At a time
when federal education policy is focused on getting all students to proficiency, and budget shortfalls have led to cutbacks in all sorts of special programs, the best and the brightest are mostly left to fend for themselves.
Not exact matches
The charter school advocacy group Families for Excellent Schools, a frequent critic of the
education policies advanced by Mayor Bill de Blasio, a Democrat, was a plaintiff
when the lawsuit was filed in Brooklyn
federal court in April 2016.
After years of debate, the newly minted Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) has finally made one thing clear: states, not the
federal government, are in the driver's seat
when it comes to
education policy.
The 2,308 students in the OSP study make it the largest school voucher evaluation in the U.S., making the achievement results even more compelling
when compared to results from other, similar experimental evaluations of
education policies undertaken by the
federal government.
When it comes to school reform, a current wave of rhetoric and recent changes in
federal education policy, including the No Child Left Behind Act, have put the spotlight on the academic achievement gap.
At a time
when other
federal and state
policies are focused on achievement, school results, and the narrowing of learning gaps, why do we carve out a huge subpart of K — 12
education for a program that's still centered on inputs and services?
Finding that «local
policy prerogatives and dire financial conditions trumped
federal pleas for reform and led to the spending of massive amounts of aid on preserving the status quo and protecting existing jobs and programs,» Smarick urges policymakers to heed the lessons learned from that experience and to focus on reducing the gulf between reforms promised and reforms delivered
when it comes to the Department of
Education's $ 4.35 billion Race to the Top fund.
For decades, conservatives have generally followed two principles
when it comes to
federal K — 12
education policy: Respect state and local control of schools, and demand improved academic achievement in exchange for
federal funds.
Policies that promote school integration by race and class took a significant hit last week
when the U.S. Department of
Education announced that it was killing a small but important
federal program to support local diversity efforts.
Because, at least
when it comes to
education policy, just about everything he wants the
federal government to do involves things that can't be done successfully from Washington but that well - led states can and should do: raise academic standards, evaluate teachers, give kids choices, and more.
When the dust settles from the midterm elections,
federal lawmakers — the re-elected and losers alike — will head back to Washington for a lame - duck session with a long to - do list that could have broad implications for
education policy over the next year.
Todd Ziebarth, vice president for
policy for the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, said he thinks states such as Washington are «in for a rude awakening,»
when the
federal education dollars don't flow into state coffers.
Kline's original goal was to move away from an omnibus approach to
federal education policy as represented by No Child and offer up five bills that would essentially revert back to the days before the passage of No Child,
when federal dollars were handed out to states without showing any results.
Closing the achievement gap between the United States» disadvantaged students and the rest of our students has been the major focus of
federal education policy since 1965, when the Elementary and Secondary Education Act wa
education policy since 1965,
when the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act wa
Education Act was passed.
The latest results on the most important nationwide math test show that student achievement grew faster during the years before the Bush - era No Child Left Behind law,
when states were dominant in
education policy, than over the years since,
when the
federal law has become a powerful force in classrooms.
That it means pushing for a rollback of
federal education policy that have helped black and brown children as well as a return to the bad old days
when states and districts were allowed to ignore their obligations to poor and minority children doesn't factor into any of their thinking.
Released by the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), a
federal initiative that aims to inform educators and policymakers as they work toward improving
education, the compiled resources also include an instructional video that shows how to use the WWC
when making decisions about new math programs,
policies, and practices.
When federal policy conflicts with a solid body of evidence, one would expect our state
education officials, those charged with safeguarding the educational rights and welfare of our children, to provide guidance on sound testing
policy.
I'm also quite sure of how difficult a task it is to push the standards rock up the status quo hill, particularly in a day and age
when we are wary of testing in general and many are waiting to see what will become of the accountability standards in NCLB as wishes move to reauthorization, multiple measures, and a new look on
federal education policy.
As a TeachPlus Teacher - In - Residence, she conducts research and
policy analysis on
federal policies related to
education and reform — a role that allows her to connect back to her time as a Congressional staffer for Senator Paul Wellstone and Senator Tammy Baldwin
when she represented the 2nd District of Wisconsin.
His 1964 book Shaping
Education Policy was written when the GI Bill, the National Defense Education Act, Great Society legislation and other initiatives had greatly enlarged the federal role in e
Education Policy was written
when the GI Bill, the National Defense
Education Act, Great Society legislation and other initiatives had greatly enlarged the federal role in e
Education Act, Great Society legislation and other initiatives had greatly enlarged the
federal role in
educationeducation.
The No Child Left Behind Act may have given the
federal government a big say over K - 12
policy — but Congress and the administration remain minority investors
when it comes to
education funding.
The centerpiece
federal law for K — 12
education, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), set teacher quality as a major policy priority when it was reauthorized as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
education, the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act (ESEA), set teacher quality as a major policy priority when it was reauthorized as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Education Act (ESEA), set teacher quality as a major
policy priority
when it was reauthorized as No Child Left Behind (NCLB) in 2001.
The NHEA serves as a means to fund revitalization of Hawaiian as a means to restore both the linguistic integrity and educational excellence that were lost to Native Hawaiians during the long territorial period
when federal government
policy denied the right of Native Hawaiians to a public
education through the medium of Hawaiian.
The program ended
when Congress failed to appropriate funds for its continuation in the 2015
federal spending bill.14 In some sectors, there is increased debate about whether
federal funds for
education are best allocated through formulas or competitive processes, with opponents of competitive grants citing a desire to reduce
federal influence in favor of state and locally - driven
education policies.
At a time
when education is acknowledged as a priority for America's success and competitiveness, NSBA believes that it is imperative that
federal policy — including implementation of the child nutrition reauthorization — assures that educational systems are supported, not undermined by unfunded mandates or under - resourced requirements.
More recently, the advocacy group Parents United for Responsible
Education put the issue on the front burner
when it filed a
federal civil rights complaint against the district's retention
policy because of its disparate racial impact.
The 2016 — 17 school year is sure to bring plenty of developments
when it comes to
education policy, and like you, we're eager to see what decisions are made at the
federal and state levels.
An even more important, but unresolved issue, is how Perry can even replicate Capital Prep Magnet School in Bridgeport and Harlem
when federal copyright laws and Hartford Board of
Education policies appear to make it clear that the concepts, materials, curriculum,
policies and procedures that Perry has said he will be using in his charter schools actually belong to the Hartford Board of
Education and the taxpayers of Hartford and do not belong to Perry or Perry's private company as he claimed in his Bridgeport and Harlem charter school proposals.
Observed strict confidentiality and safeguarded all patient - related information.Developed and managed budget and revenue expectations while actively seeking ways to eliminate or reduce expenses.Organized and led weekly personnel meetings with team members.Established and maintained positive relationships with government regulators, residents, families, other area health care providers, physicians and community at large.Minimized staff turnover through appropriate selection, orientation, training, staff
education and development.Diligently monitored the QA (Quality Assurance) program to improve performance and maintain high standards of care.Regularly evaluated employee performance, provided feedback and assisted, coached and disciplined staff as needed.Jumped in to fill gaps for on call rotation
when necessary.Provided thorough supervision for day - to - day operations of facility in accordance with set
policies and guidelines.Actively maintained up - to - date knowledge of applicable state and
Federal laws and regulations.Ensured the accuracy of public information and materials.Cooperated with other health related agencies and organizations in community activities.Served as liaison between management, clinical staff and the community.Administered, directed and coordinated the activities of the agency.Created annual goals, objectives and budget and made recommendations to reduce costs.Evaluated patient care procedural changes for effectiveness.
Medical Assistant — Duties & Responsibilities Provide an informed point of contact to patient, communicating effectively with other medical staff and interested parties to facilitate the efficient execution of procedures for patients as well as ensure timely information flow Execute frequent patient evaluations upon escort to examination rooms, including the monitoring and tracking of vital signs and assistance with minor procedures including EKG, Pap smears, cultures, urinalysis, and others Coordinate all pharmacy - and insurance - related aspects between doctors, physicians, and licensed nursing professionals, including prescription submission, insurance pre-authorization, and referrals Alert physicians to any change in condition and raise concerns
when necessary Provide support and supervision to other staff and coordinate all care efforts, including material and equipment prep, procedure and appointment scheduling, vaccine administration, patient charting, and records management Collaborate in the execution of all plans of treatment, providing assistance and answering questions related to all instructions for home care Aid in the delivery of informational support to patients, families, and other interested parties, helping them understand conditions, treatments, and potential outcomes Develop and maintain competencies and knowledge of medical techniques, information, conditions, treatments, medications, and potential interactions Adhere strictly to local, state, and
federal health - related laws, as well as facility
policies, rules, and procedures, in the administration of care and treatment of patients Address patient and doctor queries, resolving them in an expedited manner, while participating in training practices to continue advanced
education and leverage facility resources and personnel Track, file, and view important medical documents, receipts, insurance records, and billing invoices on a daily basis, organizing and managing sensitive files and patient information in an efficient manner Maintain patient files, entering results into respective databases while auditing for accuracy and completion Assist other personnel with various duties as assigned to facilitate efficient administrative and business operations