Sentences with phrase «when journal editors»

Posts cover new books and scholarship related to legal history, note when journal editors are seeking papers related to legal history and information about relevant upcoming panel discussions.

Not exact matches

When probed by Wall Street Journal editor - in - chief Gerard Baker on whether a compromise could be reached, Cook interrupted:

That's when it purchased, for an undisclosed sum, the technology - industry news site Recode, which was founded by former Wall Street Journal editors Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg.

Wall Street Journal editors performed a public service when they set out their case against the fiduciary standard recently.

And there is, in fact, very little evidence that champions of ecclesial pluralism have bent over backwards to insure that their opponents are given a fair hearing on occasions of public debate, nor are they conspicuously tolerant or open - minded when they happen themselves to be in positions of extra-ecclesial authority — as journal editors, perhaps, or as deans of theology faculties.

When the Editor - in - Chief of this journal invited me to come East to work with him and his colleagues some six and a half years ago, it was in almost every way an offer I could not refuse.

When an editor at a Catholic journal proposed to the other members of the group that Catholics needed to line up behind Tim Kaine, he was met with arch dismissals — not just because Kaine was insufficiently left on economic matters, but also because he was insufficiently dogmatic on sexual ones.

It all started a few years back when, as the senior editor of a Jerusalem - based journal of public thought, I ran into trouble on a 10,000 - word, brilliantly researched essay about Israeli social policy composed by the sweetest man on earth who, unfortunately wasn't a stellar writer.

Reuel Lemmons, editor of the widely circulated journal Firm Foundation, shares the opinion of many church leaders when he laments «the disfellowshipping mania» which regularly threatens to erupt in the congregations.

To his credit, when he sticks to the charge he was given, Sherkat finds that the journal's editor did nothing wrong in publishing either Regnerus's article or Marks's.

Matthew Bowman, an editor at a Mormon studies journal called Dialogue, says Romney appears to embody the Mormon retrenchment of the 1960s and 1970s, when the LDS church defined itself largely in opposition to the broader American culture, which was seeing cultural upheaval and the sexual revolution.

Third, acknowledging that some of the blame for the biased and one - sided media reporting on head injuries rests with some members of the scientific community who issue one - sided press releases and feed cherry - picked results about their findings to selected members of the media, the authors look to a day when the «harsh division and polarization» in the research community (an almost inevitable byproduct, unfortunately, of the intense competition for grant money in Concussion, Inc.), gives way to greater collaboration among researchers and a more «cordial discourse» between scientists via letters and responses to journal editors and back - and - forth debates at large academic conferences.

When I reach Emory bioethicist Paul Root Wolpe, editor in chief of the American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience, he opens up a can of outrage.

That honor goes to a case that came to light in May 2013, when Ali Nayfeh, then editor - in - chief of the Journal of Vibration and Control, received some troubling news.

Norbert Fusenig, the Germany - based associate editor of the International Journal of Cancer, notes that the journal has had a steady increase in submissions since 2012, when it began to require authentiJournal of Cancer, notes that the journal has had a steady increase in submissions since 2012, when it began to require authentijournal has had a steady increase in submissions since 2012, when it began to require authentication.

When the editor of a locksmith journal plugged into the Internet last year, he was appalled to find trade secrets being openly discussed.

«I was asked to be associate editor when the editor of the journal changed.

For example, you could be working on journal A when an editor calls up about the next issue of journal B, or the printer discovers a problem with journal C (which is already running late).

«When we think of heart disease and high blood pressure, the main dietary villain that we've been trained to think about is salt, when it's actually sugar,» says James DiNicolantonio, a cardiovascular research scientist at St. Luke's Mid America Heart Institute in Missouri and associate editor at the journal Open HeWhen we think of heart disease and high blood pressure, the main dietary villain that we've been trained to think about is salt, when it's actually sugar,» says James DiNicolantonio, a cardiovascular research scientist at St. Luke's Mid America Heart Institute in Missouri and associate editor at the journal Open Hewhen it's actually sugar,» says James DiNicolantonio, a cardiovascular research scientist at St. Luke's Mid America Heart Institute in Missouri and associate editor at the journal Open Heart.

And when it came time to apply for a job she decided to pursue a career as a journal editor.

Retraction guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) say that editors should negotiate with authors on how to phrase a retraction, but not whether a journal should contact all of the authors, or what it should do when they don't respond to an e-mail.

The paper was chosen by the American Chemical Society journal as an ACS Editor's Choice for its potential scientific and broad public interest when it initially published online.

«We can easily see that American football players take an enormous amount of physical punishment when they play,» said Thoru Pederson, Ph.D., Editor - in - Chief of The FASEB Journal, «but what we can't see so easily are the long - term effects.

In an e-mail to Science, the person listed on the journal's website as editor - in - chief, Raghavendra Kulkarni, a professor of pharmacy at the BLDEA College of Pharmacy in Bijapur, India, stated that he has «not had access to [the] editorial process by Elsevier» since April, when the journal's owner «started working on [the] editorial process.»

(The editors there weren't upset when they learned of the switch because the journal was already moving to a new domain.)

May it serve as a warning not only to policymakers, but also to researchers, clinicians, peer reviewers, journal editors, and journalists of the need to consider the harm to scientific credibility and public health when dealing with studies funded by food companies with vested interests in the results — and to find better ways to fund such studies and to prevent, disclose and manage potentially conflicted interests,» writes Marion Nestle, Ph.D., M.P.H., of New York University, in a related commentary.

«It is very difficult to cross-examine a witness when the similarities and dissimilarities are displayed, frequently magnified, for all, including the jury, to see,» says David Carson, editor of the British forensic journal, Expert Evidence.

«Certainly on the national stage, [Chester is a thoughtful, measured, serious presence in a time when we see lots of enthusiastic state school chiefs do two or three things before flaming out,» said Frederick Hess, an education scholar with the Washington, D.C. - based American Enterprise Institute and an executive editor at Education Next, a journal published at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.

Philpott, who has written for the New York Times and many other publications and is currently the editor of Musing, the online literary journal of Parnassus Books, was puzzled and amused when she heard that Penguin Books and Random House were planning to join forces.

Then, when the time comes for you to query literary agents or submit your writing to literary journals, you'll have a substantial author platform built for agents and editors to look at and admire.

Literary journal editors and literary agents often search for authors on Google and visit author websites and social media profiles when reviewing submissions, so a strong author platform is key to an author's success.

Typical results when communicating appropriately with city business journal editors to generate book publicity include:

When I first inquired about the possibility of submitting my work to the Atlanta Journal for review, I received a nice letter back from the editor of entertainment, Suzanne Van Atten.

I was then invited by outgoing editor Gary Meffe (who had been at the helm when the original essay was published) to submit a letter for possible publication in the journal.

Scott McCartney, Travel Editor for The Wall Street Journal, talks about how airlines can't grow when they are in triage mode and that people fly for safety, not the wine list.

César Daly, editor of the Revue générale de l'architecture, used a similar military term, éclaireur, or «scout,» in the 1840s, when he said that the journal must «fulfill an active mission of «scouting the path of the future,»» a mission both socially and artistically advanced.3 Baudelaire, after a brief flirtation with radical politics in 1848 — he had actually fought on the barricades and shortly after, in 1851, had written a eulogistic introduction to the collected Chants et chansons of the left - wing worker - poet Pierre Dupont, condemning the «puerile utopia of the art - for - art's sake school,» praising the «popular convictions» and «love of humanity» expressed in the poet's pastoral, political, and socialistic songs4 — later mocked the politico - military implications of the term «avant - garde» in Mon Coeur mis à nu, written in 1862 — 64.5

I can not say that I was surprised when the editors informed me that they would not be sending it out for review because «we are not persuaded that your article represents a sufficiently substantial contribution to the «climate change debate» [my quotation marks] to justify publication in the journal».

Academic freedom does not suffer when members of the public can see the work better than the peer - reviewers and the editors of a journal.

It seems the problems began when the journal's editors agreed to a special issue on «Pattern in solar variability, their planetary origin and terrestrial impacts,» in which the issue's editors had the temerity to «doubt the continued, even accelerated, warming as claimed by the IPCC project.»

And how could they, when these journals are controlled by editors who favor the very organizations Lindzen accuses?

Recognizing that peer review procedures at some academic journals has been misused to block the publication of research that is contrary to the views of editors or influential figures in the climate science establishment, with the Editor's approval, consideration will be given to including material from non-peer-reviewed sources when credible and important scientific findings not available elsewhere.

Non-significant results are less likely to be reported by authors and, when submitted for peer review, are less likely to be published by journal editors.

When von Storch, then the journal's editor, read Mann's critique, he said he realized his journal should never have accepted the study: «If it would have been properly reviewed, it would have been rejected on the basis of methodological flaws.»

When Climate Research published a paper dissenting from the Jones - Mann «consensus,» Jones demanded that the journal «rid itself of this troublesome editor,» and Mann advised that «we have to stop considering Climate Research as a legitimate peer - reviewed journal.

Within 48 hours he is writing (# 309): «It is the editor and peer reviewers of a suitable journal who will be far more able to pick up any errors in your assumptions or calculations than I.» That is, he feels able to make unwarranted and unjustified criticisms at one stage, but when challenged pleads a lack of competence to have made such criticisms in the first place.

I haven't followed this too closely, but my personal reaction to this is that the editor of the journal should pay close attention to potential conflicts when an individual scientist whose paper is being critiqued is asked to review that same paper.

But according to my new analysis [PDF] of the papers published in Climate Research, there is a very clear gap in credibility during the years 1997 - 2003 when Chris de Freitas served as one of the journal's editors.

When submitting a paper to PNAS have you prefaced your cover letter to the editor with remarks to the effect that you know the journal is a «scam» but you're hoping to avoid being besmirched?

The idea for collaboration surfaced in 2006 when student editors struggled to identify viable Internet strategies for their journals, and Joe Edelheit Ross, who was president of the Stanford Law Review at the time, came up with the core idea.

When the inaugural editor of this Journal posed the question, «What is legal writing?»