Sentences with phrase «when claims»

Walton argues that an ad hominem is valid when the claims made about a person's character or actions are relevant to the conclusions being drawn.

Mr Clegg has conceded that «women had been let down» after the independent report said he should have «asked more questions» when the claims — which Lord Rennard denies — arose five years ago.

«The fact that, under this code, grammar schools can increase pupil numbers without any requirement to consult, demonstrates the Government is deceiving the public when it claims it is not expanding the selective grammar school system.

Mr Shapps said publishing the report would «clear the air» after Mr Miliband accused the union of malpractice when the claims first emerged.

Put simply my statement which the academic economist found objectionable was that multiple and wildly divergent foreign exchange rates and unclear economic policy were a deterrent to foreign direct investment in 2016, which he disputed contending that in spite of those conditions, Nigeria could still «attract» significant foreign direct investment in support of which he offered two illustrations - a purported 1994 investment in Nigeria LNG when he claims a dual exchange rate system existed and the recent Eurobond fund raising.

This month, in the very week when claims of abuse in football dominated national news headlines, the Home Office published their key policy document which described how service commissioners should provide for men and boys who are victims of sexual violence, domestic abuse and other intimate crimes.

They argue — as Corbyn does when he claims credit for U-turns the government has performed, such as over benefit reform or economic policy — that in holding to the faith they have exercised power, because power is simply the ability to make or to prevent things happening.

Usually when claims are successful, the member will recover all their legal costs from the other party.

It's only March but when claims like this crop up, it's a reminder that the madness of the summer transfer window is only a couple of months away!

When the claims started on Saturday, we got the actual newspaper rather than relying on the online teaser version, and explained: «A claim from Italian newspaper La Stampa has caused a bit of fuss on Saturday.

He was raised religious and he became religious once again, with only a brief period in between when he claims that he was an atheist, yet I've never seen any of his arguments against God stemming from this period.

We must agree with Ivan Illich when he claims that a society's understanding of death also controls its understanding of health.

This was mostly meant to be towards all camps of thought because I'm just a bit frustrated being caught in between all these different thoughts and interpretations and not knowing which one to believe, especially when the claims are bold.

Arthur Hertzberg is right when he claims that the privilege of nationalism is proper and necessary for Jews, but he errs egregiously when he substitutes the charge of anti-Semitism for an explanation of Israeli complicity in oppressive policies.

Klemke is consistent when he claims, therefore, that the universe is purposeless.

And what does he mean when he claims that «reflection, when pursued to the end, leads to a living mysticism, which is a necessary element of thought»?

Nor is Ford reporting a fact when he claims that White - head decided to publish large amounts of writings conveying abandoned or superseded positions side by side with newer writings conveying his later or more mature views.

Clearly, we have to take Whitehead seriously when he claims to be in agreement with Descartes in placing subjectivity at the core of his metaphysics.

The man called jesus has nothing to do with god besides when he spoke about the dude... his message was one of love and compassion... nothing to worship there just a good man with a good message — then when he claims to know things about the afterlife and so called kingdom of heaven all come from eastern beliefs dating from 500 to 600 years before jesus was said to have lived.

But even they show that the contrary is the case, as Altizer himself demonstrates when he claims that he is talking about the absolute immanence or «presence - in - this - world» of the Word or Spirit, in consequence of the radical kenosis or self - emptying of the transcendent deity usually denoted by the word «God».

you said: «Knowing that the mantra of many non theists is» verifiable proof» it seems the burden of proof is on them / you when claims of» it will vanish when you die.»

Feel free to list away, don't be overly hurt though when your claims are further debunked.

Knowing that the mantra of many non theists is» verifiable proof» it seems the burden of proof is on them / you when claims of» it will vanish when you die.»

The scourge of God who mocks God's will is still speaking the truth when he claims to be the scourge of God.

Another aspect, as in Freud and Marx, is the insight that reason is dishonest when it claims mastery over nature.

When his claims aren't tripped - out fantasies, they're almost always buried under several encrustations of «One might think A» and «I'm inclined to be skeptical of B» and «On the other hand C, but on the other other hand D, and there are 22 letters of the alphabet to go so get comfortable.»

The theme, often struck by Reinhold Niebuhr, that a proximate cause becomes demonic when it claims ultimate significance, is one which Harrington picks up with enthusiasm.

It is the medical field in which the Protestant church can be heard most decisively by the society as a whole when it claims that its ministries complement China's drive for scientific and technical advancement.

Maybe Hauerwas is right when he claims that «Niebuhr's god is not a god capable of offering salvation in any material sense.

Obviously the German mass media try to create an atmosphere like this: Everybody, who criticises the Islam, is a murderer, particularly when he claims to be a Christian.

I say conscious because no such understanding has ever been purely derived from some primal revelation, even when claims to that effect are made.

While Becker probably overstates the case when he claims that the unity of aim of religion and psychology has brought clergymen and psychiatrists «into a contiguity and interlacing of work where it is no longer possible to distinguish neatly the psychologist from his religious colleague,» (Russell J. Becker, «Links Between Psychology and Religion,» American Psychologist, 1958, 13, pp. 566 - 68.)

The second thing wrong with Rabbi Petuchowski's argument is that it libels Jews when it claims that they harbor «Jewish animosity» toward «public celebration of the birthday of Jesus of Nazareth.»

When the claims are false, people are justified in being offended.

Nippert oversteps when she claims that political mobilization is the cause of falling church attendance.

He regards philosophy as a never finished essay in fathoming the intelligibility of things, and it is always mistaken when it claims completeness for its conclusions.

When claims to rights are severed from the just requirements of morality and the common good, the inevitable result is a distorted understanding of human rights that all too often leads to the violation of the rights of others.

When claims are verified, we can start referring to them as «knowledge».

Hutchens makes no sense when he claims even the most conservative evangelicals are Meliorists, for all conservative evangelicals reject at least two of the three parts of the Meliorist method.

he's either lying or being self - delusional when he claims it was his faith that made him not wrestle her.

But when it claims that the «free» contraceptive coverage can be afforded by the insurer because «cost - savings» will result from «improvements in women's health and fewer childbirths,» the administration is admitting that the contraception is already being paid for by the employer, if its policy covers childbirth and women's health in general.

Even a Europhile would have to admit he's right when he claims Europe has too little solidarity and too much austerity.

But some industries may be more at risk of sharp, reactive share declines when claims surface.

Opinion: Wynne is wrong when she claims the Conservative carbon tax plan will cost families more than cap and trade and do less to cut emissions

A significant portion of these claims appear to be of a speculative nature and, while providing windfall revenues to businesses and consultants when their claims are successful, they are, at most, of questionable value as incentives for the claimed SR&ED.

And in 1997 CMHC lost money on its mortgage insurance business when claims outweighed premiums by $ 50 million due to a weak housing and employment market.

States also scrutinize worker classification when claims are made by workers for unemployment compensation and workers» compensation.

Meanwhile, a Dutch computer science student got some press last week when he claimed all chats on WhatsApp are compromised due to flaws in the app's encryption.

Timely notice is especially crucial with so - called claims - made policies, under which coverage is based on when the claim was made rather than when the event took place, says Jay M. Levin, an insurance litigator at Reed Smith.

Lane Bryant, a U.S. clothing chain for plus - sized women, caused a commotion in April when it claimed ads for its lingerie had been rejected by ABC and Fox.