Sentences with phrase «when framers»

James Sandman: Linda's got it exactly right and I don't think that when the framers in the first paragraph of the Constitution identified their priorities, I don't their order of listing was an accident.

Martha Derthick: When the framers of the United States Constitution wrote that it is a duty of the chief executive to «take care» that the laws be faithfully executed, they can hardly have imagined a law so freighted with perverse and destructive consequences as No Child Left Behind.

But it is important to add that when the framers of the Constitution envisioned the rough - and - tumble world of public argument, they almost certainly imagined heated disagreements against a background of broadly shared values; certainly that was the model offered by John Locke.

The first home being rebuilt in Fountaingrove reached a milestone recently when framers began roughing in the walls of Ed and Kathy Hamilton's Shillingford Place home.

We never went in there because of all the dust and insulation, but when our framer did, he found a box holding a bag of marijuana, a pipe for smoking it, and a book for growing it!

Not exact matches

When the constitutional mandate is sufficiently clear from the text, the understanding of the framers, or the structure of constitutional government, it removes certain matters from popular control and majoritarian rule.

But to claim that such a viewpoint is what the Framers had in mind when they wrote the Constitution in 1787 is, as Justice Byron White noted in another context, «at best facetious.»

You speak on what is «True Doctrine», could we also point to something such as the Consti; tution and the daily court room arguments of lawyers and clerks who feel that they alone know and understand the true meaning of the what the framers when they wrote the laws of this land?

None of which matters, really — arguing that the framers of the country intended it to be a Christian nation because they themselves were Christian when they specifically did not write that into the laws is just projecting your own desires onto them.

«Why» is not a very helpful question when considering English laws: even a quotation from Hansard saying what the framers of the law hoped to achieve is not generally acceptable in court, as the judges have to apply the law as it was written, not what was intended.

The sophisticated version of the Ford argument — not attributable to Ford, of course — is basically that the framers offered a squishy definition in faith that Congress would know an impeachable offense when it saw one.

We therefore have a collective duty to respect these rights of individuals, especially so, when such individuals occupy very important or strategic institutions of state which the framers of our constitution in their wisdom, found it prudent to guarantee their independence by among others insulating them from the interference or control of the Executive or any other body.

According to him, the framers of the constitution should have made provisions for the oath to be recited by the acting President when the need arises.

A makes a great advert for sweet potatoes and purple potatoes but is based on a fluke of evidence... And can only be suported by assuming that the human fram has a fragile constitution when it comes to the it's homeostasis.

When it comes to volatility, the Fram oil filter ads come to mind: «You can pay me now or you can pay me later.»

When I was a sales rep and first went out to galleries showing them a new line of brightly colored lacquer frames, most framers were visibly repulsed.

Selected group exhibitions include After The Thrill has Gone (Richmond Center for Visual Arts, Virginia, 2016), Re (as) ssisting Narratives (Framer Framed, Amsterdam, 2016), International Short Film Festival (Oberhausen, 2016), When Tomorrow Comes (Wits Art Museum, Johannesburg; Michaelis Galleries, Cape Town, 2015), DIS / PLACE (MoCADA, Brooklyn, 2015), AFIRIperFOMA (Lagos, 2015); What Remains is Tomorrow (South African Pavilion, Venice Biennale, 2015), La Fabrique (De L'Homme Moderne, in association with the Lyon Biennale, La Fabric, 2015), Solomon Foundation for Contemporary Art (2015), Foreign Bodies (WHATIFTHEWORLD, Cape Town, 2015), Broken English (Tyburn Gallery, London, 2015), Brave New World... 20 Years of Democracy (Iziko South African National Gallery, Cape Town, 2014),!

The painting was finished, turned over to a framer, forgotten for a year, retrieved, and then, when the Germans occupied the French capital, wrapped and abandoned yet again in a cupboard until after the war.

It could and often does lead to stalemate which is what the framers were looking for when they designed our republic.

It had a role due to increased ice fluxes through the Fram Strait in the early 1990s, when the AO / NAO was very positive.

When it comes to ice that is lost through transport (through the fram straight for example), probably.

The recent papers looking at ocean ingress into the basin is also a worry when we look at the SST's of those waters in Fram and Bering.

These considerations go far to support the opinion that the framers of our Constitution had not the Indian tribes in view when they opened the courts of the union to controversies between a State or the citizens thereof, and foreign states.

When introducing rights and freedoms, principles of fundamental justice, and guarantees of equality before the law, I accept that the framers didn't envision the precise Canada we live in today but it would be foolish revisionism to suggest that they didn't know something BIG was happening and that the seed they were planting would grow into a living tree whose branches and leaves could not be accurately predicted.

Article II of the Constitution prohibits a President from using the pardon power to overturn an impeachment.5 The Framers of the Constitution placed only this limitation on the ability of the President to exercise his pardon power, 6 and the only sanction for the abuse of the pardon power is the removal of the President through impeachment.7 The Constitution is silent, however, as to whether the President may grant himself a pardon from prosecution and, if so, when such a pardon may be issued.8 In the over 20,000 instances that Presidents have used this exclusive power, 9 no President has used this power to pardon himself.10

The Framers of our Constitution lived at a time when the Old World still tolerated in the shadow of ancient feudal traditions.

Since Section 230 preexisted that statutory scheme, the Framers could not have intended for the Section to apply only when the General Assembly enacts a budget bill.

I have redmi note 3 pro, with the help of small amount of Adreno510 it is able to play asphalt 8 at highest graphic setting on that 1080p display without any fram drop, totally smooth, but when it comes to mali then their 700 - 800 mhz mp4 gpu can't even handle asphalt 8 on a 720p display lol poor mali the gardener: p

A new, interactive game tool that shows how to take control of your messaging strategy through short, interactive exercises that focus on the most popular do's and don'ts framers can make when linking early child development messaging goals to government, fiscal policies.

When tribunal members are made to squirm under the microscope of media and public scrutiny when ruling on a contentious issue of legal veracity, and not just on political expediency, they often will choose to err on the side of the strict interpretation of the legislation as it was intended to be interpreted by its framers, and not by another legal analyst with awarded limited power who wants to twist the original intent into a shape that suits his / her political spin (at that particular point in time) to the detriment of his / her chosen target, which target was actually chosen by a third - party legal analyst with a vested interWhen tribunal members are made to squirm under the microscope of media and public scrutiny when ruling on a contentious issue of legal veracity, and not just on political expediency, they often will choose to err on the side of the strict interpretation of the legislation as it was intended to be interpreted by its framers, and not by another legal analyst with awarded limited power who wants to twist the original intent into a shape that suits his / her political spin (at that particular point in time) to the detriment of his / her chosen target, which target was actually chosen by a third - party legal analyst with a vested interwhen ruling on a contentious issue of legal veracity, and not just on political expediency, they often will choose to err on the side of the strict interpretation of the legislation as it was intended to be interpreted by its framers, and not by another legal analyst with awarded limited power who wants to twist the original intent into a shape that suits his / her political spin (at that particular point in time) to the detriment of his / her chosen target, which target was actually chosen by a third - party legal analyst with a vested interest.