Similarly,
when a fossil fuel burning power plant dumps carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, its owners don't pay for the resulting climate disruption.
You can see this pioneer effect in the growth of CO2 mixing ratios from a bit earlier than 1800 to maybe 1900
when fossil fuel burning takes over.
When a fossil fuel burns, it radiates heat and releases carbon dioxide.
Not exact matches
The province, though, needs to recognize that if an emission - constrained world is going to limit the royalty revenue it collects from extracting
fossil fuels, then it will be better off with a tax regime that adds money to provincial coffers
when fuel is
burned.
Think of it as a homeowner who borrows based on the inflated value of a home:
When this «carbon bubble» bursts — for example, when governments finally enact policies to restrict or penalize the burning of carbon — the devaluation of fossil fuel reserves may be even worse than the housing bubble that sent shock waves down Wall Street five years
When this «carbon bubble» bursts — for example,
when governments finally enact policies to restrict or penalize the burning of carbon — the devaluation of fossil fuel reserves may be even worse than the housing bubble that sent shock waves down Wall Street five years
when governments finally enact policies to restrict or penalize the
burning of carbon — the devaluation of
fossil fuel reserves may be even worse than the housing bubble that sent shock waves down Wall Street five years ago.
When we
burn these
fossil fuels, or for that matter the trees in forests, carbon dioxide is returned to the atmosphere.
When we clear forests, we're not only knocking out our best ally in capturing the staggering amount of GHGs we humans create (which we do primarily by
burning fossil fuels at energy facilities, and of course, in cars, planes, and trains).
When it comes to environmental policy, the Trump Administration had ignored well established scientific evidence that the
burning of
fossil fuels is a prime contributor to global warming.
The Earth relies on its vegetative cover to extract and hold onto carbon dioxide
when a great deal of it finds its way into the atmosphere, as has happened with the
burning of
fossil fuels.
In addition, he said existing customers, such as a newly built Sheridan Hotel, have a bonus message to share with their customers: «
When you come to Georgetown, you're not burning fossil fuels when you turn on the lights.&ra
When you come to Georgetown, you're not
burning fossil fuels when you turn on the lights.&ra
when you turn on the lights.»
Now a group of researchers led by Steven Kuznicki at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and Anthony Ku at General Electric think they can be used to screen out the carbon dioxide produced
when processing or
burning fossil fuels.
«Anecdotally, our customers are saying, «If you give me the tools, I'll help you out
when the wind quits blowing so you don't have to keep the
fossil fuels burning in the background,»» Carlson says.
The original
fossil fuel is back in the spotlight, under fire for being the biggest contributor to climate change (
when burned in power plants).
When it's not horrific mining accidents like the one in Soma, Turkey, on May 13 that killed more than 300 miners, it's the 13,000 Americans who die early each year because of air pollution from
burning the dirtiest
fossil fuel.
CO2 is formed
when any kind of organic material or
fossil fuel, such as natural gas, petroleum, coal or gasoline, is
burned.
When fossil fuels such as gasoline are
burned, the chains of carbon that make them up are broken and carbon dioxide is released into the environment.
There are over 100 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) found in oil, coal and tar, which are readily released into the environment
when fossil fuels are
burned.
Previously, researchers have produced hydrogen gas in microbial - powered, batterylike
fuel cells, but only
when they supplemented the energy produced by the bacteria with electrical energy from external sources — such as that obtained from renewable sources or
burning fossil fuels, says Bruce Logan, an environmental engineer at Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Black carbon aerosols — particles of carbon that rise into the atmosphere
when biomass, agricultural waste, and
fossil fuels are
burned in an incomplete way — are important for understanding climate change, as they absorb sunlight, leading to higher atmospheric temperatures, and can also coat Arctic snow with a darker layer, reducing its reflectivity and leading to increased melting.
When humans
burn hydrocarbons, or
fossil fuels, the carbon reacts with oxygen.
When we do get rid of it, we should
burn it to offset
fossil fuels, part of a cascading system of multiple uses,» Kurz says.
Using carbon dioxide to pump out more
fossil fuels — and permanently storing the gas in the process — might sound counterproductive to limiting climate change because those
fuels,
when burned, put more CO2 into the atmosphere.
When fossil fuels are
burned, carbon dioxide (CO2) is emitted.
Aerosol chemist Markus Ammann of the Paul Scherrer Institute in Villigen, Switzerland, and his colleagues, suspected that soot particles — spewed
when fossil fuels are
burned — might have a hand in creating nitrous acid.
And ozone, which forms a beneficial shield against ultraviolet radiation
when high in the stratosphere, is an efficient greenhouse gas
when it appears at airliner altitudes — as it increasingly does, since it too is a by - product of
fossil fuel burning.
In essence, such technology catches the CO2 and other pollutants emitted
when coal or other
fossil fuels are
burned.
That mobilized me to think about
when we
burn fossil fuels or dump garbage, there is no way it just goes somewhere else.»
Indeed, he has evidence: the speediest drop in greenhouse gas pollution on record occurred in France in the 1970s and «80s,
when that country transitioned from
burning fossil fuels to nuclear fission for electricity, lowering its greenhouse emissions by roughly 2 percent per year.
He says the only answer may be immediate cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide from
burning of
fossil fuels, which would curb the amount of bleaching and limit acidification of oceans that results
when they absorb carbon dioxide.
Mercury is a neurotoxin that settles into the ocean in large concentrations after we spew it out of industrial smokestacks
when burning fossil fuels like coal and oil.
Even
when additional reduction measures are implemented against black carbon, or soot, which is released
when fossil fuels are
burned, they do little to slow down global warming in a 2 degrees scenario.
When fossil fuels are
burned, other climate - forcing gases are produced in addition to long - lasting carbon dioxide.
The local electric company performs that service far more efficiently
when it
burns fossil fuels in its big generators; the car stores only the residual electrical energy in its rechargeable batteries.
They eventually linked the mysterious pollution to a nearby natural - gas field, and their investigation has now produced the first hard evidence that the cleanest -
burning fossil fuel might not be much better than coal
when it comes to climate change.
And, if it were found in large enough quantities, some experts speculate that it could be used as a clean -
burning substitute for
fossil fuels today because it gives off high amounts of energy
when burned but emits only water, not carbon.
Although mercury, a neurotoxin, occurs naturally in the environment, it is also released into the atmosphere
when humans
burn coal and other
fossil fuels.
Acid rain arises
when sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides (NOx), emitted by
burning fossil fuels, react with water droplets in the air to form sulfuric and nitric acid.
But it must be noted that human activity is an explicit cause of the rising level of CO2 in the atmosphere, for example,
when fossil fuels are
burnt.
The increase started around 1800,
when we started
burning fossil fuels (mostly coal to start) in a big way at the start of the Industrial Revolution.
sulfur dioxide A pollutant made of sulfur and oxygen that forms
when fossil fuel is
burned.
Carbon dioxide also is released
when organic matter
burns (including
fossil fuels such as oil or gas).
When asked about global warming, 84 percent of scientists say the earth is getting warmer because of human activity such as
burning fossil fuels, while only 49 percent of the public agrees.
No oil is imported and no
fossil fuels are
burned when you go whale watching with us.
The 1840s gallery was chosen for the protest because it houses many paintings from the time of the industrial revolution,
when the large - scale
burning of
fossil fuels began in the west.
How can there be no linkage
when both have the same source, the
burning of
fossil fuels?
As here, refuting Jon Kirwan's concern (# 150): «the speediest drop in greenhouse gas pollution on record occurred in France in the 1970s and «80s,
when that country transitioned from
burning fossil fuels to nuclear fission for electricity, lowering its greenhouse emissions by roughly 2 percent per year.»
But CO2 never rose higher than 280 parts per million until around 1890,
when the
burning of
fossil fuels and forests began to generate enormous amounts of this gas.
Fossil fuels are made of hydrocarbons;
when they don't
burn completely, they are released into the air.
Updated below, 12:51 p.m. A comprehensive and sobering Associated Press story by Dina Cappiello provides a valuable update on how United States policies promoting exports of coal are undercutting domestic efforts to restrict emissions of carbon dioxide, the heat - trapping gas released
when fossil fuels are
burned.
what drivel... the timing couldnt be better (for Rs)
when oil prices are sky high and here is AlGo, the quintessential hypocrite who
burns more
fossil fuels and consumes more power than most would in a lifetime, propgandizing to the opposite...