Sentences with phrase «when giroud»

Everyone was hoping that Wenger would add another striker to the team as we all know that when Giroud gets injured there isn't a target man and real center forward to step up in his place.

Arsenal gathered up a bit though, when Giroud's header almost crept in, and a weak Ramsey pass was almost directed towards goal by Cazorla.

josif, Yes, I do see your point on when Giroud is more effective.

There is often no outlet, especially when Giroud played as the striker and it makes us look depressingly dull.

«He's in great form at the moment,» said Walcott, who was also in the side in midweek when Giroud's hat - trick at Olympiakos secured a place in the last 16 of the Champions League.

as for ozil, i remember watching a game last season when giroud received his annual champions league sending off.

That positive start to the second half paid off when Giroud, after such a bad miss in the first half, scored a superb second goal.

When Giroud's suspended, Welbeck's injured and Podolski's gone on loan to Inter but you're still at Arsenal.

The match, which had warded off worries of being called off, was curtailed in snow, and it was the Gunners» who had the first shot on goal, when Giroud, played in by Walcott, saw his attempt narrowly skim the far side of the post.

It's no lie in saying that Arsenal play their best attacking football when Giroud is on the pitch.

bigger tests to come with you back plan when giroud comes up a crocker.

when Giroud injured, who do you prefer?

But minutes later it was Cech with a finger tip when Giroud looked to have shot the ball in the goal.

It was incredibly annoying (to me and to the Arsenal players, it appeared) and I have to say it drained me of any pity there might have been when Giroud scored.

Did you see the incident early in the match when Giroud was kicked in the face — I think by Vertongen — Dean seemed to let Vertongen away with that one.

Prior to the League Cup game, Giroud had scored four times in four appearances, and hopefully he finds the net tonight as well, although Sanchez tends to be our main outlet when Giroud plays.

And a few minutes later Kompany commits a foul when Giroud goes past him not that far from the half way line.

In effect, it meant Arsenal were playing without a centre - forward because Walcott stayed out on the left when Giroud went off.

There were moments where Swansea rode their luck, particularly when Giroud volleyed on to the bar before the break and when Sanchez curled a free - kick on to the woodwork.

It's clearly just to boost confidence as you can't have a deflated striker like Torres, especially when Giroud is out for 6 months.

It's obviously a strength when Giroud is in, not so much when Walcott is in — but there are different strengths that come along with that.

OMG, I think we are blaming the wring player, RAMSEY was our best midfielder in the first half, he only gave the ball away once in the 44th minute when Giroud did not react to the pass..

When Giroud joined, he was as good as he was going to get.

Now, look at the situation when Giroud returns..

So just for the benefit of all of us can someone elaborate as to when Giroud will hit form or when the switch in Walcotts head will be activated to let him know he is now a striker... Just to ease the irritation im experiencing

OT I see that arsene wenger these years doesn't take any risk He may get the tactics right but he don't olay the players whom can do this tactics on the pitch How does he want to play counter attacking game with giroud uptop Believe me it's not coincidence that alexis doesn't perform when giroud is on the pitch I don't know how a coach with arsene wenger history and experience doesn't find a solution for a very simple fact.

But Arsenal asserted their game again and it looked nearly inevitable when Giroud was given loads of space to slot the ball past Fabianski, and within a minute Alexis had made it three and Huddersfield had fough the good fight but ultimately failed in yet another away game.

«Three points today, a point at Old Trafford (when Giroud scored in the 89th minute to earn a 1 - 1 draw against Manchester United).

When Giroud came on, Wenger should have just demanded lots of crosses, and long balls, but instead the crosses were few and far between, and we kept trying to play the ball through the eye of a needle, even though Utd had so many defending.

He saved us when Giroud was out injured.

Ever since the game against Crystal Palace when Giroud scored that stunning volley, he has looked out of sorts and the fans of France and Arsenal have had no compunction about telling him what they think.

No we won't score that much when giroud is leading our line My problem with giroud is not about missing some easy chances which all playera do but it is about his movement, his first touch and his ball control (no one can deny he is holding up play goddess) If you watch the game carefully you will find that 75 % of losing position will be due to him he is simply ruining our attack systems and i hate to see this

Kind of like us with Sanchez when Giroud was injured (excluding Podolski, of course, but as we all know — he could be the best player in the world for a match and still wouldnt be automatically picked for the next)

Secondly, we were also not given a penalty when Giroud was fouled... all of Thierry, Neville, Jamie agreed all day long that it was a penalty but we were not awarded....

i did write a lot when Giroud was top scorer in France... but earlier i wrote about Agüero and he wasnt bought when he was in Aleti.

I was actually pleased Wenger today, but baffled as to why he didn't change the tactics when Giroud came on.

He has been scoring when coming off the bench and done well this year in a more supportive role, I do not think we need to waste money on buying a backup CF when Giroud is already good enough for that.

Last week when Giroud returned from injury, he was great, Welbeck should start from the bench cos Girouds back etc....

When Giroud walked off the field he had the look on his face that suggests he had figured out what his role really was today.

So I think they will be very defensive and deep and that is when Giroud's strength, aerial ability and link up play are more useful than pace.

When Giroud is not in the side we might as well forget scoring goals from corners aswell, we look clueless in the regard without him.

Then when Giroud got injured he did not trust his boy wonder Sanogo so had to pay out 16 mill for Wellbeck which meant no new DM.

As a matter of fact earlier on in the game when it was 11 v 11 Flamini had a chance in that position, when Giroud was wide on the right.

However, as a team we don't play to our full potential when Giroud starts.

He had his chances when Giroud was out but did not take it.

When Giroud came on our midfield runners in Ramsey, Wilshere and Ox (he was operating pretty deep) came into the attack a lot more and Giroud's incisive one - touch passing helped us increase the tempo from our disjointed first half and our attacks were faster giving Everton less time to organize.

Giroud isnt the problem; the problem is the absence of a striker good enough to save us when Giroud has his dry spells.

however, when giroud came on, he kept them on their feet in the box, which provied space for the playes playin just behind him..

That when Giroud is upfront it seems there is confusion to who should put pressure on the defense, people seem lost.......

But when Giroud is fit and in form, he can be a quality contributor.