At a time
when modern humans were beginning to leave Africa and the Neanderthals were living on our planet, Scholz's star — named after the German astronomer who discovered it — approached less than a light - year from the Sun.
Unearthed between 1949 and 1963, the controversial artifacts were made during a transitional time,
when modern humans were sweeping across Europe and the Neandertals who had lived there for hundreds of thousands of years were dying out.
Not exact matches
That struck a chord with me
when I realized that it might mean that creationists
are a better adaptation to
modern human life.
There
's Arkansas, bounty hunters, snakes real,
human, and symbolic,
being rescued from a snake pit by a very errant knight, a display of the gratuitous slaughter that comes
when you take the law in your own hands, a deep commentary on place, displacement, the state of nature, and the techno - forces of the
modern world and
modern government, solidly American thoughts on law, property, justice, and keeping your word, and so forth and so on.
While a definition of faith as subjectivity — i.e., authentic
human existence culminates in faith — could
be real in Kierkegaard's time, it can no longer
be so at a time
when the death of God has become so fully incarnate in the
modern consciousness.
First, its premisses concerning society and
modern man
are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God
was invented
when the
human race
was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that
were appropriate
when his thought processes
were primitive; the affirmation that the
modern world has
been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible
is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these
are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about
modern man or present - day society.)
If you hold that no
human death came before sinfulness, then it depends on what you call
human (there
is a gradation of forms leading up to the
modern human skeleton in the fossil record, as well as the overwhelming genetic evidence that we arose through an evolutionary process) and what you consider sin (i.e.
when did we become accountable to God for our actions?).
When Bertrand Russell stated at Columbia University in 1950 that Christian love or compassion
was the thing most needed by
modern humans, he moved revealingly close to declaring intellectual bankruptcy on his and many others» behalf.
When modern theorists envisage man as a
being who knows what he wants, or who at least possesses an «unconscious» that knows for him, they may simply have failed to perceive the domain in which
human uncertainty
is most extreme.
In our generation there
is danger and hope — danger that these noncognitive accouterments will lose their aesthetic harmony and hypnotic power
when integrated with the basic prehensions of science, and
be reverted into impotent and empty symbols, jarring, ugly, and without force in final satisfactions: hope that the power of Jesus as lure will reassert itself in an aesthetic context devoid of supernaturalism, a context such that (the language now picks up echoes of van Buren) the vision of Jesus, the free man, free from authority, free from fear, «free to give himself to others, whoever they
were «1 — such that this vision in its earthly,
human purity will lure our aims to a harmonious concrescence, integrating scientific insight and moral vision and producing a
modern, intensely fulfilling
human satisfaction.
This optimistic approach to man's virtue and the problem of evil expresses itself philosophically as the idea of progress in history.17 The empirical method of
modern culture has
been successful in understanding nature; but,
when applied to an understanding of
human nature, it
was blind to some obvious facts about
human nature that simpler cultures apprehended by the wisdom of common sense.
Most important, at a time in
human history
when there
is urgent need for wisdom to guide us through a crisis of unparalleled proportions, it removes any interest in wisdom from the intelligentsia in general and the
modern university in particular.
I have suggested elsewhere that value - free technology, the military - industrial complex, and narrow nationalism might
be modern examples of such principalities and powers.9 Hendrikus Berkhof suggests that
human traditions, astrology, fixed religious rules, clans, public opinion, race, class, state, and Volk
are among the powers.10 Walter Wink sees the powers as the inner aspects of institutions, their «spirituality,» the inner spirit or driving force that animates, legitimates, and regulates their outward manifestations.11 They
are «the invisible forces that determine
human existence «12
When such things dehumanize
human life, thwart and distort the
human spirit, block God's gift of shalom, the followers of Jesus
are rallied for a new kind of holy war.
That
was in the early»70s,
when with long hair, bobbles, bangles and beads and a gleam of communitarian utopianism in my eyes, I finally found my way into the fourth century treatise by Nemesius, peri phuseos anthropon («On the Nature of the
Human»), where it at length dawned on me that ancient wisdom could
be the basis for a deeper critique of
modern narcissistic individualism than I had yet seen.
We should, therefore, not
be under the illusion that
when anatomically
modern human beings emerged 100,000 or so years ago, after millions of years of evolutionary change, they ceased to
be influenced significantly by their evolutionary past.
Human nature comprises evil as well as good, and that has never
been shown to
be more obvious than in this century,
when 6 million Jews
were killed by the most important,
modern nation in the world, the most democratic, and the most intellectually and educationally advanced.
When Jesus represented Abraham in Paradise saying to Dives in torment, «Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and Lazarus in like manner evil things: but now here he
is comforted, and thou art in anguish,» (Luke 16:25)-- as though such reversal of circumstance, issuing in a permanently divided humanity, some in bliss and some in torture, would
be an ethically adequate ending to the
human story — he spoke in the traditional manner of Judaism, but the
modern conscience remains unconvinced.
Nietzsche, the greatest
modern master of understanding man, has taught us an ironical and intimately
human mode of listening, and this listening
is often most effective
when it listens to what
is not said.
Practically speaking, until
modern times, pregnancy and birth have
been natural processes that have occurred with very little intervention since the epoch began
when humans became inhabitants of earth.
This
is the same argument that Robert Mugabe used to suppress the
human rights of LGBT people in Zimbabwe; that the former president of Nigeria, Goodluck Jonathan, used
when he signed the most dangerous law against LGBT people in the
modern world; and that President Yoweri Museveni used in a ceremonial signing of the anti-gay bill in Uganda.
«Revising the story of the dispersal of
modern humans across Eurasia: Technological advances and multidisciplinary research teams
are reshaping our understanding of
when and how
humans left Africa — and who they met along the way.»
One of the most important early Neandertal sites
was discovered in
modern - day Croatia in 1899,
when Dragutin Gorjanovic - Kramberger, Director of the Geology and Paleontology Department of the National Museum and Professor of Paleontology and Geology at Zagreb University, alerted by a local schoolteacher, first visited the Krapina cave and noted cave deposits, including a chipped stone tool, bits of animal bones, and a single
human molar.
«I can't believe that it
is purely coincidence, based on what else we know happens
when modern humans enter a new area,» says Richard Roberts, a geochronologist at the University of Wollongong, Australia.
Is that still true for
humans when modern medicine and technology have increased everybody's ability to survive?
«Only once before in
human history have we encountered a similar process: in the early
modern era,
when the counterbalance that had
been establish at a local level in the Middle Ages
was surpassed by the increasing political and economic scale.
A great deal
when his DNA profile
is one of the «earliest diverged» — oldest in genetic terms — found to - date in a region where
modern humans are believed to have originated roughly 200,000 years ago.
Flo and her species lived on Flores from about 90,000 years ago until about 14,000 years ago,
when they
were wiped out — perhaps by a volcanic eruption, or perhaps by competition with
modern humans.
«We thought if we did interbreed, it might have
been when modern humans came to Europe, about 30,000 to 40,000 years ago,» Pääbo says.
This knowledge could play an important role in the design of future vaccination campaigns, but also highlights a deeper evolutionary logic which
modern humans sometimes
are governed by: as social
beings, in the right circumstances, we can afford to take into account a broader societal context, but
when we get the chance to invest in the evolutionary «core values» (survival and procreation) the larger context
is easily forgotten.
When Skinner and his colleagues looked at the metacarpals of early
human species and neanderthals — who also used stone flakes for tasks like scraping and butchering — they found bone ends that
were shaped like
modern human bones, and unlike ape bones.
The team's data revealed that the mtDNA
was like that of
modern humans and different from that of Neandertals, but critics argued that the samples may have
been contaminated with
modern human DNA
when an undetermined number of people handled the fossils.
The new DNA sequence shows it actually happened in the middle of an age called the Initial Upper Palaeolithic,
when there
was an explosion of
modern human culture.
Exactly
when Blatella germanica threw in its lot with
humans is unknown, though it
is generally thought to
be African in origin and may initially have inhabited caves, as many
modern roach species do.
In 2004 historian John Coatsworth described globalization as «what happens
when the movement of people, goods, or ideas among countries and regions accelerates,» and that process has
been carrying on in one form or another since
modern humans first ventured out of Africa.
«Although autonomy - establishing behavior
is clearly of value in
modern Western society, in which daily survival threats
are minimal, it may have become linked to stress reactions over the course of
human evolution,
when separation from the larger
human pack
was likely to bring grave danger,» Allen and colleagues write.
From this study [subscription required], Zollikofer concludes that Neanderthal mothers may have had their first child, on average,
when they
were a year or two older than
modern humans and that their time between pregnancies
was probably longer.
Along with researchers like Louis Herman, a University of Hawaii scientist who found that dolphins can quickly recognize
human gestures like pointing, even
when a person
is on TV, Reiss
was shepherding dolphin science into the
modern age.
This dietary flexibility of
modern humans would have
been a big advantage
when competing with Neandertals and led to their final success.
«This study provides indirect support to the idea that Middle Palaeolithic Hominins, probably Neandertals,
were able to consume fish
when it
was available, and that therefore, the prey choice of Neandertals and
modern humans was not fundamentally different,» says Hervé Bocherens.
And the variation in skull size and facial shape
is no greater than in other species, including both
modern humans or chimps, says Ponce de León — especially
when the growth of the jaw and face over a lifetime
are considered.
We
're getting an idea of what comes later
when modern humans became so flexible that they could exploit almost any environment,» she says.
«One of the things you see
when modern humans show up
is a big leap in the distances over which materials move.»
But for now, the genetics, and even
when the genome
is published, we still won't know, because so much of the
human genome, we don't know what it means functionally; that holds true for
modern humans, so of course, it
's not going to instantly tell us everything that we want to know about Neandertals.
His weapon of choice
is a bamboo rod attached to a sharpened stone, modeled after the killing tools wielded by early
modern humans some 50,000 years ago,
when they cohabited in Eurasia with their large - boned relatives, the Neanderthals.
Body ornaments had
been found at Neanderthal camps before, but they dated to near the period
when Neanderthals shared Europe with
modern humans.
WHEN the first
modern humans left Africa they
were ill - equipped to cope with unfamiliar diseases.
The new DNA sequence shows it actually happened in the middle of an age called the Initial Upper Palaeolithic,
when there
was an explosion in
modern human culture.
When it comes to
human evolution, Europe and the Near East
are crucial places: Europe has the first cave art, and the Near East has the first sightings of
modern humans out of Africa, for example.
Although many other developments and technologies have come along to help us reproduce almost like rabbits, Laland argues that «if it
were the case that
humans were adapted to environments in the Pleistocene [epoch ending more than 10,000 years ago] but not the Holocene [
modern era, which followed], you would expect
human populations would have shrunk
when they moved into urban environments.»
When modern humans use a forceful precision grip frequently during childhood, their bones adapt: Tiny spicules, or filaments, of bony tissue called trabeculae form and act as struts to provide more bone density — and strength — where the forces
are greatest.