Index funds were not available in the days
when the Efficient Market Theory was being developed.
Not exact matches
The newly - proposed course description for â $ ˜Financial Economicsâ $ ™, still contained among its contents the â $ ˜testing the efficiency of
markets.â $ ™
When I objected to this, given the financial meltdown that we had just witnessed and the irrefutable evidence that this
theory did not hold water, I was told that the
theory of
efficient financial
markets still had to be tested to decide of its real - world relevance.
When someone says they are going «to fully prove to proponents of the
Efficient Market Hypothesis that their
theory that stocks are always correctly priced is erroneous» and also show us how to pick stocks — thats a very big check to cash.
If Financial Uproar will have me, I will post additional Guest Blog Entries telling the story that you need to hear to help both yourself, the investing experts, and our entire nation out of the corner into which we all painted ourselves
when we gave our too easy acceptance to the
Efficient Market Theory and the Buy - and - Hold Model before we were truly sure.
Then he asked how many would be doing research
when they got back to the office that was rooted in a belief in the
Efficient Market Theory.
It blew me away
when he talked about how there was a version of the
Efficient Market Disease — I mean,
Theory!
Juicy Excerpt: Fama was onto something huge
when he developed the
Efficient Market Theory.
Buy - and - Hold makes a call on this but the call is hidden and not rooted in a rational assessment (it was rooted in a rational assessment in the days
when serious people believed in the
Efficient Market Theory, but those days are long gone).
The idea that there is no need to change one's stock allocation in response to big price swings is a holdover from an earlier era, an era
when the evidence that the
Efficient Market Theory is wrong was nowhere near as compelling as it is today.
I was watching a video with the US hedge fund manager on Conversations with Tyler (value investing heretic alert, Asness is a student of Eugene Fama, the author of the original
efficient market theory, and a successful momentum trader)
when he was asked to identify a bubble in the world today.
The comparisons to financial
markets are getting OT and a little silly, but bender is on shaky ground
when he claims that historical stock price movements are ``... «informative» in the sense of information
theory...» In fact, the weak - form
Efficient Market Hypothesis, which is the basis of much of modern finance, posits the exact opposite — that all relevant information is contained in the current stock price and there is no informational content in historical movements.
In your economics classes, do you spend all of your Q&A discussing going back to the gold standard
when the class was on
efficient market theory?