When the coal and oil lobby could not disprove the findings by the IPCC that human - induced global warming is under way, it launched a second round of attacks — this time on the reputations and integrity of Dr. Benjamin Santer and other unsuspecting scientists who have been blindsided by the personal nature of the assaults.
In the 1960s,
when coal and oil were being burnt more in many countries, the rate of increase was only half what it is now.
Not exact matches
Similar to some
oil and gas companies, many
coal miners accumulated major debt loads
when prices were high
and demand seemed sustainable.
Darin Kingston of d.light, whose profitable solar - powered LED lanterns simultaneously address poverty, education, air pollution / toxic fumes / health risks, energy savings, carbon footprint,
and more Janine Benyus, biomimicry pioneer who finds models in the natural world for everything from extracting water from fog (as a desert beetle does) to construction materials (spider silk) to designing flood - resistant buildings by studying anthills in India's monsoon climate,
and shows what's possible
when you invite the planet to join your design thinking team Dean Cycon, whose coffee company has not only exclusively sold organic fairly traded gourmet coffee
and cocoa beans since its founding in 1993, but has funded dozens of village - led community development projects in the lands where he sources his beans John Kremer, whose concept of exponential growth through «biological marketing,» just as a single kernel of corn grows into a plant bearing thousands of new kernels, could completely change your business strategy Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, who built a near - net - zero - energy luxury home back in 1983,
and has developed a scientific, economically viable plan to get the entire economy off
oil,
coal,
and nuclear
and onto renewables — while keeping
and even improving our high standard of living
When the weather warms up, this is even more delicious if you brush the eggplant
and zucchini with a little olive
oil and grill them over hot
coals.
When charcoal turns grayish white (after 15 to 20 minutes)
and you can hold your hand 5 inches above rack for 3 to 4 seconds, sear chicken breasts, starting with skin sides down, on a lightly
oiled rack over
coals, uncovered, turning once, until well browned, 5 to 6 minutes total.
When the
coals have burned down to a medium heat, rub the fillets with olive
oil and grill for four or five minutes per side, turning once.
Prepare a charcoal grill
and when the
coals are medium hot, brush the onions with the
oil and place over the
coals to roast, turning frequently so they don't burn.
Natural gas, which is mainly methane, may generate less carbon dioxide than
oil and coal when burned, but as recent research has found, there's more to greenhouse gas emissions than just combustion.
There are over 100 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) found in
oil,
coal and tar, which are readily released into the environment
when fossil fuels are burned.
When we burn
coal or
oil to make electricity, for example, our society accepts the detrimental health effects
and the environmental costs they entail.
Salem Station became a target in the late 1990s,
when environmental, health
and civic groups launched a campaign to force Massachusetts to clean up what they called the «Filthy Five» — a group of
coal -
and oil - fired power plants built before 1977
and grandfathered under the Clean Air Act from meeting new air pollution standards.
But
when existing trees are burned for bioenergy, bioenergy takes carbon that would otherwise be stored
and puts it into the air, just like burning
coal or
oil.
The numbers are even more sobering
when you consider all the fossil fuels —
coal, natural gas,
and oil — that people consume.
Solving the issue could bring closer the day
when disaster victims can successfully sue
oil and coal companies.
Mercury is a neurotoxin that settles into the ocean in large concentrations after we spew it out of industrial smokestacks
when burning fossil fuels like
coal and oil.
Keeping in mind the enormous stake that panel members ExxonMobil
and Shell have in the
oil, natural gas
and coal industries, here is a look at the panel's take on why
oil and coal have been so difficult to replace by the following alternative energy sources: Natural gas ExxonMobil favors boosting the U.S.'s consumption of natural gas, in part, because it produces at least 50 percent less greenhouse gas per hour
when burned compared with
coal, Nazeer Bhore, ExxonMobil senior technology advisor, said during the panel.
Natural gas is often touted as more sustainable than
coal and oil because it releases fewer pollutants
when it burns.
When he said that, in 1945, nobody knew that there was plenty of
coal under the North Sea too, not to mention
oil and gas fields.
Shell states that tar sands are less damaging that
coal: Well since
when was
coal and oil used to the same ends unless they are talking about widespread adaption of CTL technology which could happen in some countries with large scale
coal rserves I guess but even I doubt that CTL projects will scale to 3 — 5 mbpd which is the projected output of Albertas
oil sands come 2030.
When carbon dioxide from the burning of
coal,
oil,
and gas dissolves in the ocean, some of it becomes carbonic acid.
The Lackawanna Hotel, where we spent the night, occupies a grand old train station that used to bustle with passenger traffic but fell moribund
when the city's star faded along with Pennsylvania
coal and oil production.
If /
when oil gets over $ 100 / barrel
and stays there, a combination of
coal, nuclear, solar
and wind will be used to generate electricity,
and electric cars will become more common.
When we send money to big
oil and king
coal, that money gets filtered upward into a top - down corporate hegemony that keeps money out of local communities.
Then they dropped between 1940
and 1975,
when the use of
oil and coal increased, he said.
Oil and coal era will finished in the future when no oil and coal to d
Oil and coal era will finished in the future
when no
oil and coal to d
oil and coal to dig.
When the
coal,
oil and uranium use up, this tecnology will no meaning, but in order to develop this technology, people will use much energy
and financial, we should ask us is it worth?
If we should have luck here in Germany,
and the EEG does not fail, it would mean that in 20 years we'd have a grid mostly powered by renewable energy, paid by the private households alone, that will produce cheap electricity for the industry at a time
when oil, gas
and coal will be much more expansive than today.
We already use very little
coal,
and we're running hard to slow,
and then lower our use of
oil & gas so that our economy keeps rolling,
and people's houses are still livable,
when oil,
and then gas get really expensive, not this wimpy
oil rise we've seen lately.
This works for biofuels, as growing crops absorb atmospheric CO2
and convert it to sugars, oils, etc., leading to no net change in atmospheric CO2
when the fuel is burned — but it does not work for
coal,
oil or natural gas, however.
-- For the moment, it's not cheap to move away from the fuels of convenience,
coal and oil, that
when burned are the main source of human - generated greenhouse gases.
President Obama was right
when he campaigned on the idea that the country has to abandon its «shock to trance» approach to energy policy
and investment if it ever hopes to cut the addiction to
oil pointed out by his predecessor, not to mention the persistent allure of
coal («clean» or otherwise).
A molecule of CO2 from
coal, in a certain sense, is different from one from
oil or gas, because in the case of
oil and gas, it doesn't matter too much
when you burn it, because a good fraction of it's going to stay there 500 years anyway.
Their critics say their stance, however well intentioned, will produce the real delays, given how much can be done now simply by cutting energy waste with tools already on the shelf — ranging from strengthening efficiency standards to eliminating billions of dollars in persistent fossil - fuel subsidies that continue to make
coal and oil much cheaper than they really are
when all their hidden costs are revealed.
When the use of
oil and coal goes up, pollution goes up.
And when you have used the coal, gas and oil to make ethanol, or used the oil, you don't get to use it aga
And when you have used the
coal, gas
and oil to make ethanol, or used the oil, you don't get to use it aga
and oil to make ethanol, or used the
oil, you don't get to use it again.
Peaking
oil and natural gas extraction is going to accelerate global warming
when many desperate people use wood
and coal for heating
and cooking.
What do you suppose will happen
when we run out of fossil fuels, as we are likely to do in the near future (decades for
oil and perhaps a century for
coal)?
when the planet has been sufficiently cooled by a thick, grimy
and everpresent layer of
coal dust, we'll all be wishing on a star for just another teacup of
oil....
When he gets elected, I fully expect Obama to ditch his
oil and coal company supporters
and do what's right for his country
and the world.
So
when we burn
coal or
oil for energy or cut down forests
and add even more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, the planet warms up.
The grid operator testified that «wholesale energy prices
and emissions will rise
when extreme weather results in natural gas pipeline constraints — driving up the price of natural gas (
and wholesale energy)
and forcing New England to rely on
oil -
and coal - fired generation for multi-day (or multi-week) periods.»
The findings come at a time
when coal is on track to surpass
oil as the world's top energy source
and 2.8 billion people rely on wood, crop waste, dung,
and other biomass to cook
and heat their homes.
I talk about how
when we burn fossil fuels, such as
coal,
oil,
and natural gas for our energy, it releases carbon dioxide (CO2) into our air supply.
A federal district judge ruled Friday that the Bureau of Land Management violated the law
when it made 80 billion tons of
coal available for leasing
and opened up more than 8 million acres for
oil and gas development in the Powder River Basin without first assessing the environmental risks or considering any alternatives.
Unfortunately, mean temperatures have risen much further
when account is taken of the short - term masking effect of aerosols emitted from
coal and oil, mainly sulphur dioxide
and its oxidized products... «Thus, according to -LSB-...]
Perhaps the most totemic sign of the times came in September
when the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, a philanthropic body set up by the heirs to the Standard
Oil fortune, announced that it would pull its money out of fossil fuels, beginning with
coal and tar sands.
Many analysts are suggesting that — with prices falling
and production costs rising — the coming year could be
when investors realize the game is up for the
coal and oil industries.
Neilio, I'm with you on this.I just love the way you stand up to that guy's strange arguments.I too am extremely concerned at the way we are all being made to follow this crazy «science», to the detriment of most normal Humans» lives.I'm in England.We are living on a huge mass of fossil fuel, (
coal,
oil and now gas from Fracking),
and we're being told that we must not use it to keep warm.
Coal - fired power plants are being shut down.Useless windfarms are swamping our country.Nuclear stations are planned
when Germany has banned them in favour of
Coal.China
and India are building
and using more
coal stations than we ever did.
The priests will explain that the Hockey Stick graph is really not faked [there was no Medieval Warming Period, ity was made up by the
oil / gas /
coal industry], the dangerous warming they predicted 25 years ago really, really happened (it just got buried in the deep oceans — at a time
when the pacific is unnaturally cold)
and so on..