to the King who is petitioning for a divorce in the Catholic Church.

When the Supreme Court justice challenged every person to demonstrate the benefits of diversity in the classroom, Lee realized that he could do more.

When the Cleveland program was challenged in court later that year, John Walton personally helped bankroll the defense.

Louisiana's voucher program suffered an additional challenge in May when, in an unrelated case, the Supreme Court of Louisiana upheld a lower court's ruling that the voucher program violates the state's constitution by illegally diverting money earmarked for public schools to private and religious institutCourt of Louisiana upheld a lower court's ruling that the voucher program violates the state's constitution by illegally diverting money earmarked for public schools to private and religious institutcourt's ruling that the voucher program violates the state's constitution by illegally diverting money earmarked for public schools to private and religious institutions.

In denying a similar challenge to an advance fee ban in the TSR for certain offers of credit, a federal court found that it merely regulated «when payment may be collected» and did not impair the sale of educational materials produced by the companIn denying a similar challenge to an advance fee ban in the TSR for certain offers of credit, a federal court found that it merely regulated «when payment may be collected» and did not impair the sale of educational materials produced by the companin the TSR for certain offers of credit, a federal court found that it merely regulated «when payment may be collected» and did not impair the sale of educational materials produced by the company.

«So far, when we have been challenged on environmental standards we have had a good record in court.

The Surfrider Foundation won an important victory on June 17th when the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled (with Justice Stevens abstaining) in Florida Department of Environmental Protection v. Stop the Beach Renourishment to reject the challenge by private homeowners, uphold the constitutionality of Florida's beach management program, and hold that the beach belongs to the public after beach renourishment has occurred.

When the DC appeals court ruled that the EPA had the authority to regulate greenhouse gases on June 26, 2012, it brought to a close a process of regulation and court challenges that started in 1999.

The situation was compounded when First Energy filed a court challenge to PJM's use of demand response in capacity markets as well.

When EPA uses the SCC as part of a Clean Air Act rulemaking, those regulations can only be challenged in the appropriate federal appellate court.

Article V (1)(c) is the only article in the Convention which expressly states that courts may partially enforce an award when there are grounds for refusing to recognize or enforce some aspects of the award.834 Courts have referred to the principle for partial enforcement expressed in article V (1)(c) to partially enforce awards in connection with challenges brought under other provisions of the Convecourts may partially enforce an award when there are grounds for refusing to recognize or enforce some aspects of the award.834 Courts have referred to the principle for partial enforcement expressed in article V (1)(c) to partially enforce awards in connection with challenges brought under other provisions of the ConveCourts have referred to the principle for partial enforcement expressed in article V (1)(c) to partially enforce awards in connection with challenges brought under other provisions of the Convention.

After a long, challenging legal battle, the B.C. Supreme Court found that the B.C. Government unjustifiably breached teachers constitutionally protected freedom of association when it stripped class size and composition provisions and other provisions governing teacher working conditions and prohibited bargaining on those subject matters in the future.

The OCA ruling, handed down in December and which upheld a 2016 Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision, illustrates the challenges that can arise when estate issues erupt while a client is experiencing mental impairment.

The elected officials plan was struck down in 1998 by the Federal courts when Justice of the Peace Phillip O'Neill and other elected officials challenged the law.

Another aspect that we can point to as a challenge is the change of understanding in our Supreme Court regarding when a convicted person must start serving their sentences.

If the defendant wishes to challenge jurisdiction, this must be done in the original court and not later when the decision is brought for enforcement.

However, Dr Sanchez - Graells argues that when the case reaches the Supreme Court on appeal «[e] ven if the parties do not challenge or even raise to the UKSC's consideration the matter of the (ir) reversibility of an Article 50 notification, it is a logical given that the UKSC needs to take a stance on this point in order to be able to rule on the case».

Those dates were later cancelled, however, when Landry, who is notorious in Quebec legal circles for several run - ins with the Quebec Bar and a defamation suit against Court of Quebec Judge James Rondeau, announced his intention to file a Charter challenge to Judge Roy's ruling on behalf of his client.

This comprehensive analysis discusses the challenges when applying such a principle in the EU context and concludes that the CJEU has positively contributed to transforming ne bis in idem from a traditional principle of procedure to a fundamental right with the result of influencing the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.

When the New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission decided unilaterally to place its executive director David Potter on indefinite paid suspension, the employee challenged the decision in court.

We regularly appear before the Courts when interim measures are sought, such as the appointment of arbitrators, the challenge of arbitrators, or the stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration, and on the enforcement of arbitration awards in Ontario and Canada.

This would be a means of recognizing in our most fundamental law that Quebec existed in our country as a distinctive part of it with unique needs in such matters as language and culture and that courts would need to take the existence of this «distinct society» into account when analyzing provisions under constitutional challenge.

It is anticipated that the new law will provide a properly structured procedural framework for domestic and international arbitrations seated in the UAE, with clear rules on when an award may be challenged, as well as easing the route to enforcement of awards by giving arbitration awards the status of court judgment which can be ratified in the UAE Courts (thereby avoiding lengthy enforcement proceedings).