Sentences with phrase «when evidence points»

They would publish all results whether supportive or not of their theory and admit when the evidence points in the other direction.

has Proyas scolding that one should always be prepared for happy accidents on the set — a funny thing to say when all evidence points to a production so micro-managed that every trace of life has been sucked clean from it like meat from the bone.

Two exceptional lawyers with a romantic history step into a dangerous web of secrets and lies, and when evidence points to a possible British Secret Service cover up, it's not just their reputations, but their lives that are at stake.

Everton supporters often cite the most annoying factor facet of Martinez is his overly positive outlook on the performances when evidence points in another direction — the same applies here, there's a time and a place for mindless positivity and the end of last season, alongside the last two performances, was not the time.

god is the ONLY default you people always go to EVEN when the evidence points definitively in another more likely direction.

However, this does not imply some of the more ridiculous tenets of creationism (such as man walking with dinosaurs or the world being 6000 years old) should be objectively viewed as truth when all evidence points to evolution as fact.

Not exact matches

However, she concluded, if more evidence will point that way, wealth and income disparities might make it onto the list of things the Fed looks at when trying to make sense of the U.S. economy and formulate its policy.

The Wisdom of Keith Richards (Wall Street Journal) Keith Richards, shrouded in an ever - present cloud of cigarette smoke, wheezes a laugh when it's pointed out that many observers, based on evidence to date, disagree with his sense of his own mortality.

Over at WaPo, wherein I argue that a) when we hit the next recession, many policy makers will point to our higher - than - average debt / GDP ratio as evidence that we have too little fiscal space to engage in offset fiscal stimulus, and b) those policy makers will be wrong.

Yes I know this will happen because I have been through these arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people claim to have read and match it to the scientific evidence that points very clearly to the validity and truth of the Bible they shut up and don't want to hear it.

The evidence on this point comes down to this: When Washington prays and urges the nation (or his army) to pray, does he expect God to care about the fate of the American cause, as distinct from the British cause, since they also pray to the same God?

As I wrote, you can't use reason or logic, based on EVIDENCE when conversing with people who will use the word «faith» as a retort, or counter point.

There are parents who will tell you that they knew when their child was young... it's not taught, it's not something these people can switch on and off; it's not a phase... it has to do with genetic coding to a point and for you to continue to deny the evidence that points to this only shows your bigotry.

At that point I hadn't had as much evidence presented to me, and although I tended to believe the story already, I decided to split the public theology from the private behavior when I reviewed The Didache.

None of the foundational parts of the bible have any supporting evidence, and the evidence we do have points away from a personal god, so those promises are unverifiable and when you're worm food it wil be too late.

The intuitional evidence for belief in Allah, the belief based upon the recognition of Allah by our inner consciousness, is brought to our attention in the Qur» an by pointing out the important psychological fact that there is an instinctive feeling of faith in Almighty Allah, the Creator of the universe, which comes to men when they are free from inclinations, or the distractions of dull routines, or when surprised by the question of the origin of the universe, or when faced with hardships or misfortunes which they can not overcome by themselves.

Historical critics typically gather all evidence from within a letter that might point to a specific rhetorical situation; then, with the help of other information — when available — reconstruct the situation Paul addresses; and, finally, read the details of the letter as they fit within that reconstruction.

External evidence points to the summer of 1927 as the moment when the original manuscript, or at least parts of it, was written.

When someone brings up any of those things, science merely points out that there is no evidence for them... neither direct evidence nor indirect.

Especially those trying ignorantly pointing fingers at religious people when there is no evidence to back it up yet besides their bias opinions.

As for failure to show that God exists, as I've asked elsewhere, just what kind of «evidence» are you looking for, and just how long do you think it is going to be before you begin to contradict yourself, when it is pointed out to you that your empirical demand for «evidence» will only take you so far when it comes to knowing anything?

Plenty of evidence is in on this point: when a ruling elite decides to destroy a group of people in a society, most of the people who are not targeted will not resist, whatever their religious affiliation.

One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they they base their beliefs on.

That's only useful when you need to rely upon talking people into seeing your point of view, and people with evidence on their side really shouldn't have to do that.

yes i have looked at all the evidence and seen at first, all finger pointed to the man and then when the witnesses recanted their stories, would that make you think twice and three times before taking a life.

Capital punishment's lack of demonstrated superiority as a deterrent (the evidence for its effectiveness being at best mixed), the capacity of society to protect itself equally well by permanently imprisoning those who are currently being executed (which is possible at limited marginal cost, especially when one takes into account the cost of the extended trial procedures and interminable appeals and reviews which usually accompany capital punishment)-- all these points are important, but their utility is chiefly as rebuttal arguments in response to the empirically weak but emotionally strong claims made on behalf of capital punishment.

So when eternal conscious torment is the very question at hand, what biblical evidence would you point to as teaching that the resurrected bodies of the lost will likewise be made immortal?

Although scientists behave as if their theories are facts, often arguing ferociously against critics, key paradigms of science can shift rapidly and fundamentally when empirical evidence reaches a tipping point.

«This is a turning point when evidence is everywhere that our leaders have failed,» he said.

One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they base their beliefs on.

And when I say eaducated guesses, I mean that there is not enough evidence to say one thing or another, so you have to look at the evidence and say what you think the evidence points to.

So it appears that questions are unwise when all the evidence points in a particular direction, but we still raise questions.

Some people point to 1 Corinthians 13:10 as evidence that when we get to heaven we will be perfect, but this verse is talking about spiritual gifts and is not teaching anything about mental or physical perfection when we get to heaven.

When you provide evidence that your god or jesus exists, then you can spew your distaste of this woman but until that point, let her rest in peace and have some respect for the deceased!

Especially when you bring up the point of what kind of evidence I am talking about.

Without any firm evidence for selecting that cutoff point, I reasoned that clashing definitions of ultimate reality are likely to clash only when supported by at least a handful of opposing «believers.»

I'm sorry, when you make a point you're supposed to provide evidence for your claim.

My point is that there is no verifiable evidence for your imaginary friend god and when you make dumb a $ s statements as you did and then expect people to believe in your imaginary friend god, you don't make the creature sound very appealing to anyone who is not gullible enough to believe in it... try making it sound like a nicer creature instead of a monster!

With Ricky Silberman's assistance he reassembled his brief of facts and allegations, suppressed disconfirming evidence, strong - armed a hostile witness, and blasted Mayer and Abrahamson's book to the point of denying at least one claim that he knew was true: «Up to this point in my career, even when I fell short, I had always believed I was pursuing accurate information.

But Stanford exploded for 46 points per game and 8 yards per play in this span, and when you expect to see a breakout, you don't need as much evidence to assume a breakout has occurred.

As of Monday, Reilly's investigation had uncovered no evidence of point shaving, but the BC scandal revealed a deep and troubling gambling involvement by team members and served as a warning to all college athletes: When they place a bet with a bookie, they are risking more than money or the possibility that bookies might get their hooks into them.

The strongest evidence to that point is that when James lunges forward with the ball and puts it over the goal line, it wiggles a bit in his hands as he comes to the grass.

But when you claim Mitchell is «beasting» and people point out that the game he just had wouldn't fall into that category and provides evidence to back it up, you respond by saying people are in denial, they don't give him credit, and they should «foh».

I wouldn't take this rumor as truth due to the lack of evidence, I will point to how Wenger has looked to offload players at 30 when Arsenal have backed him, if Silent Stan is actually going to get the players Wenger wants this time round then I would think Wenger is looking at top YOUNGISH talent who can do the job for us now.

When nobody listened he went to the Western Front and gathered evidence that proved his point.

There is a quite widely held theory in the football world that Arsenal have become a team that just can not seem to produce our best performances when it really matters and there is evidence that the proponents of this theory can point to for support, most recently the slips against the likes of Swansea and Man United that effectively ended our chances of the Premier League title.

When you consider that home field advantage is typically value between 2.5 to 3 - points, this would seem to provide further evidence that oddsmakers believe Green Bay is the superior team.

Wright points to an 84 — 72 win over Siena in the second round — when Reynolds bedeviled the Saints with 25 points, five assists and eight rebounds — as evidence of his star's evolution.

Bergsson's assertion regarding Sigurdsson being granted the freedom to operate high up the pitch is supported by the evidence from the weekend's encounter with Palace — when victory moved the Blues within two points of seventh - placed Burnley, scarcely two months after they approached the West Ham fixture guarding a two - point buffer to the bottom three.

A mother six times over, it quickly becomes clear that her point of view is based not only on biology and sound evidence — these practices have actually enriched her own family life and her latest book is a letter to other parents detailing how we too can strengthen our family's connection as well, when applied with practicality.