If Felder and the IDC do flip, it could lead to chaos in the final session weeks reminiscent of the 2009 Senate coup,
when leadership of the chamber remained divided 31 - 31 for a month.
Not exact matches
Election years tend to chill swift movement on appropriations bills — especially
when there's potential turnover in
leadership of one or both
chambers.
The
leadership of the two
chambers constantly hold discussions and are in agreement on what to do, how to do it,
when to do it and why it must be done.
But either way,
when he ascends to the top
of the Democratic conference in the
chamber, he'll be the first senator from New York to hold a top party
leadership position since senators started designating them in the early 1920s.
And then there is this, after seven years
of elections and corruption scandals that remade the
leadership of both
chambers: The Legislature is a different place than
when Cuomo was first elected.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo was fairly terse in his response just now
when asked for a reaction to the Senate GOP's move to strip LG Bob Duffy
of his right to break a tie in the event
of a deadlocked
leadership vote in the
chamber.
Yeah, I don't think the group that keeps Democrats out
of the
leadership, run by the guy who chaired the DSCC
when they re-lost the
chamber, gets to throw the «destroy the Democratic party» thing at a party that 99.9 %
of the time cross-endorses Democrats.
After decades
of operating under the take - no - prisoners model
of majority
leadership, the GOP got a taste
of its own medicine in 2008
when it lost control
of the
chamber — and all the perks that go along with it, from staffing cash to offices to member item money — in 2008.
But knowing the composition
of the state legislature, and the hostility
of the Republican
leadership in both
chambers to Prop B, we knew that we'd have to entertain compromise on some elements
of the agreement (at no point, ever, publically, has Pacelle or anyone from HSUS mentioned any thought
of compromise — and likely, this is why they didn't have a seat at the table
when it came to this new law), in order to protect the measure for the long term and to obviate the need for a second public vote on the issue.