Sentences with phrase «when presenting this evidence»

When I presented evidence that pastor was engaged in a pattern of lying and manipulation — and he most definitely was — he looked over at another elder and said «See, I told you he was a DSM IV psychopath.»

When I presented this evidence, I also wanted to sit on your hands and move the muscle again.

It would seem strange given tha the ocean is warmer at the top and cooler towards the 2,000 m (even though both are warming), but I will be convinced by you when you present the evidence.

When you present evidence that threatens a person's worldview, it can actually strengthen their beliefs.

He «almost wants to say we should be less scientific `, when presenting the evidence to the public and to politicians.

Gone are the days when presenting your evidence to a mock jury required the arduous task of finding 12 people who could disrupt their daily lives to be in the same room at the same.

It now travels with him everywhere including to court where it is handed around when presenting evidence.

We will probably never know whether or not Craig Wright used some man - in - middle - attack when presenting his evidence to

Not exact matches

Often, though, when Priest presents them with the evidence they see the need for serious change.

The Wisdom of Keith Richards (Wall Street Journal) Keith Richards, shrouded in an ever - present cloud of cigarette smoke, wheezes a laugh when it's pointed out that many observers, based on evidence to date, disagree with his sense of his own mortality.

The governor said he would seek to strengthen state laws to prevent the purchase or possession of weapons by any adult «when either a family member, community welfare expert or law enforcement officer files a sworn request and presents evidence to the court of a threat of violence involving firearms or other weapons.»

He is descending to the level of Trump imaginary conspiracy level talk when he goes on about «fake disputes», without presenting any evidence.

I can't tell you how many Christians that I've debated on the gay marriage topic who finally, when presented with theological, social, and reasonable evidence to the contrary, just end up saying «just because.»

When evidence outside of the stories we know men wrote, is presented I am more likely than you are to change my views.

I'm sure biblelife.org, AIG, ICR and the other websites can provide you with creationism's record when given the opportunity to present their «evidence» to impartial federal courts...

Later, when pressured to present evidence, some historians tried to justify the forgery by suggesting that Leo XII had perhaps said something of the sort as Cardinal, and thus before his election, but could again not produce the actual source of the statement.

At that point I hadn't had as much evidence presented to me, and although I tended to believe the story already, I decided to split the public theology from the private behavior when I reviewed The Didache.

The contention here is that the notion of «somewhere is confused, and that when the confusion is overcome, the apparent self - evidence that it refers only to the present can be dissipated.

That is how you can say «You just don't accept the evidence» when you don't present any evidence.

When someone is presented with evidence disproving something yet they hold onto that belief despite the evidence, that is being dogmatic.

Neville i agree with you Jesus has the power to forgive sin past present and future through the cross when he died his death covered past present and future.If those in the old testament were justified by faith and made righteous then they are covered by the blood of Jesus even though he hadn't died for them yet because there hope was in God.Isn't that what the definition of faith is it is the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things unseen.The proof is Enoch how could he go to be with God if he was not righteous and only the blood of Jesus is able to do that.

When he was presented with fiftyeight peer - reviewed publications, nine books, and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system, he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution, and that it was not «good enough.»

One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they they base their beliefs on.

When presented with evidence, you say it doesn't meet the standard.

And no a belief does not mean actual knowledge, so when one proclaims a belief, it something that by definition can not be proven, so no I don't have to present evidence in order to declare a belief, but if one is saying outright that angels do not exist as being the absolute truth, then one should present evidence.

Its pretty bad when your own book can be used as evidence against your present hateful philosophies.

I guess I'll know it when I see it, but as of now, no one has ever presented me with anything that I can consider as actual, factual evidence that the God of the bible is real.

One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they base their beliefs on.

Belief is what happens when a mind is presented with evidence, or a lack thereof.

But I do hope you realize you're putting the cart before the horses in making generalized statements about atheists as if they are facts when you haven't presented anything as evidence for your notions.

When we are presented with evidence that challenges that plausibility structure we respond that «accidents» or «unknown causes» do occur, and leave the matter at that.

You decide on a daily basis when you come to this blog that regardless of the facts, the evidence that you are presented with, that not only will you ignore it, but you will just plain not understand it and try to refute it anyways.

Had the deceased lady (when she still live) presented to court some circ - u-ms-ta-n-ces and evidence substa - ntial enough to convince the honourable court to take away such right from the heirs, the former could strip such rights from the from the latter and the last will would be deemed legal.

it was Brendan Smyth's superiors in the Norbertine Order who bear primary responsibility for failing to take the appropriate action when presented with the weight of evidence I had faithfully recorded and that Bishop McKiernan subsequently presented to them...»

I'm trying to figure out how a woman that ignores evidence and has clearly made a slew of bad decisions throughout her life is supposed to be taken seriously when presented with a chance to vote on something serious that crosses her desk in congress.

If we take the definition of life as being said to be present when an organism shows evidence of individual animate existence, then from the blastocyst stage the fetus qualifies for respect.

While it need not rise to the level of certainty — for we have all know that beliefs can change when we are presented with new evidence — faith is being fully persuaded by the evidence we now have.

Even when I disagree, I feel like I need to reconsider the evidence presented in your articles.

When evidence finally started to be presented it was questionable and unverifiable.

When I read the book, the evidence and data presented there by T. Colin Campbell, PHD and his son Thomas M. Campbell, was simply irrefutable.

MLB didn't do the best job of presenting enough evidence to confirm that the ball wasn't juiced and it also didn't help matters when pitchers complained about the balls being too slick during the World Series, of all times.

But if they do this because they are afraid that night - weaning will somehow harm their baby or their attachment relationship, or they are afraid that a little controlled CIO will do more harm than good, then - Dr. Narvaez - we owe it to them and their infants to NOT MAKE CLAIMS UNSUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE HAVE A PHD OR MD AFTER OUR NAME AND PRESENT THESE CLAIMS AS EVIDENCE - BASED.

But when we are presented with the same pattern over and over again it is easy to fall victim to what is known as confirmation bias, or coming to false conclusions because the evidence we use does not come from a broad enough sample.

Even when presented with evidence based research doctors refuse to change their ways.

What the court decided was that when credible evidence (not proof) is presented the blame can be made.

He says the police presented no evidence of this during the appeal hearing and when challenged they argued that a gang simply means a group of criminals coming together on any one occasion.

Comey feels that it doesn't, and he has more information on the matter than anyone else; but that doesn't mean that someone else couldn't come to a different conclusion when presented with the same evidence.

State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a lawsuit against the Rensselaer County district attorney on Wednesday, claiming Joel Abelove «flagrantly violated» an executive order last week when Abelove's office presented evidence in a fatal police shooting to a grand jury.

Those occur when, for example, a suspect, on being presented with DNA evidence linking him to one offence, confesses to further offences.

Ed Cox cited evidence presented at Percoco's ongoing corruption trial showing the former aide using the executive chamber's Manhattan offices more than 60 times from May 2014 to December 2014 when he was running the governor's re-election campaign and was not on the state payroll.