Sentences with phrase «when played in his position»

I know that was because they failed many times when they played in those positions.

and most importantly what he can make our entire attack do, when his played in that position.

To my recollection, he has not scored a single goal when played in that position.

Second, when he played in that position he did not do a good job, he was barely average or worse, so i just do nt get the logic.

«First of all, when you play in this position you have to be effective defensively.

when you play in that position for long, you will become really a good above average player.

It's hard to be consistent when you play in a position that's not very natural to you.

He's acquitted himself brilliantly in that position since Ozil was injured which can not be said of the latter when he played in that position before his injury.

Yet no one said that when they played in those positions in Cup final Xaka and Ramesy can't play together..........

The boy when played in his position is one of the finest players out there for his engine, link up play and goals.

And we know he is very good when played in his position, why get a no 10 player to be playing wing when you have wingers, if he wanted wingers he would had gone for that.

Not exact matches

There are a lot of challenging social dynamics at play when someone this young is in this kind of position, and I have to go above and beyond what is required normally to establish my legitimacy in this position.

It is the worst version of power play when people are seeking someone's mentorship for things that are critical to their livelihood, and then they're put in that position.

When you're playing in the U.S. market, you're almost de facto positioned to do that.

When you accepted the position as COO for N — , you said, «I'm excited to be part of N — as we play a pivotal role in helping large companies adapt their sales and marketing organizations.»

«While everyone who supports small businesses wants to see these employees profit when their companies profit, it's best for entrepreneurs to determine how the tax cuts will actually play out in their situation before putting themselves in a potentially cash - poor position.»

Mertesacker is the type that will win headers that go towards him, but if he has to move for it then he's in trouble, but he's very good at positioning himself so it's not that big a deal, though when he does get caught out it seems to stick in my head for a while, like against Anderlecht... Players like Koscielny and Gabriel are a lot more mobile, they move and attack the ball when it's played into their area.

Sanchez, Ozil and Ramsey (when he is allowed to play in his natural position not Wenger's «accomodate Wack Wiltshire» 4 -1-4-1) are world class players, the rest?

Can anyone remember when was the last time AFC had a complete team?We always seem to have gaping holes that we fill in with weak players or players playing out of position.

Santi is also very adept at playing in that position but in my opinion, I feel the team can get more out of Ramsey when he's playing there.

Respect to Aaron for stating a fact, Wenger make the fans criticize the players because he force them in the team or play them out of position like wilsh and Ramsey.if Wenger would accept to rotate the players every one would have play time but he insists on playing the same team again and again.He does it when we win and when we loose that why we are never consistent enough to win big trophies.

poor signings and allowing unnecessary sellings of players not based on team needs When Cr7 is not scoring and marcelo and casemiro become strikers over their main roles in the team... Players play what coaches tell them especially positioning and movements... Hard days are ahead with PSG looming..

The storm is coming when you buy a player for 42 million you don't play him in his best position you are crazy.

i do nt, see why buying a new dm has to mean the end for arteta because he was being played out of position wait and see when he comes he will be used in a different way by arsene!!

When played in his proper position, with a proper box to box CM, Le Coq does the combative job we need him to, and he does it very well.

Arsenal now have 2 top quality players for every position and in some cases 3, we should be looking at playing the fittest players in their best position in every game and then when everyone is at the same level then sent le into the best x1, but rotation is still important to.keep up the fitness.

The only reason he hasn't had more time is because of injuries and the fact that Wenger has not been playing him enough and when he has he plays him in various positions to experiment with him.

When played with Xhaka, who prefers to originate in the same deep position as Le Coq, and does not prefer to play in an advanced position of the DM, then Le Coq is useless.

We played 2 LB as CB when they are both really good in the LWB position.

I love Ozil btw When he first came here I had my doubts However, last season's performance completely won me over I think before that it annoyed me when Ozil played on the left but now he is in his best position in the centre and is flourisWhen he first came here I had my doubts However, last season's performance completely won me over I think before that it annoyed me when Ozil played on the left but now he is in his best position in the centre and is flouriswhen Ozil played on the left but now he is in his best position in the centre and is flourishing

Ricky, who has played every position, brings to mind another Spartan of the same size, whose magic Ricky studied when he was a Michigan State ball boy in the late»70s.

Wenger has no tactics, plays his favourite players over better players, gives long term contracts to average and injury prone players, hates strong physical players, plays players out of position, always looking for excuse like refrees and saying other teams played more in pre season, does nt spend money on players required like if we need strikers he will buy CAM, waits for other teams to buy top players and signs average on deadline day, calls accident when we lose, talks cohesion and mental strength when we beat terrible teams and win mickey mouse trophy like Asia cup and community shield.

I disagree.A wingback can be viewed as a defensive winger.Whether the Ox likes it or not he's been blessed with the qualities of a winger.To me that's his best position.He's only doing well as a wingback because of his attacking abilities.As I said earlier a wingback can be viewed as a sort of defensive winger.That's why CB's who are used as RB or LB can not play wingback.Wingback needs the player to be able to adapt himself like a winger while also being solid defensively.Ox has the attacking part but not the defensive part.With Bellerin we have the best of both worlds.He can attack, defend and also has the speed necessary to play wingback.I fear Ox being played at wingback will cost us when we play teams with tricky wingers.He should rather be challenging Sanchez or Ozil for their positions and not wingback.The guy hates to always have to defend which in truth he can't.

Cavani on other hand has a great record when playing in the right position but even that won't guarantee an instant hit in the EPL.

So far that is Wenger's biggest mistake and it will haunt him (and us) all season — either he drops his captain (and then what is the point of having a captain if you don't play him) or he perseveres with him when we clearly need someone better in that position and get hammered by the Chelseas of this world again this coming season.

In turn, it is hoped that all concerned can reach an agreement over an extension as he evidently still wants to continue his playing career, with a directorial position awaiting him when he finally decides to hang up his boots.

i have to agree with @El blaze, this article is irrelevant, if you read the full interview he said he & his family were very happy & love living in paris!why would he leave now that he «s back playing in his favourite position when he stuck for 3 years playing wide??

I think Ramsey play better coming off the bench, when ever he's in the starting eleven he rarely scores a goal, he gives the ball away far to often and sometimes in dangerous positions, he makes straight forward passes or the simple passes, I've never seen him make a defense splitting pass or a through ball, the only positive about him starting a match is his engine, he will definitely cover a lot of ground but i think we need more of a creative or Attacking CM in that position because of the back three formation.

-- consistent injury issue — no signings (when we need them and there are better players out there than we have in our team / squad)-- no strength in depth (kids, or not sufficient quality bought)-- no consistency in performance (motivation)-- tactical nativity and inflexibility — players played out of position or too Many like minded players accommodated in same line up.

What I don't understand is AW taking huge risks by playing young players out of position especially when we have the best LB in the German league last season on the bench.

Since you are asking off the top of my head kallstrom bischoff silvestre denilson park cou young jeffers stepanovs squillaci chamakh cygan djourou richard wright senderos gervinho diaby santos arshavin (who was good when playing in his correct position)

obviously I would prefer to have a much more suitable alternative in the defensive midfielder positions but if they focused more on defensive end and the occasional long - ball, this would allow Bellerin and Sead ample opportunities to bomb forward on their respective wings while still having enough cover to maintain their defensive shape... it would likewise allow for overlapping runs on both wings, thereby letting both Sanchez and Perez to cut inside and get shots away in and around the top of the box with their most dominant feet... if goals were needed I would sub Bellerin for OX and bring Ramsey in for Elneny then switch to a 3 -2-4-1 (more of a 3 -1-5-1 with Ramsey playing higher up the pitch) and I would only use Giroud as a sub when the game dictated it for tactical reasons... this would allow us to be a high energy team with incredible link - up play and a much more direct approach in the offensive end

He does nt believe in the CDM position, he never changes tactics and when he did this season its been this stupid 4141 where everyone plays out of position, he thinks were fine on strikers....

When Wenger decides what his BEST position is (CB probably), he will settle in and again play as he did when he first arrived and he will then begin to mature from thWhen Wenger decides what his BEST position is (CB probably), he will settle in and again play as he did when he first arrived and he will then begin to mature from thwhen he first arrived and he will then begin to mature from there.

(3) formation flexibility — it took 20 years for Wenger to return to a back 3 and now he can't seem to choose anything but that formation... the teams in the premiership and those we could face in the Europa will present vastly different tactics and we need to have a manager who can prepare this squad for this eventuality and have the fortitude to make the necessary adjustments throughout the season... I have seen nothing in the past 6 - 7 years to suggest that he is the man to take on this challenge... I can't even remember when he changed formations when he would replace a small, pacy striker, like during the Walcott experiment, with the lumbering Giroud... of course this is exactly why there is no other manager in the world that plays more players out of their natural positions (square peg in a round hole)

Of course when you play a player out of position day in day out, then the best would always be in the pending state.

I truly don't know where you stand on the debate over the knee thing but if you're going to put down info, don't be comparing apples to oranges like you did and don't be saying that there are only 5 teams he's qualified to play for when it's more like 19 assuming that you're even remotely accurate that he couldn't be playing one of the safety positions in a 3 - 4.

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

He's technically in an offside position, because he is behind the second to last man, but he can't be penalised for it unless he is in that position when the ball is played forward by a team mate.

Mesut talked about evolving his game, and he said that in context to adding goals to his assists; not to playing out wide and learning how to run at people from wide positions and learning when / how to track back on the touchline.